Cargando…
Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers
BACKGROUND: Comparisons of second‐line anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are sparse. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of anti‐TNF agents compared to vedolizumab as second‐line biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A propensity score‐matched cohort was creat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16193 |
_version_ | 1783653966560624640 |
---|---|
author | Rundquist, Sara Sachs, Michael C. Eriksson, Carl Olén, Ola Montgomery, Scott Halfvarson, Jonas |
author_facet | Rundquist, Sara Sachs, Michael C. Eriksson, Carl Olén, Ola Montgomery, Scott Halfvarson, Jonas |
author_sort | Rundquist, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Comparisons of second‐line anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are sparse. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of anti‐TNF agents compared to vedolizumab as second‐line biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A propensity score‐matched cohort was created using Swedish nationwide registers. Patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, exposed to first‐line anti‐TNF treatment, who initiated a second anti‐TNF agent or vedolizumab in 2014‐2016 (N = 1363) were included. The primary outcome was drug survival at 12 months. Secondarily, we assessed survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation, IBD‐related surgery, antibiotics, or hospitalisation because of infection, and also corticosteroid exposure. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 400 patients (Crohn's disease, N = 198; ulcerative colitis, N = 202) remained. For Crohn's disease, drug survival was 73% in the vedolizumab group vs 74% in the anti‐TNF group (difference: 1 percentage point; 95% confidence interval [CI]:‐11‐13; P = 0.87). Survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation (82% vs 88%), surgery (82% vs 89%), antibiotics (65% vs 71%), hospitalisation due to infection (95% vs 88%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different between groups. For ulcerative colitis, drug survival was 69% in the vedolizumab group vs 62% in the anti‐TNF group (difference: −7 percentage points; 95% CI: −20 to 6; P = 0.30). Vedolizumab‐treated patients had lower survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation (82% vs 93%, P = 0.02). Survival without colectomy (93% vs 97%), antibiotics (81% vs 70%), hospitalisation due to infection (92% vs 92%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Based on Swedish clinical practice, the effectiveness and safety of second‐line anti‐TNF and vedolizumab at 12 months appeared largely similar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7898922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78989222021-03-03 Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers Rundquist, Sara Sachs, Michael C. Eriksson, Carl Olén, Ola Montgomery, Scott Halfvarson, Jonas Aliment Pharmacol Ther Anti‐tnfs Compared with Vedolizumab as Second‐line Biologics in IBD BACKGROUND: Comparisons of second‐line anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are sparse. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of anti‐TNF agents compared to vedolizumab as second‐line biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A propensity score‐matched cohort was created using Swedish nationwide registers. Patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, exposed to first‐line anti‐TNF treatment, who initiated a second anti‐TNF agent or vedolizumab in 2014‐2016 (N = 1363) were included. The primary outcome was drug survival at 12 months. Secondarily, we assessed survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation, IBD‐related surgery, antibiotics, or hospitalisation because of infection, and also corticosteroid exposure. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 400 patients (Crohn's disease, N = 198; ulcerative colitis, N = 202) remained. For Crohn's disease, drug survival was 73% in the vedolizumab group vs 74% in the anti‐TNF group (difference: 1 percentage point; 95% confidence interval [CI]:‐11‐13; P = 0.87). Survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation (82% vs 88%), surgery (82% vs 89%), antibiotics (65% vs 71%), hospitalisation due to infection (95% vs 88%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different between groups. For ulcerative colitis, drug survival was 69% in the vedolizumab group vs 62% in the anti‐TNF group (difference: −7 percentage points; 95% CI: −20 to 6; P = 0.30). Vedolizumab‐treated patients had lower survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation (82% vs 93%, P = 0.02). Survival without colectomy (93% vs 97%), antibiotics (81% vs 70%), hospitalisation due to infection (92% vs 92%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Based on Swedish clinical practice, the effectiveness and safety of second‐line anti‐TNF and vedolizumab at 12 months appeared largely similar. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-19 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7898922/ /pubmed/33340426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16193 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Anti‐tnfs Compared with Vedolizumab as Second‐line Biologics in IBD Rundquist, Sara Sachs, Michael C. Eriksson, Carl Olén, Ola Montgomery, Scott Halfvarson, Jonas Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers |
title | Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers |
title_full | Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers |
title_fullStr | Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers |
title_full_unstemmed | Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers |
title_short | Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers |
title_sort | drug survival of anti‐tnf agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide swedish registers |
topic | Anti‐tnfs Compared with Vedolizumab as Second‐line Biologics in IBD |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rundquistsara drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters AT sachsmichaelc drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters AT erikssoncarl drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters AT olenola drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters AT montgomeryscott drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters AT halfvarsonjonas drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters AT drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters |