Cargando…

Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, and intravenous fluid preloading is a preventive measure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of colloids versus crystalloids for preloading to reduce the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shang, Yuchao, Li, Huafeng, Ma, Junmei, Tan, Ling, Li, Shuying, Li, Ping, Sheng, Bo, Wang, Rurong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33607794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024607
_version_ 1783654105900646400
author Shang, Yuchao
Li, Huafeng
Ma, Junmei
Tan, Ling
Li, Shuying
Li, Ping
Sheng, Bo
Wang, Rurong
author_facet Shang, Yuchao
Li, Huafeng
Ma, Junmei
Tan, Ling
Li, Shuying
Li, Ping
Sheng, Bo
Wang, Rurong
author_sort Shang, Yuchao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, and intravenous fluid preloading is a preventive measure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of colloids versus crystalloids for preloading to reduce the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension and vasopressor requirement in healthy parturients during elective cesarean delivery. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all studies published to June, 2019, through OVID and PubMed. We included randomized controlled trials, comparing colloid preloading with crystalloid preloading in women having spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Primary outcomes were the incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirement. Secondary outcomes included nausea and/or vomiting, neonatal Apgar score, neonatal umbilical blood pH. We used standardized mean differences for expressing continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes. Random-effect model was performed to estimate the pooled risk ratios and standardized mean differences. RESULTS: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials contributed data for this meta-analysis. Fewer women experienced hypotension in the colloid group compared with the crystalloid group (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.63–0.82; 2566 women, 32 studies; P < .00001). The total ephedrine dose required was significantly lower with colloid preloading (standardized mean difference: −0.37, 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.09; 1472 women, 19 studies; P = .009). Colloid preloading was also associated with fewer phenylephrine requirement compared with crystalloid preloading (standardized mean difference: -0.54, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.25; 169 women; P = .0002). The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting was significantly reduced with colloid preloading (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55–0.95; 1601 women, 20 studies; P = .02). However, the incidence of 1-minute Apgar score < 7, umbilical artery pH < 7.2 and umbilical vein pH < 7.2 were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Colloid preloading is superior to crystalloid preloading in reducing the incidence of hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia and vasopressor requirement in the healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018096402.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7899897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78998972021-02-24 Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Shang, Yuchao Li, Huafeng Ma, Junmei Tan, Ling Li, Shuying Li, Ping Sheng, Bo Wang, Rurong Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, and intravenous fluid preloading is a preventive measure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of colloids versus crystalloids for preloading to reduce the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension and vasopressor requirement in healthy parturients during elective cesarean delivery. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all studies published to June, 2019, through OVID and PubMed. We included randomized controlled trials, comparing colloid preloading with crystalloid preloading in women having spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Primary outcomes were the incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirement. Secondary outcomes included nausea and/or vomiting, neonatal Apgar score, neonatal umbilical blood pH. We used standardized mean differences for expressing continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes. Random-effect model was performed to estimate the pooled risk ratios and standardized mean differences. RESULTS: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials contributed data for this meta-analysis. Fewer women experienced hypotension in the colloid group compared with the crystalloid group (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.63–0.82; 2566 women, 32 studies; P < .00001). The total ephedrine dose required was significantly lower with colloid preloading (standardized mean difference: −0.37, 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.09; 1472 women, 19 studies; P = .009). Colloid preloading was also associated with fewer phenylephrine requirement compared with crystalloid preloading (standardized mean difference: -0.54, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.25; 169 women; P = .0002). The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting was significantly reduced with colloid preloading (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55–0.95; 1601 women, 20 studies; P = .02). However, the incidence of 1-minute Apgar score < 7, umbilical artery pH < 7.2 and umbilical vein pH < 7.2 were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Colloid preloading is superior to crystalloid preloading in reducing the incidence of hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia and vasopressor requirement in the healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018096402. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7899897/ /pubmed/33607794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024607 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 3300
Shang, Yuchao
Li, Huafeng
Ma, Junmei
Tan, Ling
Li, Shuying
Li, Ping
Sheng, Bo
Wang, Rurong
Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33607794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024607
work_keys_str_mv AT shangyuchao colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihuafeng colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT majunmei colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tanling colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lishuying colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liping colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shengbo colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangrurong colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis