Cargando…

Age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer

Circulating cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) has spurred much interest as a biomarker in oncology. However, inter‐ and intra‐individual cfDNA levels vary greatly. Consequently, in order to base clinical decisions on cfDNA measurements, normal reference intervals are essential to avoid that ordinary variation i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ørntoft, Mai‐Britt Worm, Jensen, Sarah Østrup, Øgaard, Nadia, Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman, Ferm, Linnea, Christensen, Ib Jarle, Reinert, Thomas, Larsen, Ole Halfdan, Nielsen, Hans Jørgen, Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33320961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33434
_version_ 1783653963574280192
author Ørntoft, Mai‐Britt Worm
Jensen, Sarah Østrup
Øgaard, Nadia
Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman
Ferm, Linnea
Christensen, Ib Jarle
Reinert, Thomas
Larsen, Ole Halfdan
Nielsen, Hans Jørgen
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
author_facet Ørntoft, Mai‐Britt Worm
Jensen, Sarah Østrup
Øgaard, Nadia
Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman
Ferm, Linnea
Christensen, Ib Jarle
Reinert, Thomas
Larsen, Ole Halfdan
Nielsen, Hans Jørgen
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
author_sort Ørntoft, Mai‐Britt Worm
collection PubMed
description Circulating cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) has spurred much interest as a biomarker in oncology. However, inter‐ and intra‐individual cfDNA levels vary greatly. Consequently, in order to base clinical decisions on cfDNA measurements, normal reference intervals are essential to avoid that ordinary variation is confused with clinically relevant change. The lack of reference intervals may potentially explain the ambiguous results reported in the field. Our study aimed to establish reference intervals and to evaluate the association between cfDNA and demographic and clinical variables, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Plasma samples and clinical data from 2817 subjects were collected including 1930 noncancer individuals and 887 CRC patients. cfDNA was measured using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The large cohort combined with robust cfDNA quantification enabled establishment of reference intervals (<67 years: 775‐4860 copies/mL; ≥67 years: 807‐6561 copies/mL). A cfDNA level above the age‐stratified 90% percentile was prognostic of reduced survival in both noncancer individuals and CRC patients, with HR values of 2.56 and 2.01, respectively. Moreover, cfDNA levels increased significantly with age, elevated BMI and chronic diseases. In CRC, the cfDNA level was increased for Stage IV, but not Stage I to Stage III cancer. In summary, the use of reference intervals revealed that high cfDNA levels were predictive of shorter survival in both noncancer individuals and CRC patients, and that CRC development did not affect the cfDNA level until metastatic dissemination. Furthermore, cfDNA levels were impacted by age and chronic diseases. Conclusively, our study presents reference intervals that will help pave the way for clinical utilization of cfDNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7898909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78989092021-03-03 Age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer Ørntoft, Mai‐Britt Worm Jensen, Sarah Østrup Øgaard, Nadia Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman Ferm, Linnea Christensen, Ib Jarle Reinert, Thomas Larsen, Ole Halfdan Nielsen, Hans Jørgen Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg Int J Cancer Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics Circulating cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) has spurred much interest as a biomarker in oncology. However, inter‐ and intra‐individual cfDNA levels vary greatly. Consequently, in order to base clinical decisions on cfDNA measurements, normal reference intervals are essential to avoid that ordinary variation is confused with clinically relevant change. The lack of reference intervals may potentially explain the ambiguous results reported in the field. Our study aimed to establish reference intervals and to evaluate the association between cfDNA and demographic and clinical variables, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Plasma samples and clinical data from 2817 subjects were collected including 1930 noncancer individuals and 887 CRC patients. cfDNA was measured using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The large cohort combined with robust cfDNA quantification enabled establishment of reference intervals (<67 years: 775‐4860 copies/mL; ≥67 years: 807‐6561 copies/mL). A cfDNA level above the age‐stratified 90% percentile was prognostic of reduced survival in both noncancer individuals and CRC patients, with HR values of 2.56 and 2.01, respectively. Moreover, cfDNA levels increased significantly with age, elevated BMI and chronic diseases. In CRC, the cfDNA level was increased for Stage IV, but not Stage I to Stage III cancer. In summary, the use of reference intervals revealed that high cfDNA levels were predictive of shorter survival in both noncancer individuals and CRC patients, and that CRC development did not affect the cfDNA level until metastatic dissemination. Furthermore, cfDNA levels were impacted by age and chronic diseases. Conclusively, our study presents reference intervals that will help pave the way for clinical utilization of cfDNA. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-12-21 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7898909/ /pubmed/33320961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33434 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics
Ørntoft, Mai‐Britt Worm
Jensen, Sarah Østrup
Øgaard, Nadia
Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman
Ferm, Linnea
Christensen, Ib Jarle
Reinert, Thomas
Larsen, Ole Halfdan
Nielsen, Hans Jørgen
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
Age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer
title Age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer
title_full Age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer
title_short Age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer
title_sort age‐stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell‐free dna as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer
topic Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33320961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33434
work_keys_str_mv AT ørntoftmaibrittworm agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT jensensarahøstrup agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT øgaardnadia agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT henriksentennavesterman agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT fermlinnea agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT christensenibjarle agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT reinertthomas agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT larsenolehalfdan agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT nielsenhansjørgen agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT andersenclauslindbjerg agestratifiedreferenceintervalsunlocktheclinicalpotentialofcirculatingcellfreednaasabiomarkerofpooroutcomeforhealthyindividualsandpatientswithcolorectalcancer