Cargando…
Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, and intravenous fluid preloading is a preventive measure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of colloids versus crystalloids for preloading to reduce the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33607794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024607 |
_version_ | 1783654105900646400 |
---|---|
author | Shang, Yuchao Li, Huafeng Ma, Junmei Tan, Ling Li, Shuying Li, Ping Sheng, Bo Wang, Rurong |
author_facet | Shang, Yuchao Li, Huafeng Ma, Junmei Tan, Ling Li, Shuying Li, Ping Sheng, Bo Wang, Rurong |
author_sort | Shang, Yuchao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, and intravenous fluid preloading is a preventive measure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of colloids versus crystalloids for preloading to reduce the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension and vasopressor requirement in healthy parturients during elective cesarean delivery. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all studies published to June, 2019, through OVID and PubMed. We included randomized controlled trials, comparing colloid preloading with crystalloid preloading in women having spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Primary outcomes were the incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirement. Secondary outcomes included nausea and/or vomiting, neonatal Apgar score, neonatal umbilical blood pH. We used standardized mean differences for expressing continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes. Random-effect model was performed to estimate the pooled risk ratios and standardized mean differences. RESULTS: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials contributed data for this meta-analysis. Fewer women experienced hypotension in the colloid group compared with the crystalloid group (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.63–0.82; 2566 women, 32 studies; P < .00001). The total ephedrine dose required was significantly lower with colloid preloading (standardized mean difference: −0.37, 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.09; 1472 women, 19 studies; P = .009). Colloid preloading was also associated with fewer phenylephrine requirement compared with crystalloid preloading (standardized mean difference: -0.54, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.25; 169 women; P = .0002). The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting was significantly reduced with colloid preloading (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55–0.95; 1601 women, 20 studies; P = .02). However, the incidence of 1-minute Apgar score < 7, umbilical artery pH < 7.2 and umbilical vein pH < 7.2 were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Colloid preloading is superior to crystalloid preloading in reducing the incidence of hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia and vasopressor requirement in the healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018096402. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7899897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78998972021-02-24 Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Shang, Yuchao Li, Huafeng Ma, Junmei Tan, Ling Li, Shuying Li, Ping Sheng, Bo Wang, Rurong Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, and intravenous fluid preloading is a preventive measure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of colloids versus crystalloids for preloading to reduce the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension and vasopressor requirement in healthy parturients during elective cesarean delivery. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all studies published to June, 2019, through OVID and PubMed. We included randomized controlled trials, comparing colloid preloading with crystalloid preloading in women having spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Primary outcomes were the incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirement. Secondary outcomes included nausea and/or vomiting, neonatal Apgar score, neonatal umbilical blood pH. We used standardized mean differences for expressing continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes. Random-effect model was performed to estimate the pooled risk ratios and standardized mean differences. RESULTS: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials contributed data for this meta-analysis. Fewer women experienced hypotension in the colloid group compared with the crystalloid group (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.63–0.82; 2566 women, 32 studies; P < .00001). The total ephedrine dose required was significantly lower with colloid preloading (standardized mean difference: −0.37, 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.09; 1472 women, 19 studies; P = .009). Colloid preloading was also associated with fewer phenylephrine requirement compared with crystalloid preloading (standardized mean difference: -0.54, 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.25; 169 women; P = .0002). The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting was significantly reduced with colloid preloading (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55–0.95; 1601 women, 20 studies; P = .02). However, the incidence of 1-minute Apgar score < 7, umbilical artery pH < 7.2 and umbilical vein pH < 7.2 were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Colloid preloading is superior to crystalloid preloading in reducing the incidence of hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia and vasopressor requirement in the healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018096402. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7899897/ /pubmed/33607794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024607 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 3300 Shang, Yuchao Li, Huafeng Ma, Junmei Tan, Ling Li, Shuying Li, Ping Sheng, Bo Wang, Rurong Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33607794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024607 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shangyuchao colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lihuafeng colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT majunmei colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanling colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lishuying colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liping colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shengbo colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangrurong colloidpreloadingversuscrystalloidpreloadingtopreventhypotensionafterspinalanesthesiaforcesareandeliveryaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |