Cargando…

Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different pretreatment methods on the microbial yield from infectious tissues. METHODS: Strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Escherichia coli (EC) and Candida albicans (CA) were used to construct single-surface, full-surface, and internal inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Yuanqing, Fang, Xinyu, Zhang, Lvheng, Yang, Xurong, Nie, Lixiong, Huang, Zida, Li, Wenbo, Zhang, Chaofan, Yang, Bin, Guan, Zhenpeng, Zhang, Wenming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33612121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04071-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different pretreatment methods on the microbial yield from infectious tissues. METHODS: Strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Escherichia coli (EC) and Candida albicans (CA) were used to construct single-surface, full-surface, and internal infection models in sterile pork tissue. Manual milling (MM), mechanical homogenization (MH), sonificated (SF), dithiothreitol (DTT), and direct culture (DC) were used to pretreat these tissues, the microbial yield from different pretreatment methods were recorded and compared. Moreover, periprosthetic tissues collected intraoperatively from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients were used as a verification. RESULTS: The study showed that the microbial yield from MH pretreatment was significantly higher than that of MM (P < 0.01) and SF pretreatment method (P < 0.01). Furthermore, in the internal infection model, the microbial yield from MH group was also significantly higher than that of SF (P < 0.01), DTT (P < 0.01), and DC group (P < 0.01). Moreover, the number of bacterial colonies obtained from periprosthetic tissues pretreated by MH was significantly higher than pretreated by other pretreatment methods (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of MH and DTT in microbial yield were significantly higher than that of DC, SF and MM, and these methods can be used to process multiple tissue samples at the same time, which might further improve the diagnostic sensitivity of infectious disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04071-5.