Cargando…
Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of a deep learning (DL) model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases, in which a neural network is trained on four distinct MRI sequences using an input-level dropout layer, thus simulating the scenario of missing MRI s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00398-4 |
_version_ | 1783654153259581440 |
---|---|
author | Grøvik, Endre Yi, Darvin Iv, Michael Tong, Elizabeth Nilsen, Line Brennhaug Latysheva, Anna Saxhaug, Cathrine Jacobsen, Kari Dolven Helland, Åslaug Emblem, Kyrre Eeg Rubin, Daniel L. Zaharchuk, Greg |
author_facet | Grøvik, Endre Yi, Darvin Iv, Michael Tong, Elizabeth Nilsen, Line Brennhaug Latysheva, Anna Saxhaug, Cathrine Jacobsen, Kari Dolven Helland, Åslaug Emblem, Kyrre Eeg Rubin, Daniel L. Zaharchuk, Greg |
author_sort | Grøvik, Endre |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of a deep learning (DL) model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases, in which a neural network is trained on four distinct MRI sequences using an input-level dropout layer, thus simulating the scenario of missing MRI sequences by training on the full set and all possible subsets of the input data. This retrospective, multicenter study, evaluated 165 patients with brain metastases. The proposed input-level dropout (ILD) model was trained on multisequence MRI from 100 patients and validated/tested on 10/55 patients, in which the test set was missing one of the four MRI sequences used for training. The segmentation results were compared with the performance of a state-of-the-art DeepLab V3 model. The MR sequences in the training set included pre-gadolinium and post-gadolinium (Gd) T1-weighted 3D fast spin echo, post-Gd T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) prepped fast spoiled gradient echo, and 3D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), whereas the test set did not include the IR prepped image-series. The ground truth segmentations were established by experienced neuroradiologists. The results were evaluated using precision, recall, Intersection over union (IoU)-score and Dice score, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve statistics, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the performance of the two neural networks. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), averaged across all test cases, was 0.989 ± 0.029 for the ILD-model and 0.989 ± 0.023 for the DeepLab V3 model (p = 0.62). The ILD-model showed a significantly higher Dice score (0.795 ± 0.104 vs. 0.774 ± 0.104, p = 0.017), and IoU-score (0.561 ± 0.225 vs. 0.492 ± 0.186, p < 0.001) compared to the DeepLab V3 model, and a significantly lower average false positive rate of 3.6/patient vs. 7.0/patient (p < 0.001) using a 10 mm(3) lesion-size limit. The ILD-model, trained on all possible combinations of four MRI sequences, may facilitate accurate detection and segmentation of brain metastases on a multicenter basis, even when the test cohort is missing input MRI sequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7900111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79001112021-03-05 Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study Grøvik, Endre Yi, Darvin Iv, Michael Tong, Elizabeth Nilsen, Line Brennhaug Latysheva, Anna Saxhaug, Cathrine Jacobsen, Kari Dolven Helland, Åslaug Emblem, Kyrre Eeg Rubin, Daniel L. Zaharchuk, Greg NPJ Digit Med Article The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of a deep learning (DL) model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases, in which a neural network is trained on four distinct MRI sequences using an input-level dropout layer, thus simulating the scenario of missing MRI sequences by training on the full set and all possible subsets of the input data. This retrospective, multicenter study, evaluated 165 patients with brain metastases. The proposed input-level dropout (ILD) model was trained on multisequence MRI from 100 patients and validated/tested on 10/55 patients, in which the test set was missing one of the four MRI sequences used for training. The segmentation results were compared with the performance of a state-of-the-art DeepLab V3 model. The MR sequences in the training set included pre-gadolinium and post-gadolinium (Gd) T1-weighted 3D fast spin echo, post-Gd T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) prepped fast spoiled gradient echo, and 3D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), whereas the test set did not include the IR prepped image-series. The ground truth segmentations were established by experienced neuroradiologists. The results were evaluated using precision, recall, Intersection over union (IoU)-score and Dice score, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve statistics, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the performance of the two neural networks. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), averaged across all test cases, was 0.989 ± 0.029 for the ILD-model and 0.989 ± 0.023 for the DeepLab V3 model (p = 0.62). The ILD-model showed a significantly higher Dice score (0.795 ± 0.104 vs. 0.774 ± 0.104, p = 0.017), and IoU-score (0.561 ± 0.225 vs. 0.492 ± 0.186, p < 0.001) compared to the DeepLab V3 model, and a significantly lower average false positive rate of 3.6/patient vs. 7.0/patient (p < 0.001) using a 10 mm(3) lesion-size limit. The ILD-model, trained on all possible combinations of four MRI sequences, may facilitate accurate detection and segmentation of brain metastases on a multicenter basis, even when the test cohort is missing input MRI sequences. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7900111/ /pubmed/33619361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00398-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Grøvik, Endre Yi, Darvin Iv, Michael Tong, Elizabeth Nilsen, Line Brennhaug Latysheva, Anna Saxhaug, Cathrine Jacobsen, Kari Dolven Helland, Åslaug Emblem, Kyrre Eeg Rubin, Daniel L. Zaharchuk, Greg Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study |
title | Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study |
title_full | Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study |
title_short | Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study |
title_sort | handling missing mri sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00398-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grøvikendre handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT yidarvin handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT ivmichael handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT tongelizabeth handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT nilsenlinebrennhaug handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT latyshevaanna handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT saxhaugcathrine handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT jacobsenkaridolven handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT hellandaslaug handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT emblemkyrreeeg handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT rubindaniell handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy AT zaharchukgreg handlingmissingmrisequencesindeeplearningsegmentationofbrainmetastasesamulticenterstudy |