Cargando…

Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T(1) mapping MRI protocol at 7 T

PURPOSE: Blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption is commonly measured with DCE‐MRI using continuous dynamic scanning. For precise measurement of subtle BBB leakage, a long acquisition time (>20 minutes) is required. As extravasation of the contrast agent is slow, discrete sampling at strategic time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Kerkhof, Marieke, Voorter, Paulien H. M., Canjels, Lisanne P. W., de Jong, Joost J. A., van Oostenbrugge, Robert J., Kroon, Abraham A., Jansen, Jacobus F. A., Backes, Walter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28629
_version_ 1783653916669378560
author van den Kerkhof, Marieke
Voorter, Paulien H. M.
Canjels, Lisanne P. W.
de Jong, Joost J. A.
van Oostenbrugge, Robert J.
Kroon, Abraham A.
Jansen, Jacobus F. A.
Backes, Walter H.
author_facet van den Kerkhof, Marieke
Voorter, Paulien H. M.
Canjels, Lisanne P. W.
de Jong, Joost J. A.
van Oostenbrugge, Robert J.
Kroon, Abraham A.
Jansen, Jacobus F. A.
Backes, Walter H.
author_sort van den Kerkhof, Marieke
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption is commonly measured with DCE‐MRI using continuous dynamic scanning. For precise measurement of subtle BBB leakage, a long acquisition time (>20 minutes) is required. As extravasation of the contrast agent is slow, discrete sampling at strategic time points might be beneficial, and gains scan time for additional sequences. Here, we aimed to explore the feasibility of a sparsely sampled MRI protocol at 7 T. METHODS: The scan protocol consisted of a precontrast quantitative T(1) measurement, using an MP2RAGE sequence, and after contrast agent injection, a fast‐sampling dynamic gradient‐echo perfusion scan and two postcontrast quantitative T(1) measurements were applied. Simulations were conducted to determine the optimal postcontrast sampling time points for measuring subtle BBB leakage. The graphical Patlak approach was used to quantify the leakage rate (K(i)) and blood plasma volume (v(p)) of normal‐appearing white and gray matter. RESULTS: The simulations showed that two postcontrast T(1) maps are sufficient to detect subtle leakage, and most sensitive when the last T(1) map is acquired late, approximately 30 minutes, after contrast agent administration. The in vivo measurements found K(i) and v(p) values in agreement with other studies, and significantly higher values in gray matter compared with white matter (both p = .04). CONCLUSION: The sparsely sampled protocol was demonstrated to be sensitive to quantify subtle BBB leakage, despite using only three T(1) maps. Due to the time‐efficiency of this method, it will become more feasible to incorporate BBB leakage measurements in clinical research MRI protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7898690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78986902021-03-03 Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T(1) mapping MRI protocol at 7 T van den Kerkhof, Marieke Voorter, Paulien H. M. Canjels, Lisanne P. W. de Jong, Joost J. A. van Oostenbrugge, Robert J. Kroon, Abraham A. Jansen, Jacobus F. A. Backes, Walter H. Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: Blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption is commonly measured with DCE‐MRI using continuous dynamic scanning. For precise measurement of subtle BBB leakage, a long acquisition time (>20 minutes) is required. As extravasation of the contrast agent is slow, discrete sampling at strategic time points might be beneficial, and gains scan time for additional sequences. Here, we aimed to explore the feasibility of a sparsely sampled MRI protocol at 7 T. METHODS: The scan protocol consisted of a precontrast quantitative T(1) measurement, using an MP2RAGE sequence, and after contrast agent injection, a fast‐sampling dynamic gradient‐echo perfusion scan and two postcontrast quantitative T(1) measurements were applied. Simulations were conducted to determine the optimal postcontrast sampling time points for measuring subtle BBB leakage. The graphical Patlak approach was used to quantify the leakage rate (K(i)) and blood plasma volume (v(p)) of normal‐appearing white and gray matter. RESULTS: The simulations showed that two postcontrast T(1) maps are sufficient to detect subtle leakage, and most sensitive when the last T(1) map is acquired late, approximately 30 minutes, after contrast agent administration. The in vivo measurements found K(i) and v(p) values in agreement with other studies, and significantly higher values in gray matter compared with white matter (both p = .04). CONCLUSION: The sparsely sampled protocol was demonstrated to be sensitive to quantify subtle BBB leakage, despite using only three T(1) maps. Due to the time‐efficiency of this method, it will become more feasible to incorporate BBB leakage measurements in clinical research MRI protocols. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-08 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7898690/ /pubmed/33349996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28629 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
van den Kerkhof, Marieke
Voorter, Paulien H. M.
Canjels, Lisanne P. W.
de Jong, Joost J. A.
van Oostenbrugge, Robert J.
Kroon, Abraham A.
Jansen, Jacobus F. A.
Backes, Walter H.
Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T(1) mapping MRI protocol at 7 T
title Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T(1) mapping MRI protocol at 7 T
title_full Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T(1) mapping MRI protocol at 7 T
title_fullStr Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T(1) mapping MRI protocol at 7 T
title_full_unstemmed Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T(1) mapping MRI protocol at 7 T
title_short Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T(1) mapping MRI protocol at 7 T
title_sort time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a t(1) mapping mri protocol at 7 t
topic Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33349996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28629
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenkerkhofmarieke timeefficientmeasurementofsubtlebloodbrainbarrierleakageusingat1mappingmriprotocolat7t
AT voorterpaulienhm timeefficientmeasurementofsubtlebloodbrainbarrierleakageusingat1mappingmriprotocolat7t
AT canjelslisannepw timeefficientmeasurementofsubtlebloodbrainbarrierleakageusingat1mappingmriprotocolat7t
AT dejongjoostja timeefficientmeasurementofsubtlebloodbrainbarrierleakageusingat1mappingmriprotocolat7t
AT vanoostenbruggerobertj timeefficientmeasurementofsubtlebloodbrainbarrierleakageusingat1mappingmriprotocolat7t
AT kroonabrahama timeefficientmeasurementofsubtlebloodbrainbarrierleakageusingat1mappingmriprotocolat7t
AT jansenjacobusfa timeefficientmeasurementofsubtlebloodbrainbarrierleakageusingat1mappingmriprotocolat7t
AT backeswalterh timeefficientmeasurementofsubtlebloodbrainbarrierleakageusingat1mappingmriprotocolat7t