Cargando…
A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies
A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial and four postmarket user acceptance investigations were carried out to document the safety, performance, and user acceptance of Efemia Bladder Support, a novel vaginal inlay for the temporary reduction of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The cli...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8822186 |
_version_ | 1783654073717751808 |
---|---|
author | Jonasson, Aino Fianu Bryder, Karin Sthengel, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Jonasson, Aino Fianu Bryder, Karin Sthengel, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Jonasson, Aino Fianu |
collection | PubMed |
description | A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial and four postmarket user acceptance investigations were carried out to document the safety, performance, and user acceptance of Efemia Bladder Support, a novel vaginal inlay for the temporary reduction of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The clinical investigation enrolled 97 women diagnosed with SUI, randomized 3 : 1 to either treatment or standard care (control). The primary endpoint was reduction of urine leakage, measured as change in pad weight baseline week compared with treatment week. Secondary endpoints were treatment success, calculated as the percentage of subjects with >70% reduction in pad weight, reduction in incontinence episodes, and quality of life (QoL). 75 women (77%) completed the clinical investigation. No serious adverse events occurred. The treatment group reached a 55% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of total leakage compared to the control arm. A subanalysis, involving only leakage during provocation testing (coughing and jumping), showed a 67% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of leakage. No significant effect on QoL could be observed. 51% of the women answered “yes” to the question if they would use the device to reduce SUI. The user acceptance of the device was further investigated in four postmarket studies, using an improved device design with a slimmer centerpiece and a thinner handle, while keeping the effect achieving parts of the device unchanged. An average of 74% of the 102 participants in the postmarket studies reported that they were likely to continue using Efemia. The highest user satisfaction was seen in the two studies evaluating the use of Efemia during exercise, where 83% and 88% of the women were likely to continue using Efemia. It can be concluded that Efemia is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective alternative for reducing SUI, both in everyday life and during physical exercise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7899758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78997582021-02-23 A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies Jonasson, Aino Fianu Bryder, Karin Sthengel, Elisabeth Adv Urol Research Article A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial and four postmarket user acceptance investigations were carried out to document the safety, performance, and user acceptance of Efemia Bladder Support, a novel vaginal inlay for the temporary reduction of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The clinical investigation enrolled 97 women diagnosed with SUI, randomized 3 : 1 to either treatment or standard care (control). The primary endpoint was reduction of urine leakage, measured as change in pad weight baseline week compared with treatment week. Secondary endpoints were treatment success, calculated as the percentage of subjects with >70% reduction in pad weight, reduction in incontinence episodes, and quality of life (QoL). 75 women (77%) completed the clinical investigation. No serious adverse events occurred. The treatment group reached a 55% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of total leakage compared to the control arm. A subanalysis, involving only leakage during provocation testing (coughing and jumping), showed a 67% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of leakage. No significant effect on QoL could be observed. 51% of the women answered “yes” to the question if they would use the device to reduce SUI. The user acceptance of the device was further investigated in four postmarket studies, using an improved device design with a slimmer centerpiece and a thinner handle, while keeping the effect achieving parts of the device unchanged. An average of 74% of the 102 participants in the postmarket studies reported that they were likely to continue using Efemia. The highest user satisfaction was seen in the two studies evaluating the use of Efemia during exercise, where 83% and 88% of the women were likely to continue using Efemia. It can be concluded that Efemia is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective alternative for reducing SUI, both in everyday life and during physical exercise. Hindawi 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7899758/ /pubmed/33628229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8822186 Text en Copyright © 2021 Aino Fianu Jonasson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jonasson, Aino Fianu Bryder, Karin Sthengel, Elisabeth A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies |
title | A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies |
title_full | A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies |
title_fullStr | A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies |
title_short | A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies |
title_sort | vaginal inlay for reduction of stress urinary incontinence: outcome of a randomized clinical trial and four user acceptance studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8822186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonassonainofianu avaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies AT bryderkarin avaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies AT sthengelelisabeth avaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies AT jonassonainofianu vaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies AT bryderkarin vaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies AT sthengelelisabeth vaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies |