Cargando…

The Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score as a predictor of aneurysm growth or rupture

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score (UIATS) was built to harmonize the treatment decision making on unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Therefore, it may also function as a predictor of aneurysm progression. In this study, we aimed to assess the validity of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molenberg, Rob, Aalbers, Marlien W., Mazuri, Aryan, Luijckx, Gert Jan, Metzemaekers, Jan D. M., Groen, Rob J. M., Uyttenboogaart, Maarten, van Dijk, J. Marc C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33175449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.14636
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score (UIATS) was built to harmonize the treatment decision making on unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Therefore, it may also function as a predictor of aneurysm progression. In this study, we aimed to assess the validity of the UIATS model to identify aneurysms at risk of growth or rupture during follow‐up. METHODS: We calculated the UIATS for a consecutive series of conservatively treated unruptured intracranial aneurysms, included in our prospectively kept neurovascular database. Computed tomography angiography and/or magnetic resonance angiography imaging at baseline and during follow‐up was analyzed to detect aneurysm growth. We defined rupture as a cerebrospinal fluid or computed tomography–proven subarachnoid hemorrhage. We calculated the area under the receiver operator curve, sensitivity, and specificity, to determine the performance of the UIATS model. RESULTS: We included 214 consecutive patients with 277 unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Aneurysms were followed for a median period of 1.3 years (range 0.3–11.7 years). During follow‐up, 17 aneurysms enlarged (6.1%), and two aneurysms ruptured (0.7%). The UIATS model showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 44%. The area under the receiver operator curve was 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.46–0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Our observational study involving consecutive patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm showed poor performance of the UIATS model to predict aneurysm growth or rupture during follow‐up.