Cargando…
Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment
BACKGROUND: Feature tracking (FT) has become an established tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based strain analysis. Recently, the compressed sensing (CS) technique has been applied to cine CMR, which has drastically reduced its acquisition time. However, the effects of CS imaging on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5 |
_version_ | 1783653926931791872 |
---|---|
author | Kido, Tomoyuki Hirai, Kuniaki Ogawa, Ryo Tanabe, Yuki Nakamura, Masashi Kawaguchi, Naoto Kurata, Akira Watanabe, Kouki Schmidt, Michaela Forman, Christoph Mochizuki, Teruhito Kido, Teruhito |
author_facet | Kido, Tomoyuki Hirai, Kuniaki Ogawa, Ryo Tanabe, Yuki Nakamura, Masashi Kawaguchi, Naoto Kurata, Akira Watanabe, Kouki Schmidt, Michaela Forman, Christoph Mochizuki, Teruhito Kido, Teruhito |
author_sort | Kido, Tomoyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Feature tracking (FT) has become an established tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based strain analysis. Recently, the compressed sensing (CS) technique has been applied to cine CMR, which has drastically reduced its acquisition time. However, the effects of CS imaging on FT strain analysis need to be carefully studied. This study aimed to investigate the use of CS cine CMR for FT strain analysis compared to conventional cine CMR. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with different left ventricular (LV) pathologies underwent both retrospective conventional cine CMR and prospective CS cine CMR using a prototype sequence with the comparable temporal and spatial resolution at 3 T. Eight short-axis cine images covering the entire LV were obtained and used for LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis. Prospective CS cine CMR data over 1.5 heartbeats were acquired to capture the complete end-diastolic data between the first and second heartbeats. LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis were performed using a dedicated software (ci(42); Circle Cardiovasacular Imaging, Calgary, Canada), and the global circumferential strain (GCS) and GCS rate were calculated from both cine CMR sequences. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the GCS (− 17.1% [− 11.7, − 19.5] vs. − 16.1% [− 11.9, − 19.3; p = 0.508) and GCS rate (− 0.8 [− 0.6, − 1.0] vs. − 0.8 [− 0.7, − 1.0]; p = 0.587) obtained using conventional and CS cine CMR. The GCS obtained using both methods showed excellent agreement (y = 0.99x − 0.24; r = 0.95; p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference in the GCS between the conventional and CS cine CMR was 0.1% with limits of agreement between -2.8% and 3.0%. No significant differences were found in all LV volume assessment between both types of cine CMR. CONCLUSION: CS cine CMR could be used for GCS assessment by CMR-FT as well as conventional cine CMR. This finding further enhances the clinical utility of high-speed CS cine CMR imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7898736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78987362021-02-23 Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment Kido, Tomoyuki Hirai, Kuniaki Ogawa, Ryo Tanabe, Yuki Nakamura, Masashi Kawaguchi, Naoto Kurata, Akira Watanabe, Kouki Schmidt, Michaela Forman, Christoph Mochizuki, Teruhito Kido, Teruhito J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Feature tracking (FT) has become an established tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based strain analysis. Recently, the compressed sensing (CS) technique has been applied to cine CMR, which has drastically reduced its acquisition time. However, the effects of CS imaging on FT strain analysis need to be carefully studied. This study aimed to investigate the use of CS cine CMR for FT strain analysis compared to conventional cine CMR. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with different left ventricular (LV) pathologies underwent both retrospective conventional cine CMR and prospective CS cine CMR using a prototype sequence with the comparable temporal and spatial resolution at 3 T. Eight short-axis cine images covering the entire LV were obtained and used for LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis. Prospective CS cine CMR data over 1.5 heartbeats were acquired to capture the complete end-diastolic data between the first and second heartbeats. LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis were performed using a dedicated software (ci(42); Circle Cardiovasacular Imaging, Calgary, Canada), and the global circumferential strain (GCS) and GCS rate were calculated from both cine CMR sequences. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the GCS (− 17.1% [− 11.7, − 19.5] vs. − 16.1% [− 11.9, − 19.3; p = 0.508) and GCS rate (− 0.8 [− 0.6, − 1.0] vs. − 0.8 [− 0.7, − 1.0]; p = 0.587) obtained using conventional and CS cine CMR. The GCS obtained using both methods showed excellent agreement (y = 0.99x − 0.24; r = 0.95; p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference in the GCS between the conventional and CS cine CMR was 0.1% with limits of agreement between -2.8% and 3.0%. No significant differences were found in all LV volume assessment between both types of cine CMR. CONCLUSION: CS cine CMR could be used for GCS assessment by CMR-FT as well as conventional cine CMR. This finding further enhances the clinical utility of high-speed CS cine CMR imaging. BioMed Central 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7898736/ /pubmed/33618722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kido, Tomoyuki Hirai, Kuniaki Ogawa, Ryo Tanabe, Yuki Nakamura, Masashi Kawaguchi, Naoto Kurata, Akira Watanabe, Kouki Schmidt, Michaela Forman, Christoph Mochizuki, Teruhito Kido, Teruhito Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment |
title | Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment |
title_full | Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment |
title_fullStr | Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment |
title_short | Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment |
title_sort | comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kidotomoyuki comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT hiraikuniaki comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT ogawaryo comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT tanabeyuki comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT nakamuramasashi comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT kawaguchinaoto comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT kurataakira comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT watanabekouki comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT schmidtmichaela comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT formanchristoph comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT mochizukiteruhito comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment AT kidoteruhito comparisonbetweenconventionalandcompressedsensingcinecardiovascularmagneticresonanceforfeaturetrackingglobalcircumferentialstrainassessment |