Cargando…

Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of second‐line anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are sparse. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of anti‐TNF agents compared to vedolizumab as second‐line biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A propensity score‐matched cohort was creat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rundquist, Sara, Sachs, Michael C., Eriksson, Carl, Olén, Ola, Montgomery, Scott, Halfvarson, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16193
_version_ 1783653966560624640
author Rundquist, Sara
Sachs, Michael C.
Eriksson, Carl
Olén, Ola
Montgomery, Scott
Halfvarson, Jonas
author_facet Rundquist, Sara
Sachs, Michael C.
Eriksson, Carl
Olén, Ola
Montgomery, Scott
Halfvarson, Jonas
author_sort Rundquist, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparisons of second‐line anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are sparse. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of anti‐TNF agents compared to vedolizumab as second‐line biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A propensity score‐matched cohort was created using Swedish nationwide registers. Patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, exposed to first‐line anti‐TNF treatment, who initiated a second anti‐TNF agent or vedolizumab in 2014‐2016 (N = 1363) were included. The primary outcome was drug survival at 12 months. Secondarily, we assessed survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation, IBD‐related surgery, antibiotics, or hospitalisation because of infection, and also corticosteroid exposure. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 400 patients (Crohn's disease, N = 198; ulcerative colitis, N = 202) remained. For Crohn's disease, drug survival was 73% in the vedolizumab group vs 74% in the anti‐TNF group (difference: 1 percentage point; 95% confidence interval [CI]:‐11‐13; P = 0.87). Survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation (82% vs 88%), surgery (82% vs 89%), antibiotics (65% vs 71%), hospitalisation due to infection (95% vs 88%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different between groups. For ulcerative colitis, drug survival was 69% in the vedolizumab group vs 62% in the anti‐TNF group (difference: −7 percentage points; 95% CI: −20 to 6; P = 0.30). Vedolizumab‐treated patients had lower survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation (82% vs 93%, P = 0.02). Survival without colectomy (93% vs 97%), antibiotics (81% vs 70%), hospitalisation due to infection (92% vs 92%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Based on Swedish clinical practice, the effectiveness and safety of second‐line anti‐TNF and vedolizumab at 12 months appeared largely similar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7898922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78989222021-03-03 Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers Rundquist, Sara Sachs, Michael C. Eriksson, Carl Olén, Ola Montgomery, Scott Halfvarson, Jonas Aliment Pharmacol Ther Anti‐tnfs Compared with Vedolizumab as Second‐line Biologics in IBD BACKGROUND: Comparisons of second‐line anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are sparse. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of anti‐TNF agents compared to vedolizumab as second‐line biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A propensity score‐matched cohort was created using Swedish nationwide registers. Patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, exposed to first‐line anti‐TNF treatment, who initiated a second anti‐TNF agent or vedolizumab in 2014‐2016 (N = 1363) were included. The primary outcome was drug survival at 12 months. Secondarily, we assessed survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation, IBD‐related surgery, antibiotics, or hospitalisation because of infection, and also corticosteroid exposure. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 400 patients (Crohn's disease, N = 198; ulcerative colitis, N = 202) remained. For Crohn's disease, drug survival was 73% in the vedolizumab group vs 74% in the anti‐TNF group (difference: 1 percentage point; 95% confidence interval [CI]:‐11‐13; P = 0.87). Survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation (82% vs 88%), surgery (82% vs 89%), antibiotics (65% vs 71%), hospitalisation due to infection (95% vs 88%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different between groups. For ulcerative colitis, drug survival was 69% in the vedolizumab group vs 62% in the anti‐TNF group (difference: −7 percentage points; 95% CI: −20 to 6; P = 0.30). Vedolizumab‐treated patients had lower survival without IBD‐related hospitalisation (82% vs 93%, P = 0.02). Survival without colectomy (93% vs 97%), antibiotics (81% vs 70%), hospitalisation due to infection (92% vs 92%) and corticosteroids (58% vs 48%) were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Based on Swedish clinical practice, the effectiveness and safety of second‐line anti‐TNF and vedolizumab at 12 months appeared largely similar. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-19 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7898922/ /pubmed/33340426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16193 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Anti‐tnfs Compared with Vedolizumab as Second‐line Biologics in IBD
Rundquist, Sara
Sachs, Michael C.
Eriksson, Carl
Olén, Ola
Montgomery, Scott
Halfvarson, Jonas
Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers
title Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers
title_full Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers
title_fullStr Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers
title_full_unstemmed Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers
title_short Drug survival of anti‐TNF agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide Swedish registers
title_sort drug survival of anti‐tnf agents compared with vedolizumab as a second‐line biological treatment in inflammatory bowel disease: results from nationwide swedish registers
topic Anti‐tnfs Compared with Vedolizumab as Second‐line Biologics in IBD
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16193
work_keys_str_mv AT rundquistsara drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters
AT sachsmichaelc drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters
AT erikssoncarl drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters
AT olenola drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters
AT montgomeryscott drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters
AT halfvarsonjonas drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters
AT drugsurvivalofantitnfagentscomparedwithvedolizumabasasecondlinebiologicaltreatmentininflammatoryboweldiseaseresultsfromnationwideswedishregisters