Cargando…

A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies

A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial and four postmarket user acceptance investigations were carried out to document the safety, performance, and user acceptance of Efemia Bladder Support, a novel vaginal inlay for the temporary reduction of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jonasson, Aino Fianu, Bryder, Karin, Sthengel, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8822186
_version_ 1783654073717751808
author Jonasson, Aino Fianu
Bryder, Karin
Sthengel, Elisabeth
author_facet Jonasson, Aino Fianu
Bryder, Karin
Sthengel, Elisabeth
author_sort Jonasson, Aino Fianu
collection PubMed
description A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial and four postmarket user acceptance investigations were carried out to document the safety, performance, and user acceptance of Efemia Bladder Support, a novel vaginal inlay for the temporary reduction of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The clinical investigation enrolled 97 women diagnosed with SUI, randomized 3 : 1 to either treatment or standard care (control). The primary endpoint was reduction of urine leakage, measured as change in pad weight baseline week compared with treatment week. Secondary endpoints were treatment success, calculated as the percentage of subjects with >70% reduction in pad weight, reduction in incontinence episodes, and quality of life (QoL). 75 women (77%) completed the clinical investigation. No serious adverse events occurred. The treatment group reached a 55% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of total leakage compared to the control arm. A subanalysis, involving only leakage during provocation testing (coughing and jumping), showed a 67% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of leakage. No significant effect on QoL could be observed. 51% of the women answered “yes” to the question if they would use the device to reduce SUI. The user acceptance of the device was further investigated in four postmarket studies, using an improved device design with a slimmer centerpiece and a thinner handle, while keeping the effect achieving parts of the device unchanged. An average of 74% of the 102 participants in the postmarket studies reported that they were likely to continue using Efemia. The highest user satisfaction was seen in the two studies evaluating the use of Efemia during exercise, where 83% and 88% of the women were likely to continue using Efemia. It can be concluded that Efemia is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective alternative for reducing SUI, both in everyday life and during physical exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7899758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78997582021-02-23 A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies Jonasson, Aino Fianu Bryder, Karin Sthengel, Elisabeth Adv Urol Research Article A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial and four postmarket user acceptance investigations were carried out to document the safety, performance, and user acceptance of Efemia Bladder Support, a novel vaginal inlay for the temporary reduction of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The clinical investigation enrolled 97 women diagnosed with SUI, randomized 3 : 1 to either treatment or standard care (control). The primary endpoint was reduction of urine leakage, measured as change in pad weight baseline week compared with treatment week. Secondary endpoints were treatment success, calculated as the percentage of subjects with >70% reduction in pad weight, reduction in incontinence episodes, and quality of life (QoL). 75 women (77%) completed the clinical investigation. No serious adverse events occurred. The treatment group reached a 55% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of total leakage compared to the control arm. A subanalysis, involving only leakage during provocation testing (coughing and jumping), showed a 67% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of leakage. No significant effect on QoL could be observed. 51% of the women answered “yes” to the question if they would use the device to reduce SUI. The user acceptance of the device was further investigated in four postmarket studies, using an improved device design with a slimmer centerpiece and a thinner handle, while keeping the effect achieving parts of the device unchanged. An average of 74% of the 102 participants in the postmarket studies reported that they were likely to continue using Efemia. The highest user satisfaction was seen in the two studies evaluating the use of Efemia during exercise, where 83% and 88% of the women were likely to continue using Efemia. It can be concluded that Efemia is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective alternative for reducing SUI, both in everyday life and during physical exercise. Hindawi 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7899758/ /pubmed/33628229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8822186 Text en Copyright © 2021 Aino Fianu Jonasson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jonasson, Aino Fianu
Bryder, Karin
Sthengel, Elisabeth
A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies
title A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies
title_full A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies
title_fullStr A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies
title_full_unstemmed A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies
title_short A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies
title_sort vaginal inlay for reduction of stress urinary incontinence: outcome of a randomized clinical trial and four user acceptance studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8822186
work_keys_str_mv AT jonassonainofianu avaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies
AT bryderkarin avaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies
AT sthengelelisabeth avaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies
AT jonassonainofianu vaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies
AT bryderkarin vaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies
AT sthengelelisabeth vaginalinlayforreductionofstressurinaryincontinenceoutcomeofarandomizedclinicaltrialandfouruseracceptancestudies