Cargando…

Exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict

While Australia boasts a high immunization rate, geographical pockets of low uptake still challenge herd immunity on a community level. For some parents, concerns about immunization lead to distrust of conventional sources of vaccine information and complementary medicine (CM) practitioners may be m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frawley, Jane E., McKenzie, Kirsty, Forssman, Bradley L., Sullivan, Elizabeth, Wiley, Kerrie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32966138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1787069
_version_ 1783654066101944320
author Frawley, Jane E.
McKenzie, Kirsty
Forssman, Bradley L.
Sullivan, Elizabeth
Wiley, Kerrie
author_facet Frawley, Jane E.
McKenzie, Kirsty
Forssman, Bradley L.
Sullivan, Elizabeth
Wiley, Kerrie
author_sort Frawley, Jane E.
collection PubMed
description While Australia boasts a high immunization rate, geographical pockets of low uptake still challenge herd immunity on a community level. For some parents, concerns about immunization lead to distrust of conventional sources of vaccine information and complementary medicine (CM) practitioners may be more readily trusted as a source of information about vaccines. Decision aids are common educational resources that are developed to support informed decision making. We interviewed CM practitioners to explore their attitudes to immunization decision aids in general and the acceptability of recommending this resource to parents with concerns or questions about immunization. While some practitioners felt that it might be biased towards immunizations, all said that they would recommend the resource to parents. CM practitioners are a trusted source of information, including immunization advice for some parents. CM practitioners were generally supportive of decision aids as a tool they could use in their practice to help parents with immunization questions, where a premium is often placed on patient choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7899682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78996822021-03-02 Exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict Frawley, Jane E. McKenzie, Kirsty Forssman, Bradley L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Wiley, Kerrie Hum Vaccin Immunother Commentary While Australia boasts a high immunization rate, geographical pockets of low uptake still challenge herd immunity on a community level. For some parents, concerns about immunization lead to distrust of conventional sources of vaccine information and complementary medicine (CM) practitioners may be more readily trusted as a source of information about vaccines. Decision aids are common educational resources that are developed to support informed decision making. We interviewed CM practitioners to explore their attitudes to immunization decision aids in general and the acceptability of recommending this resource to parents with concerns or questions about immunization. While some practitioners felt that it might be biased towards immunizations, all said that they would recommend the resource to parents. CM practitioners are a trusted source of information, including immunization advice for some parents. CM practitioners were generally supportive of decision aids as a tool they could use in their practice to help parents with immunization questions, where a premium is often placed on patient choice. Taylor & Francis 2020-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7899682/ /pubmed/32966138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1787069 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Commentary
Frawley, Jane E.
McKenzie, Kirsty
Forssman, Bradley L.
Sullivan, Elizabeth
Wiley, Kerrie
Exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict
title Exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict
title_full Exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict
title_fullStr Exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict
title_full_unstemmed Exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict
title_short Exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict
title_sort exploring complementary medicine practitioners’ attitudes towards the use of an immunization decision aid, and its potential acceptability for use with clients to reduce vaccine related decisional conflict
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32966138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1787069
work_keys_str_mv AT frawleyjanee exploringcomplementarymedicinepractitionersattitudestowardstheuseofanimmunizationdecisionaidanditspotentialacceptabilityforusewithclientstoreducevaccinerelateddecisionalconflict
AT mckenziekirsty exploringcomplementarymedicinepractitionersattitudestowardstheuseofanimmunizationdecisionaidanditspotentialacceptabilityforusewithclientstoreducevaccinerelateddecisionalconflict
AT forssmanbradleyl exploringcomplementarymedicinepractitionersattitudestowardstheuseofanimmunizationdecisionaidanditspotentialacceptabilityforusewithclientstoreducevaccinerelateddecisionalconflict
AT sullivanelizabeth exploringcomplementarymedicinepractitionersattitudestowardstheuseofanimmunizationdecisionaidanditspotentialacceptabilityforusewithclientstoreducevaccinerelateddecisionalconflict
AT wileykerrie exploringcomplementarymedicinepractitionersattitudestowardstheuseofanimmunizationdecisionaidanditspotentialacceptabilityforusewithclientstoreducevaccinerelateddecisionalconflict