Cargando…

Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

BACKGROUND: Feature tracking (FT) has become an established tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based strain analysis. Recently, the compressed sensing (CS) technique has been applied to cine CMR, which has drastically reduced its acquisition time. However, the effects of CS imaging on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kido, Tomoyuki, Hirai, Kuniaki, Ogawa, Ryo, Tanabe, Yuki, Nakamura, Masashi, Kawaguchi, Naoto, Kurata, Akira, Watanabe, Kouki, Schmidt, Michaela, Forman, Christoph, Mochizuki, Teruhito, Kido, Teruhito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5
_version_ 1783653926931791872
author Kido, Tomoyuki
Hirai, Kuniaki
Ogawa, Ryo
Tanabe, Yuki
Nakamura, Masashi
Kawaguchi, Naoto
Kurata, Akira
Watanabe, Kouki
Schmidt, Michaela
Forman, Christoph
Mochizuki, Teruhito
Kido, Teruhito
author_facet Kido, Tomoyuki
Hirai, Kuniaki
Ogawa, Ryo
Tanabe, Yuki
Nakamura, Masashi
Kawaguchi, Naoto
Kurata, Akira
Watanabe, Kouki
Schmidt, Michaela
Forman, Christoph
Mochizuki, Teruhito
Kido, Teruhito
author_sort Kido, Tomoyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feature tracking (FT) has become an established tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based strain analysis. Recently, the compressed sensing (CS) technique has been applied to cine CMR, which has drastically reduced its acquisition time. However, the effects of CS imaging on FT strain analysis need to be carefully studied. This study aimed to investigate the use of CS cine CMR for FT strain analysis compared to conventional cine CMR. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with different left ventricular (LV) pathologies underwent both retrospective conventional cine CMR and prospective CS cine CMR using a prototype sequence with the comparable temporal and spatial resolution at 3 T. Eight short-axis cine images covering the entire LV were obtained and used for LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis. Prospective CS cine CMR data over 1.5 heartbeats were acquired to capture the complete end-diastolic data between the first and second heartbeats. LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis were performed using a dedicated software (ci(42); Circle Cardiovasacular Imaging, Calgary, Canada), and the global circumferential strain (GCS) and GCS rate were calculated from both cine CMR sequences. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the GCS (− 17.1% [− 11.7, − 19.5] vs. − 16.1% [− 11.9, − 19.3; p = 0.508) and GCS rate (− 0.8 [− 0.6, − 1.0] vs. − 0.8 [− 0.7, − 1.0]; p = 0.587) obtained using conventional and CS cine CMR. The GCS obtained using both methods showed excellent agreement (y = 0.99x − 0.24; r = 0.95; p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference in the GCS between the conventional and CS cine CMR was 0.1% with limits of agreement between -2.8% and 3.0%. No significant differences were found in all LV volume assessment between both types of cine CMR. CONCLUSION: CS cine CMR could be used for GCS assessment by CMR-FT as well as conventional cine CMR. This finding further enhances the clinical utility of high-speed CS cine CMR imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7898736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78987362021-02-23 Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment Kido, Tomoyuki Hirai, Kuniaki Ogawa, Ryo Tanabe, Yuki Nakamura, Masashi Kawaguchi, Naoto Kurata, Akira Watanabe, Kouki Schmidt, Michaela Forman, Christoph Mochizuki, Teruhito Kido, Teruhito J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Feature tracking (FT) has become an established tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based strain analysis. Recently, the compressed sensing (CS) technique has been applied to cine CMR, which has drastically reduced its acquisition time. However, the effects of CS imaging on FT strain analysis need to be carefully studied. This study aimed to investigate the use of CS cine CMR for FT strain analysis compared to conventional cine CMR. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with different left ventricular (LV) pathologies underwent both retrospective conventional cine CMR and prospective CS cine CMR using a prototype sequence with the comparable temporal and spatial resolution at 3 T. Eight short-axis cine images covering the entire LV were obtained and used for LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis. Prospective CS cine CMR data over 1.5 heartbeats were acquired to capture the complete end-diastolic data between the first and second heartbeats. LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis were performed using a dedicated software (ci(42); Circle Cardiovasacular Imaging, Calgary, Canada), and the global circumferential strain (GCS) and GCS rate were calculated from both cine CMR sequences. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the GCS (− 17.1% [− 11.7, − 19.5] vs. − 16.1% [− 11.9, − 19.3; p = 0.508) and GCS rate (− 0.8 [− 0.6, − 1.0] vs. − 0.8 [− 0.7, − 1.0]; p = 0.587) obtained using conventional and CS cine CMR. The GCS obtained using both methods showed excellent agreement (y = 0.99x − 0.24; r = 0.95; p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference in the GCS between the conventional and CS cine CMR was 0.1% with limits of agreement between -2.8% and 3.0%. No significant differences were found in all LV volume assessment between both types of cine CMR. CONCLUSION: CS cine CMR could be used for GCS assessment by CMR-FT as well as conventional cine CMR. This finding further enhances the clinical utility of high-speed CS cine CMR imaging. BioMed Central 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7898736/ /pubmed/33618722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kido, Tomoyuki
Hirai, Kuniaki
Ogawa, Ryo
Tanabe, Yuki
Nakamura, Masashi
Kawaguchi, Naoto
Kurata, Akira
Watanabe, Kouki
Schmidt, Michaela
Forman, Christoph
Mochizuki, Teruhito
Kido, Teruhito
Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
title Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
title_full Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
title_fullStr Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
title_short Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
title_sort comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kidotomoyuki comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT hiraikuniaki comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT ogawaryo comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT tanabeyuki comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT nakamuramasashi comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT kawaguchinaoto comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT kurataakira comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT watanabekouki comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT schmidtmichaela comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT formanchristoph comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT mochizukiteruhito comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment
AT kidoteruhito comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment