Cargando…

Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare thermoplastic mask with bra in terms of setup reproducibility and immobilization of pendulous breasts during radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-two female patients with breast cancer treated with either intensity modulated RT or 3-dimensional co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulla, Zaheeda, Iskanderani, Omar, Weber, Amina, AlMohamad, Abdullah, Al-Amoodi, Mohammed Sheikh, Soaida, Shamel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.025
_version_ 1783653731233955840
author Mulla, Zaheeda
Iskanderani, Omar
Weber, Amina
AlMohamad, Abdullah
Al-Amoodi, Mohammed Sheikh
Soaida, Shamel
author_facet Mulla, Zaheeda
Iskanderani, Omar
Weber, Amina
AlMohamad, Abdullah
Al-Amoodi, Mohammed Sheikh
Soaida, Shamel
author_sort Mulla, Zaheeda
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare thermoplastic mask with bra in terms of setup reproducibility and immobilization of pendulous breasts during radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-two female patients with breast cancer treated with either intensity modulated RT or 3-dimensional conformal RT were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 21 benefited from thermoplastic mask immobilization and 21 used a bra. Setup accuracy was evaluated using consecutive cone beam computed tomography/electronic portal imaging device sessions over the first 3 days before treatment (systematic setting), followed by weekly cone beam computed tomography/electronic portal imaging device (random settings), and compared with the reference image to calculate the corresponding translational shift (setup error) in the 3 planes. Average absolute shift values in both systematic and random settings were compared between the 2 groups. Accuracy was analyzed by comparing the percentage of pooled settings within ±0.05 and ±0.1 cm of the reference image. RESULTS: Compared with a bra, use of the mask was associated with a smaller longitudinal shift in systematic settings (difference in mean: 0.27 cm; P = .027; Mann-Whitney U test) and a lesser lateral shift in random setting (difference in mean: 0.19 cm; P = .005; Mann-Whitney U test). In the pooled systematic settings, the mask performed relatively better than the bra in the lateral and longitudinal planes, with no statistical significance. In pooled random settings, mask showed greater accuracy than bra in the lateral plane with 86.0% versus 58.9% accuracy at ±0.5 cm (P < .001) and 48.8% versus 21.7% accuracy at ±0.1 cm (P < .001), respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of radiodermatitis between the 2 groups. However, a hypofractionation regimen was associated with a lower incidence of radiodermatitis, and the severity of skin reactions was positively correlated with treatment dose (unstandardized regression coefficient: B = .001; correlation coefficient: r = .571; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Masks provide superior reproducibility compared with commercially available bras.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7897755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78977552021-03-03 Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study Mulla, Zaheeda Iskanderani, Omar Weber, Amina AlMohamad, Abdullah Al-Amoodi, Mohammed Sheikh Soaida, Shamel Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare thermoplastic mask with bra in terms of setup reproducibility and immobilization of pendulous breasts during radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-two female patients with breast cancer treated with either intensity modulated RT or 3-dimensional conformal RT were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 21 benefited from thermoplastic mask immobilization and 21 used a bra. Setup accuracy was evaluated using consecutive cone beam computed tomography/electronic portal imaging device sessions over the first 3 days before treatment (systematic setting), followed by weekly cone beam computed tomography/electronic portal imaging device (random settings), and compared with the reference image to calculate the corresponding translational shift (setup error) in the 3 planes. Average absolute shift values in both systematic and random settings were compared between the 2 groups. Accuracy was analyzed by comparing the percentage of pooled settings within ±0.05 and ±0.1 cm of the reference image. RESULTS: Compared with a bra, use of the mask was associated with a smaller longitudinal shift in systematic settings (difference in mean: 0.27 cm; P = .027; Mann-Whitney U test) and a lesser lateral shift in random setting (difference in mean: 0.19 cm; P = .005; Mann-Whitney U test). In the pooled systematic settings, the mask performed relatively better than the bra in the lateral and longitudinal planes, with no statistical significance. In pooled random settings, mask showed greater accuracy than bra in the lateral plane with 86.0% versus 58.9% accuracy at ±0.5 cm (P < .001) and 48.8% versus 21.7% accuracy at ±0.1 cm (P < .001), respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of radiodermatitis between the 2 groups. However, a hypofractionation regimen was associated with a lower incidence of radiodermatitis, and the severity of skin reactions was positively correlated with treatment dose (unstandardized regression coefficient: B = .001; correlation coefficient: r = .571; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Masks provide superior reproducibility compared with commercially available bras. Elsevier 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7897755/ /pubmed/33665487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.025 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Mulla, Zaheeda
Iskanderani, Omar
Weber, Amina
AlMohamad, Abdullah
Al-Amoodi, Mohammed Sheikh
Soaida, Shamel
Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparing Accuracy of Thermoplastic Mask versus Commercial Bra for the Immobilization of Pendulous Breast During Radiation Therapy Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparing accuracy of thermoplastic mask versus commercial bra for the immobilization of pendulous breast during radiation therapy treatment: a retrospective cohort study
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.025
work_keys_str_mv AT mullazaheeda comparingaccuracyofthermoplasticmaskversuscommercialbrafortheimmobilizationofpendulousbreastduringradiationtherapytreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT iskanderaniomar comparingaccuracyofthermoplasticmaskversuscommercialbrafortheimmobilizationofpendulousbreastduringradiationtherapytreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT weberamina comparingaccuracyofthermoplasticmaskversuscommercialbrafortheimmobilizationofpendulousbreastduringradiationtherapytreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT almohamadabdullah comparingaccuracyofthermoplasticmaskversuscommercialbrafortheimmobilizationofpendulousbreastduringradiationtherapytreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT alamoodimohammedsheikh comparingaccuracyofthermoplasticmaskversuscommercialbrafortheimmobilizationofpendulousbreastduringradiationtherapytreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT soaidashamel comparingaccuracyofthermoplasticmaskversuscommercialbrafortheimmobilizationofpendulousbreastduringradiationtherapytreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy