Cargando…

Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels

Pectin is a valuable product (up to 30 $kg(−1)) that makes-up 20–30% of an orange’s peel. The commercial extraction is lengthy (up to 6 h) and energy intensive as it requires heating aqueous solutions (60–100 °C). Ultrasound speeds up the extraction process reducing processing time by macroscopic an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patience, N.A., Schieppati, D., Boffito, D.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33601279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105480
_version_ 1783653788773515264
author Patience, N.A.
Schieppati, D.
Boffito, D.C.
author_facet Patience, N.A.
Schieppati, D.
Boffito, D.C.
author_sort Patience, N.A.
collection PubMed
description Pectin is a valuable product (up to 30 $kg(−1)) that makes-up 20–30% of an orange’s peel. The commercial extraction is lengthy (up to 6 h) and energy intensive as it requires heating aqueous solutions (60–100 °C). Ultrasound speeds up the extraction process reducing processing time by macroscopic and microscopic mixing by acoustic cavitation. We adopted an ultrasonic horn to deliver a rated power of 500 W at amplitudes of 20%, 40%, and 60% with and without pulsation to extract pectin from waste orange peels. These correspond to power densities of 0.08 W ml(−1), 0.16 W ml(−1) and 0.24 W ml(−1), respectively. The extractions operated at a pH of either 2 or 3. The experimental data agree with the fitted values from the statistical model ([Formula: see text]). The model confirms our predictions that yield increases with amplitude/power density and decreasing pH. The highest yield was (11%) at a pH of 2 and with continuous ultrasonic irradiation at a power density of 0.24 W ml(−1). There is only a 1.3% difference between this datum and pulse ultrasound mode (1 s on/1 s off) at the same conditions — a Student’s t test confirmed that there was no significant difference in yield between continuous and pulse mode. However, pulsing is more efficient in that it consumes less than half the energy of continuous operation (80 kJ vs. 190 kJ).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7898032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78980322021-03-03 Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels Patience, N.A. Schieppati, D. Boffito, D.C. Ultrason Sonochem Original Research Article Pectin is a valuable product (up to 30 $kg(−1)) that makes-up 20–30% of an orange’s peel. The commercial extraction is lengthy (up to 6 h) and energy intensive as it requires heating aqueous solutions (60–100 °C). Ultrasound speeds up the extraction process reducing processing time by macroscopic and microscopic mixing by acoustic cavitation. We adopted an ultrasonic horn to deliver a rated power of 500 W at amplitudes of 20%, 40%, and 60% with and without pulsation to extract pectin from waste orange peels. These correspond to power densities of 0.08 W ml(−1), 0.16 W ml(−1) and 0.24 W ml(−1), respectively. The extractions operated at a pH of either 2 or 3. The experimental data agree with the fitted values from the statistical model ([Formula: see text]). The model confirms our predictions that yield increases with amplitude/power density and decreasing pH. The highest yield was (11%) at a pH of 2 and with continuous ultrasonic irradiation at a power density of 0.24 W ml(−1). There is only a 1.3% difference between this datum and pulse ultrasound mode (1 s on/1 s off) at the same conditions — a Student’s t test confirmed that there was no significant difference in yield between continuous and pulse mode. However, pulsing is more efficient in that it consumes less than half the energy of continuous operation (80 kJ vs. 190 kJ). Elsevier 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7898032/ /pubmed/33601279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105480 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Patience, N.A.
Schieppati, D.
Boffito, D.C.
Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels
title Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels
title_full Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels
title_fullStr Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels
title_full_unstemmed Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels
title_short Continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels
title_sort continuous and pulsed ultrasound pectin extraction from navel orange peels
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33601279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105480
work_keys_str_mv AT patiencena continuousandpulsedultrasoundpectinextractionfromnavelorangepeels
AT schieppatid continuousandpulsedultrasoundpectinextractionfromnavelorangepeels
AT boffitodc continuousandpulsedultrasoundpectinextractionfromnavelorangepeels