Cargando…

Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities

The wastewater industry is undergoing a paradigm shift from focusing solely on treatment to incorporating concepts aimed at mitigating environmental impacts such as energy and nutrient recovery and water reuse. This study uses life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis to investigate the eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morelli, Ben, Cashman, Sarah, Ma, Xin (Cissy), Turgeon, Jason, Arden, Sam, Garland, Jay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32941165
http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.104
_version_ 1783654015408537600
author Morelli, Ben
Cashman, Sarah
Ma, Xin (Cissy)
Turgeon, Jason
Arden, Sam
Garland, Jay
author_facet Morelli, Ben
Cashman, Sarah
Ma, Xin (Cissy)
Turgeon, Jason
Arden, Sam
Garland, Jay
author_sort Morelli, Ben
collection PubMed
description The wastewater industry is undergoing a paradigm shift from focusing solely on treatment to incorporating concepts aimed at mitigating environmental impacts such as energy and nutrient recovery and water reuse. This study uses life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis to investigate the effect of expanding anaerobic digestion (AD) capacity and adding combined heat and power on environmental and cost indicators at a mid-sized wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) in Massachusetts, USA. Since 2014, Massachusetts has banned the disposal of organic waste from commercial organizations producing more than one ton of material per week. The WWTF’s additional digester capacity allows the co-digestion of municipal solids with a food-based engineered bioslurry due to this ban. Study data were compiled for several AD feedstock quantity and performance scenarios, and compared to a baseline scenario representative of historic plant operations prior to co-digestion. Reductions in environmental impact are demonstrated for six of eight environmental impacts, including global climate change potential and cumulative energy demand. Eutrophication potential increases by 10 percent and 24 percent across assessed scenarios. Water use remains relatively constant across scenarios. Facility energy production increases dramatically with co-digestion, satisfying 100 percent of the WWTF’s thermal energy requirement and producing surplus electricity assuming full AD capacity utilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7899238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78992382021-07-01 Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities Morelli, Ben Cashman, Sarah Ma, Xin (Cissy) Turgeon, Jason Arden, Sam Garland, Jay Water Sci Technol Article The wastewater industry is undergoing a paradigm shift from focusing solely on treatment to incorporating concepts aimed at mitigating environmental impacts such as energy and nutrient recovery and water reuse. This study uses life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis to investigate the effect of expanding anaerobic digestion (AD) capacity and adding combined heat and power on environmental and cost indicators at a mid-sized wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) in Massachusetts, USA. Since 2014, Massachusetts has banned the disposal of organic waste from commercial organizations producing more than one ton of material per week. The WWTF’s additional digester capacity allows the co-digestion of municipal solids with a food-based engineered bioslurry due to this ban. Study data were compiled for several AD feedstock quantity and performance scenarios, and compared to a baseline scenario representative of historic plant operations prior to co-digestion. Reductions in environmental impact are demonstrated for six of eight environmental impacts, including global climate change potential and cumulative energy demand. Eutrophication potential increases by 10 percent and 24 percent across assessed scenarios. Water use remains relatively constant across scenarios. Facility energy production increases dramatically with co-digestion, satisfying 100 percent of the WWTF’s thermal energy requirement and producing surplus electricity assuming full AD capacity utilization. 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7899238/ /pubmed/32941165 http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.104 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Morelli, Ben
Cashman, Sarah
Ma, Xin (Cissy)
Turgeon, Jason
Arden, Sam
Garland, Jay
Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities
title Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities
title_full Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities
title_fullStr Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities
title_full_unstemmed Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities
title_short Environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities
title_sort environmental and cost benefits of co-digesting food waste at wastewater treatment facilities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32941165
http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.104
work_keys_str_mv AT morelliben environmentalandcostbenefitsofcodigestingfoodwasteatwastewatertreatmentfacilities
AT cashmansarah environmentalandcostbenefitsofcodigestingfoodwasteatwastewatertreatmentfacilities
AT maxincissy environmentalandcostbenefitsofcodigestingfoodwasteatwastewatertreatmentfacilities
AT turgeonjason environmentalandcostbenefitsofcodigestingfoodwasteatwastewatertreatmentfacilities
AT ardensam environmentalandcostbenefitsofcodigestingfoodwasteatwastewatertreatmentfacilities
AT garlandjay environmentalandcostbenefitsofcodigestingfoodwasteatwastewatertreatmentfacilities