Cargando…

Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy

BACKGROUND: While previous studies have established several techniques for suture anchor repair of the acetabular labrum to bone during arthroscopic surgery, the current literature lacks evidence defining the appropriate number of suture anchors required to effectively restore the function of the la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGovern, Ryan P., Christoforetti, John J., Kivlan, Benjamin R., Nho, Shane J., Wolff, Andrew B., Salvo, John P., Matsuda, Dean, Ellis, Thomas J., Stubbs, Allston J., Carreira, Dominic S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120981983
_version_ 1783653747828719616
author McGovern, Ryan P.
Christoforetti, John J.
Kivlan, Benjamin R.
Nho, Shane J.
Wolff, Andrew B.
Salvo, John P.
Matsuda, Dean
Ellis, Thomas J.
Stubbs, Allston J.
Carreira, Dominic S.
author_facet McGovern, Ryan P.
Christoforetti, John J.
Kivlan, Benjamin R.
Nho, Shane J.
Wolff, Andrew B.
Salvo, John P.
Matsuda, Dean
Ellis, Thomas J.
Stubbs, Allston J.
Carreira, Dominic S.
author_sort McGovern, Ryan P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While previous studies have established several techniques for suture anchor repair of the acetabular labrum to bone during arthroscopic surgery, the current literature lacks evidence defining the appropriate number of suture anchors required to effectively restore the function of the labral tissue. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To define the location and size of labral tears identified during hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral treatment in a large multicenter cohort. The secondary purpose was to differentiate the number of anchors used during arthroscopic labral repair. The hypothesis was that the location and size of the labral tear as well as the number of anchors identified would provide a range of fixation density per acetabular region and fixation method to be used as a guide in performing arthroscopic repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We used a multicenter registry of prospectively collected hip arthroscopy cases to find patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair by 1 of 7 orthopaedic surgeons between January 2015 and January 2017. The tear location and number of anchors used during repair were described using the clockface method, where 3 o’clock denoted the anterior extent of the tear and 9 o’clock the posterior extent, regardless of sidedness (left or right). Tear size was denoted as the number of “hours” spanned per clockface arc. Chi-square and univariate analyses of variance were performed to evaluate the data for both the entire group and among surgical centers. RESULTS: A total of 1978 hips underwent arthroscopic treatment of the acetabular labrum; the most common tear size had a 3-hour span (n = 820; 41.5%). Of these hips, 1645 received labral repair, with most common repair location at the 12- to 3-o’clock position (n = 537; 32.6%). The surgeons varied in number of anchors per repair according to labral size (P < .001 for all), using 1 to 1.6 anchors for 1-hour tears, 1.7 to 2.4 anchors for 2-hour tears, 2.1 to 3.2 anchors for 3-hour tears, and 2.2 to 4.1 for 4-hour tears. CONCLUSION: Variation existed in the number of anchor implants per tear size. When labral repair involved a mean clockface arc >2 hours, at least 2 anchor points were fixated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7897831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78978312021-03-04 Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy McGovern, Ryan P. Christoforetti, John J. Kivlan, Benjamin R. Nho, Shane J. Wolff, Andrew B. Salvo, John P. Matsuda, Dean Ellis, Thomas J. Stubbs, Allston J. Carreira, Dominic S. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: While previous studies have established several techniques for suture anchor repair of the acetabular labrum to bone during arthroscopic surgery, the current literature lacks evidence defining the appropriate number of suture anchors required to effectively restore the function of the labral tissue. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To define the location and size of labral tears identified during hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral treatment in a large multicenter cohort. The secondary purpose was to differentiate the number of anchors used during arthroscopic labral repair. The hypothesis was that the location and size of the labral tear as well as the number of anchors identified would provide a range of fixation density per acetabular region and fixation method to be used as a guide in performing arthroscopic repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We used a multicenter registry of prospectively collected hip arthroscopy cases to find patients who underwent arthroscopic labral repair by 1 of 7 orthopaedic surgeons between January 2015 and January 2017. The tear location and number of anchors used during repair were described using the clockface method, where 3 o’clock denoted the anterior extent of the tear and 9 o’clock the posterior extent, regardless of sidedness (left or right). Tear size was denoted as the number of “hours” spanned per clockface arc. Chi-square and univariate analyses of variance were performed to evaluate the data for both the entire group and among surgical centers. RESULTS: A total of 1978 hips underwent arthroscopic treatment of the acetabular labrum; the most common tear size had a 3-hour span (n = 820; 41.5%). Of these hips, 1645 received labral repair, with most common repair location at the 12- to 3-o’clock position (n = 537; 32.6%). The surgeons varied in number of anchors per repair according to labral size (P < .001 for all), using 1 to 1.6 anchors for 1-hour tears, 1.7 to 2.4 anchors for 2-hour tears, 2.1 to 3.2 anchors for 3-hour tears, and 2.2 to 4.1 for 4-hour tears. CONCLUSION: Variation existed in the number of anchor implants per tear size. When labral repair involved a mean clockface arc >2 hours, at least 2 anchor points were fixated. SAGE Publications 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7897831/ /pubmed/33681399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120981983 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
McGovern, Ryan P.
Christoforetti, John J.
Kivlan, Benjamin R.
Nho, Shane J.
Wolff, Andrew B.
Salvo, John P.
Matsuda, Dean
Ellis, Thomas J.
Stubbs, Allston J.
Carreira, Dominic S.
Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy
title Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy
title_full Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy
title_fullStr Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy
title_short Allocation of Anchors During Labral Repair: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis of Labral Treatment in Hip Arthroscopy
title_sort allocation of anchors during labral repair: a multicenter cohort analysis of labral treatment in hip arthroscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7897831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120981983
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgovernryanp allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT christoforettijohnj allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT kivlanbenjaminr allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT nhoshanej allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT wolffandrewb allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT salvojohnp allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT matsudadean allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT ellisthomasj allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT stubbsallstonj allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy
AT carreiradominics allocationofanchorsduringlabralrepairamulticentercohortanalysisoflabraltreatmentinhiparthroscopy