Cargando…
MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up
BACKGROUND: Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November of 2006. Patients in the Core clinical study supporting this approval were followed for 10 years. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, clinical study included primary augmentation, revi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007635 |
_version_ | 1783654013503275008 |
---|---|
author | Caplin, David A. Calobrace, M. Bradley Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Canady, John W. |
author_facet | Caplin, David A. Calobrace, M. Bradley Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Canady, John W. |
author_sort | Caplin, David A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November of 2006. Patients in the Core clinical study supporting this approval were followed for 10 years. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, clinical study included primary augmentation, revision augmentation, primary reconstruction, and revision reconstruction patients implanted with smooth or Siltex Texture MemoryGel Implants. Incidence, severity, and method of resolution for all postoperative complications were assessed on per-patient and per-implant bases. The primary effectiveness endpoints were overall mean change in chest circumference and bra cup size following the implantation procedure. RESULTS: Primary augmentation (n = 552), revision augmentation (n = 145), primary reconstruction (n = 251), and revision reconstruction (n = 60) patients were enrolled in the study. Kaplan-Meier estimated 10-year cumulative incidence rates for key complications at the subject level for Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture were as follows: primary augmentation, 12.1 percent; revision augmentation, 24.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 20.5 percent; and revision reconstruction, 36.9 percent. For infection, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 1.6 percent; revision augmentation, 1.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 6.2 percent; and revision reconstruction, 0 percent. For explantation with or without replacement, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 11.6 percent; revision augmentation, 24.1 percent; primary reconstruction, 33.4 percent; and revision reconstruction; 37.8 percent. For rupture, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 24.2 percent; revision augmentation, 23.7 percent; primary reconstruction, 32.7 percent; and revision reconstruction, 38.7 percent. For any reoperation, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 25.5 percent; revision augmentation, 43.6 percent; primary reconstruction, 49.0 percent; and revision reconstruction, 50.7 percent. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that MemoryGel Implants are safe and effective for use in women undergoing breast augmentation or reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7899226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78992262021-03-01 MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up Caplin, David A. Calobrace, M. Bradley Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Canady, John W. Plast Reconstr Surg Breast: Original Articles BACKGROUND: Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November of 2006. Patients in the Core clinical study supporting this approval were followed for 10 years. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, clinical study included primary augmentation, revision augmentation, primary reconstruction, and revision reconstruction patients implanted with smooth or Siltex Texture MemoryGel Implants. Incidence, severity, and method of resolution for all postoperative complications were assessed on per-patient and per-implant bases. The primary effectiveness endpoints were overall mean change in chest circumference and bra cup size following the implantation procedure. RESULTS: Primary augmentation (n = 552), revision augmentation (n = 145), primary reconstruction (n = 251), and revision reconstruction (n = 60) patients were enrolled in the study. Kaplan-Meier estimated 10-year cumulative incidence rates for key complications at the subject level for Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture were as follows: primary augmentation, 12.1 percent; revision augmentation, 24.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 20.5 percent; and revision reconstruction, 36.9 percent. For infection, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 1.6 percent; revision augmentation, 1.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 6.2 percent; and revision reconstruction, 0 percent. For explantation with or without replacement, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 11.6 percent; revision augmentation, 24.1 percent; primary reconstruction, 33.4 percent; and revision reconstruction; 37.8 percent. For rupture, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 24.2 percent; revision augmentation, 23.7 percent; primary reconstruction, 32.7 percent; and revision reconstruction, 38.7 percent. For any reoperation, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 25.5 percent; revision augmentation, 43.6 percent; primary reconstruction, 49.0 percent; and revision reconstruction, 50.7 percent. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that MemoryGel Implants are safe and effective for use in women undergoing breast augmentation or reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-02 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7899226/ /pubmed/33620918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007635 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast: Original Articles Caplin, David A. Calobrace, M. Bradley Wixtrom, Roger N. Estes, Megan M. Canady, John W. MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up |
title | MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up |
title_full | MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up |
title_short | MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up |
title_sort | memorygel breast implants: final safety and efficacy results after 10 years of follow-up |
topic | Breast: Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caplindavida memorygelbreastimplantsfinalsafetyandefficacyresultsafter10yearsoffollowup AT calobracembradley memorygelbreastimplantsfinalsafetyandefficacyresultsafter10yearsoffollowup AT wixtromrogern memorygelbreastimplantsfinalsafetyandefficacyresultsafter10yearsoffollowup AT estesmeganm memorygelbreastimplantsfinalsafetyandefficacyresultsafter10yearsoffollowup AT canadyjohnw memorygelbreastimplantsfinalsafetyandefficacyresultsafter10yearsoffollowup |