Cargando…

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health

As global health education and training shift toward competency-based approaches, academic institutions and organizations must define appropriate assessment strategies for use across health professions. The authors aim to develop entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for global health to apply...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steeb, David R., Brock, Tina P., Dascanio, Sarah A., Drain, Paul K., Squires, Allison, Thumm, Melissa, Tittle, Robin, Haines, Stuart T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003856
_version_ 1783654071316512768
author Steeb, David R.
Brock, Tina P.
Dascanio, Sarah A.
Drain, Paul K.
Squires, Allison
Thumm, Melissa
Tittle, Robin
Haines, Stuart T.
author_facet Steeb, David R.
Brock, Tina P.
Dascanio, Sarah A.
Drain, Paul K.
Squires, Allison
Thumm, Melissa
Tittle, Robin
Haines, Stuart T.
author_sort Steeb, David R.
collection PubMed
description As global health education and training shift toward competency-based approaches, academic institutions and organizations must define appropriate assessment strategies for use across health professions. The authors aim to develop entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for global health to apply across academic and workplace settings. METHOD: In 2019, the authors invited 55 global health experts from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and public health to participate in a multiround, online Delphi process; 30 (55%) agreed. Experts averaged 17 years of global health experience, and 12 (40%) were from low- to middle-income countries. In round one, participants listed essential global health activities. The authors used in vivo coding for round one responses to develop initial EPA statements. In subsequent rounds, participants used 5-point Likert-type scales to evaluate EPA statements for importance and relevance to global health across health professions. The authors elevated statements that were rated 4 (important/relevant to most) or 5 (very important/relevant to all) by a minimum of 70% of participants (decided a priori) to the final round, during which participants evaluated whether each statement represented an observable unit of work that could be assigned to a trainee. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data analysis. The authors used participant comments to categorize EPA statements into role domains. RESULTS: Twenty-two EPA statements reached at least 70% consensus. The authors categorized these into 5 role domains: partnership developer, capacity builder, data analyzer, equity advocate, and health promoter. Statements in the equity advocate and partnership developer domains had the highest agreement for importance and relevance. Several statements achieved 100% agreement as a unit of work but achieved lower levels of agreement regarding their observability. CONCLUSIONS: EPAs for global health may be useful to academic institutions and other organizations to guide the assessment of trainees within education and training programs across health professions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7899746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78997462021-03-01 Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health Steeb, David R. Brock, Tina P. Dascanio, Sarah A. Drain, Paul K. Squires, Allison Thumm, Melissa Tittle, Robin Haines, Stuart T. Acad Med Research Reports As global health education and training shift toward competency-based approaches, academic institutions and organizations must define appropriate assessment strategies for use across health professions. The authors aim to develop entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for global health to apply across academic and workplace settings. METHOD: In 2019, the authors invited 55 global health experts from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and public health to participate in a multiround, online Delphi process; 30 (55%) agreed. Experts averaged 17 years of global health experience, and 12 (40%) were from low- to middle-income countries. In round one, participants listed essential global health activities. The authors used in vivo coding for round one responses to develop initial EPA statements. In subsequent rounds, participants used 5-point Likert-type scales to evaluate EPA statements for importance and relevance to global health across health professions. The authors elevated statements that were rated 4 (important/relevant to most) or 5 (very important/relevant to all) by a minimum of 70% of participants (decided a priori) to the final round, during which participants evaluated whether each statement represented an observable unit of work that could be assigned to a trainee. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data analysis. The authors used participant comments to categorize EPA statements into role domains. RESULTS: Twenty-two EPA statements reached at least 70% consensus. The authors categorized these into 5 role domains: partnership developer, capacity builder, data analyzer, equity advocate, and health promoter. Statements in the equity advocate and partnership developer domains had the highest agreement for importance and relevance. Several statements achieved 100% agreement as a unit of work but achieved lower levels of agreement regarding their observability. CONCLUSIONS: EPAs for global health may be useful to academic institutions and other organizations to guide the assessment of trainees within education and training programs across health professions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-24 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7899746/ /pubmed/33239533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003856 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Association of American Medical Colleges. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Steeb, David R.
Brock, Tina P.
Dascanio, Sarah A.
Drain, Paul K.
Squires, Allison
Thumm, Melissa
Tittle, Robin
Haines, Stuart T.
Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health
title Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health
title_full Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health
title_fullStr Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health
title_full_unstemmed Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health
title_short Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Global Health
title_sort entrustable professional activities (epas) for global health
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003856
work_keys_str_mv AT steebdavidr entrustableprofessionalactivitiesepasforglobalhealth
AT brocktinap entrustableprofessionalactivitiesepasforglobalhealth
AT dascaniosaraha entrustableprofessionalactivitiesepasforglobalhealth
AT drainpaulk entrustableprofessionalactivitiesepasforglobalhealth
AT squiresallison entrustableprofessionalactivitiesepasforglobalhealth
AT thummmelissa entrustableprofessionalactivitiesepasforglobalhealth
AT tittlerobin entrustableprofessionalactivitiesepasforglobalhealth
AT hainesstuartt entrustableprofessionalactivitiesepasforglobalhealth