Cargando…
Automated Identification of Common Disease-Specific Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research Using ClinicalTrials.gov: Algorithm Development and Validation Study
BACKGROUND: Common disease-specific outcomes are vital for ensuring comparability of clinical trial data and enabling meta analyses and interstudy comparisons. Traditionally, the process of deciding which outcomes should be recommended as common for a particular disease relied on assembling and surv...
Autores principales: | Elghafari, Anas, Finkelstein, Joseph |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33460388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18298 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Empirical Study of Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Bourgeois, Florence T., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
How to avoid common problems when using ClinicalTrials.gov in research: 10 issues to consider
por: Tse, Tony, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Some data quality issues at ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Chaturvedi, Neha, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Obstacles to the reuse of study metadata in ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Miron, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparative Analysis of Geriatric and Adult Drug Clinical Trials on ClinicalTrials.gov
por: He, Zhe, et al.
Publicado: (2017)