Cargando…

Similarities and Differences between Crystal and Enzyme Environmental Effects on the Electron Density of Drug Molecules

The crystal interaction density is generally assumed to be a suitable measure of the polarization of a low‐molecular weight ligand inside an enzyme, but this approximation has seldomly been tested and has never been quantified before. In this study, we compare the crystal interaction density and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleemiss, Florian, Wieduwilt, Erna K., Hupf, Emanuel, Shi, Ming W., Stewart, Scott G., Jayatilaka, Dylan, Turner, Michael J., Sugimoto, Kunihisa, Nishibori, Eiji, Schirmeister, Tanja, Schmidt, Thomas C., Engels, Bernd, Grabowsky, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33090581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202003978
Descripción
Sumario:The crystal interaction density is generally assumed to be a suitable measure of the polarization of a low‐molecular weight ligand inside an enzyme, but this approximation has seldomly been tested and has never been quantified before. In this study, we compare the crystal interaction density and the interaction electrostatic potential for a model compound of loxistatin acid (E64c) with those inside cathepsin B, in solution, and in vacuum. We apply QM/MM calculations and experimental quantum crystallography to show that the crystal interaction density is indeed very similar to the enzyme interaction density. Less than 0.1 e are shifted between these two environments in total. However, this difference has non‐negligible consequences for derived properties.