Cargando…

How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ring pessaries under continuous use for > 2 years. Our starting hypothesis was that their use without periodic removal, cleaning or replacement for between 24 to 48 months after insertion is safe and effective. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miceli, Alessio, Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel, Dueñas-Díez, José-Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04706-0
_version_ 1783654285794344960
author Miceli, Alessio
Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel
Dueñas-Díez, José-Luis
author_facet Miceli, Alessio
Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel
Dueñas-Díez, José-Luis
author_sort Miceli, Alessio
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ring pessaries under continuous use for > 2 years. Our starting hypothesis was that their use without periodic removal, cleaning or replacement for between 24 to 48 months after insertion is safe and effective. METHODS: This was a prospective observational and descriptive study. One hundred one women who successfully completed the 24 first months of continuous use of a ring pessary were included and monitored for another 24 months. The objectives were to establish the percentage of patients maintaining its use 48 months after insertion, the reasons for discontinuation and the adverse events. Another purpose of this study was to determine the timing of replacement of the vaginal pessary in long-term users. RESULTS: Of the women, 92.1% (93/101) had successful pessary use, and it was discontinued by three patients (2.9%, 3/101); 76.2% (77/101) of the women continued pessary use after the end of the study, and in 16 (15.8%, 16/101) patients, after pessary removal, the prolapse disappeared and did not recur. Forty-five women (48.4%, 45/93) presented some adverse events that required temporary pessary removal. The most common one was an increase in vaginal discharge (73.3%, 33/45). In four women (8.9%, 4/45), the ring pessary was detected embedded in the vaginal epithelium. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous use of a ring pessary can be recommended for 2 years in hysterectomized women and for 4 years in non-hysterectomized women if there are no complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7900800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79008002021-02-23 How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study Miceli, Alessio Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel Dueñas-Díez, José-Luis Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ring pessaries under continuous use for > 2 years. Our starting hypothesis was that their use without periodic removal, cleaning or replacement for between 24 to 48 months after insertion is safe and effective. METHODS: This was a prospective observational and descriptive study. One hundred one women who successfully completed the 24 first months of continuous use of a ring pessary were included and monitored for another 24 months. The objectives were to establish the percentage of patients maintaining its use 48 months after insertion, the reasons for discontinuation and the adverse events. Another purpose of this study was to determine the timing of replacement of the vaginal pessary in long-term users. RESULTS: Of the women, 92.1% (93/101) had successful pessary use, and it was discontinued by three patients (2.9%, 3/101); 76.2% (77/101) of the women continued pessary use after the end of the study, and in 16 (15.8%, 16/101) patients, after pessary removal, the prolapse disappeared and did not recur. Forty-five women (48.4%, 45/93) presented some adverse events that required temporary pessary removal. The most common one was an increase in vaginal discharge (73.3%, 33/45). In four women (8.9%, 4/45), the ring pessary was detected embedded in the vaginal epithelium. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous use of a ring pessary can be recommended for 2 years in hysterectomized women and for 4 years in non-hysterectomized women if there are no complications. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7900800/ /pubmed/33620536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04706-0 Text en © The International Urogynecological Association 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Miceli, Alessio
Fernández-Sánchez, Manuel
Dueñas-Díez, José-Luis
How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study
title How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study
title_full How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study
title_fullStr How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study
title_short How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study
title_sort how often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced pop? a prospective observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33620536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04706-0
work_keys_str_mv AT micelialessio howoftenshouldringpessariesberemovedorchangedinwomenwithadvancedpopaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT fernandezsanchezmanuel howoftenshouldringpessariesberemovedorchangedinwomenwithadvancedpopaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT duenasdiezjoseluis howoftenshouldringpessariesberemovedorchangedinwomenwithadvancedpopaprospectiveobservationalstudy