Cargando…

Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different pretreatment methods on the microbial yield from infectious tissues. METHODS: Strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Escherichia coli (EC) and Candida albicans (CA) were used to construct single-surface, full-surface, and internal inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Yuanqing, Fang, Xinyu, Zhang, Lvheng, Yang, Xurong, Nie, Lixiong, Huang, Zida, Li, Wenbo, Zhang, Chaofan, Yang, Bin, Guan, Zhenpeng, Zhang, Wenming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33612121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04071-5
_version_ 1783653858877112320
author Cai, Yuanqing
Fang, Xinyu
Zhang, Lvheng
Yang, Xurong
Nie, Lixiong
Huang, Zida
Li, Wenbo
Zhang, Chaofan
Yang, Bin
Guan, Zhenpeng
Zhang, Wenming
author_facet Cai, Yuanqing
Fang, Xinyu
Zhang, Lvheng
Yang, Xurong
Nie, Lixiong
Huang, Zida
Li, Wenbo
Zhang, Chaofan
Yang, Bin
Guan, Zhenpeng
Zhang, Wenming
author_sort Cai, Yuanqing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different pretreatment methods on the microbial yield from infectious tissues. METHODS: Strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Escherichia coli (EC) and Candida albicans (CA) were used to construct single-surface, full-surface, and internal infection models in sterile pork tissue. Manual milling (MM), mechanical homogenization (MH), sonificated (SF), dithiothreitol (DTT), and direct culture (DC) were used to pretreat these tissues, the microbial yield from different pretreatment methods were recorded and compared. Moreover, periprosthetic tissues collected intraoperatively from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients were used as a verification. RESULTS: The study showed that the microbial yield from MH pretreatment was significantly higher than that of MM (P < 0.01) and SF pretreatment method (P < 0.01). Furthermore, in the internal infection model, the microbial yield from MH group was also significantly higher than that of SF (P < 0.01), DTT (P < 0.01), and DC group (P < 0.01). Moreover, the number of bacterial colonies obtained from periprosthetic tissues pretreated by MH was significantly higher than pretreated by other pretreatment methods (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of MH and DTT in microbial yield were significantly higher than that of DC, SF and MM, and these methods can be used to process multiple tissue samples at the same time, which might further improve the diagnostic sensitivity of infectious disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04071-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7898421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78984212021-02-23 Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study Cai, Yuanqing Fang, Xinyu Zhang, Lvheng Yang, Xurong Nie, Lixiong Huang, Zida Li, Wenbo Zhang, Chaofan Yang, Bin Guan, Zhenpeng Zhang, Wenming BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different pretreatment methods on the microbial yield from infectious tissues. METHODS: Strains of Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Escherichia coli (EC) and Candida albicans (CA) were used to construct single-surface, full-surface, and internal infection models in sterile pork tissue. Manual milling (MM), mechanical homogenization (MH), sonificated (SF), dithiothreitol (DTT), and direct culture (DC) were used to pretreat these tissues, the microbial yield from different pretreatment methods were recorded and compared. Moreover, periprosthetic tissues collected intraoperatively from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients were used as a verification. RESULTS: The study showed that the microbial yield from MH pretreatment was significantly higher than that of MM (P < 0.01) and SF pretreatment method (P < 0.01). Furthermore, in the internal infection model, the microbial yield from MH group was also significantly higher than that of SF (P < 0.01), DTT (P < 0.01), and DC group (P < 0.01). Moreover, the number of bacterial colonies obtained from periprosthetic tissues pretreated by MH was significantly higher than pretreated by other pretreatment methods (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of MH and DTT in microbial yield were significantly higher than that of DC, SF and MM, and these methods can be used to process multiple tissue samples at the same time, which might further improve the diagnostic sensitivity of infectious disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04071-5. BioMed Central 2021-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7898421/ /pubmed/33612121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04071-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cai, Yuanqing
Fang, Xinyu
Zhang, Lvheng
Yang, Xurong
Nie, Lixiong
Huang, Zida
Li, Wenbo
Zhang, Chaofan
Yang, Bin
Guan, Zhenpeng
Zhang, Wenming
Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study
title Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study
title_full Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study
title_fullStr Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study
title_full_unstemmed Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study
title_short Microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study
title_sort microbial yield from infectious tissues pretreated by various methods: an invitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33612121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04071-5
work_keys_str_mv AT caiyuanqing microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT fangxinyu microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT zhanglvheng microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT yangxurong microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT nielixiong microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT huangzida microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT liwenbo microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT zhangchaofan microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT yangbin microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT guanzhenpeng microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy
AT zhangwenming microbialyieldfrominfectioustissuespretreatedbyvariousmethodsaninvitrostudy