Cargando…

Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) and low quality of life (QoL) are two common conditions. Some recent literature proposed that these two entities can be associated. However, no attempt was made to collate this literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pizzol, Damiano, Demurtas, Jacopo, Celotto, Stefano, Maggi, Stefania, Smith, Lee, Angiolelli, Gabriele, Trott, Mike, Yang, Lin, Veronese, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32964401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01712-y
_version_ 1783653706796892160
author Pizzol, Damiano
Demurtas, Jacopo
Celotto, Stefano
Maggi, Stefania
Smith, Lee
Angiolelli, Gabriele
Trott, Mike
Yang, Lin
Veronese, Nicola
author_facet Pizzol, Damiano
Demurtas, Jacopo
Celotto, Stefano
Maggi, Stefania
Smith, Lee
Angiolelli, Gabriele
Trott, Mike
Yang, Lin
Veronese, Nicola
author_sort Pizzol, Damiano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) and low quality of life (QoL) are two common conditions. Some recent literature proposed that these two entities can be associated. However, no attempt was made to collate this literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing data to estimate the strength of the association between UI and QoL. METHODS: An electronic search of major databases up to 18th April 2020 was carried out. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional and case–control studies comparing mean values in QoL between patients with UI and controls was performed, reporting random-effects standardized mean differences (SMDs) ± 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2). RESULTS: Out of 8279 articles initially screened, 23 were finally included for a total of 24,983 participants, mainly women. The mean age was ≥ 50 years in 12/23 studies. UI was significantly associated with poor QoL as assessed by the short-form 36 (SF-36) total score (n = 6 studies; UI: 473 vs. 2971 controls; SMD = − 0.89; 95% CI − 1.3 to − 0.42; I(2) = 93.5) and by the sub-scales of SF-36 and 5/8 of the domains included in the SF-36. Similar results were found using other QoL tools. The risk of bias of the studies included was generally high. CONCLUSIONS: UI is associated with a poor QoL, with a strong level of certainty. This work, however, mainly based on cross-sectional and case–control studies, highlights the necessity of future longitudinal studies for better understanding the importance of UI on QoL. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40520-020-01712-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7897623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78976232021-03-05 Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis Pizzol, Damiano Demurtas, Jacopo Celotto, Stefano Maggi, Stefania Smith, Lee Angiolelli, Gabriele Trott, Mike Yang, Lin Veronese, Nicola Aging Clin Exp Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence (UI) and low quality of life (QoL) are two common conditions. Some recent literature proposed that these two entities can be associated. However, no attempt was made to collate this literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing data to estimate the strength of the association between UI and QoL. METHODS: An electronic search of major databases up to 18th April 2020 was carried out. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional and case–control studies comparing mean values in QoL between patients with UI and controls was performed, reporting random-effects standardized mean differences (SMDs) ± 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2). RESULTS: Out of 8279 articles initially screened, 23 were finally included for a total of 24,983 participants, mainly women. The mean age was ≥ 50 years in 12/23 studies. UI was significantly associated with poor QoL as assessed by the short-form 36 (SF-36) total score (n = 6 studies; UI: 473 vs. 2971 controls; SMD = − 0.89; 95% CI − 1.3 to − 0.42; I(2) = 93.5) and by the sub-scales of SF-36 and 5/8 of the domains included in the SF-36. Similar results were found using other QoL tools. The risk of bias of the studies included was generally high. CONCLUSIONS: UI is associated with a poor QoL, with a strong level of certainty. This work, however, mainly based on cross-sectional and case–control studies, highlights the necessity of future longitudinal studies for better understanding the importance of UI on QoL. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40520-020-01712-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7897623/ /pubmed/32964401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01712-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Pizzol, Damiano
Demurtas, Jacopo
Celotto, Stefano
Maggi, Stefania
Smith, Lee
Angiolelli, Gabriele
Trott, Mike
Yang, Lin
Veronese, Nicola
Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32964401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01712-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pizzoldamiano urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT demurtasjacopo urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT celottostefano urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maggistefania urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smithlee urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT angiolelligabriele urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trottmike urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanglin urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT veronesenicola urinaryincontinenceandqualityoflifeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis