Cargando…
Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach
In 2012, WHO/FAO ranked 24 foodborne parasites (FBP) using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to provide risk assessors with a basis for prioritising control of highly ranked FBP on the global level. One conclusion was that ranking may differ substantially per region. In Europe, the same methodo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00205 |
_version_ | 1783654241607352320 |
---|---|
author | van der Giessen, Joke Deksne, Gunita Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles Troell, Karin Gomes, Jacinto Sotiraki, Smaragda Rozycki, Miroslaw Kucsera, István Djurković-Djaković, Olgica Robertson, Lucy J. |
author_facet | van der Giessen, Joke Deksne, Gunita Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles Troell, Karin Gomes, Jacinto Sotiraki, Smaragda Rozycki, Miroslaw Kucsera, István Djurković-Djaković, Olgica Robertson, Lucy J. |
author_sort | van der Giessen, Joke |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2012, WHO/FAO ranked 24 foodborne parasites (FBP) using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to provide risk assessors with a basis for prioritising control of highly ranked FBP on the global level. One conclusion was that ranking may differ substantially per region. In Europe, the same methodology was used to rank FBP of relevance for Europe. Of the 24 FBP, the top-five prioritised FBP were identified for Europe as Echinococcus multilocularis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis, E. granulosus, and Cryptosporidium spp., all of which are zoonotic. The objective of the present study was to provide an overview of surveillance and reporting systems in Europe for these top five prioritised FBP in the human and animal populations, to identify gaps, and give recommendations for improvement. Information on the surveillance systems was collected from 35 European countries and analysed according to the five different regions. For most FBP, human surveillance is passive in most countries and regions in Europe and notification differs between countries and regions. Adequate surveillance programmes for these FBP are lacking, except for T. spiralis, which is notifiable in 34 countries with active surveillance in susceptible animals under EU directive. Although human and animal surveillance data are available for the five prioritised FBP, we identified a lack of consistency in surveillance and reporting requirements between national experts and European bodies. Recommendations for improved surveillance systems are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7900597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79005972021-03-03 Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach van der Giessen, Joke Deksne, Gunita Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles Troell, Karin Gomes, Jacinto Sotiraki, Smaragda Rozycki, Miroslaw Kucsera, István Djurković-Djaković, Olgica Robertson, Lucy J. Parasite Epidemiol Control Original Research article In 2012, WHO/FAO ranked 24 foodborne parasites (FBP) using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to provide risk assessors with a basis for prioritising control of highly ranked FBP on the global level. One conclusion was that ranking may differ substantially per region. In Europe, the same methodology was used to rank FBP of relevance for Europe. Of the 24 FBP, the top-five prioritised FBP were identified for Europe as Echinococcus multilocularis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis, E. granulosus, and Cryptosporidium spp., all of which are zoonotic. The objective of the present study was to provide an overview of surveillance and reporting systems in Europe for these top five prioritised FBP in the human and animal populations, to identify gaps, and give recommendations for improvement. Information on the surveillance systems was collected from 35 European countries and analysed according to the five different regions. For most FBP, human surveillance is passive in most countries and regions in Europe and notification differs between countries and regions. Adequate surveillance programmes for these FBP are lacking, except for T. spiralis, which is notifiable in 34 countries with active surveillance in susceptible animals under EU directive. Although human and animal surveillance data are available for the five prioritised FBP, we identified a lack of consistency in surveillance and reporting requirements between national experts and European bodies. Recommendations for improved surveillance systems are discussed. Elsevier 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7900597/ /pubmed/33665388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00205 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of World Federation of Parasitologists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research article van der Giessen, Joke Deksne, Gunita Gómez-Morales, Maria Angeles Troell, Karin Gomes, Jacinto Sotiraki, Smaragda Rozycki, Miroslaw Kucsera, István Djurković-Djaković, Olgica Robertson, Lucy J. Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach |
title | Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach |
title_full | Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach |
title_fullStr | Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach |
title_short | Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach |
title_sort | surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in europe in a one health approach |
topic | Original Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandergiessenjoke surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT deksnegunita surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT gomezmoralesmariaangeles surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT troellkarin surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT gomesjacinto surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT sotirakismaragda surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT rozyckimiroslaw surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT kucseraistvan surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT djurkovicdjakovicolgica surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach AT robertsonlucyj surveillanceoffoodborneparasiticdiseasesineuropeinaonehealthapproach |