Cargando…

Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine

BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine is a key framework for the treatment of chronic medical conditions, particularly chronic pain conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid implementation of telehealth services. OBJECTIVE: We present outcomes of a complete and rapid transition to telehealth visit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finn, Michael T. M., Brown, Hannah R., Friedman, Emily R., Kelly, A. Grace, Hansen, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121997361
_version_ 1783654290572705792
author Finn, Michael T. M.
Brown, Hannah R.
Friedman, Emily R.
Kelly, A. Grace
Hansen, Kathryn
author_facet Finn, Michael T. M.
Brown, Hannah R.
Friedman, Emily R.
Kelly, A. Grace
Hansen, Kathryn
author_sort Finn, Michael T. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine is a key framework for the treatment of chronic medical conditions, particularly chronic pain conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid implementation of telehealth services. OBJECTIVE: We present outcomes of a complete and rapid transition to telehealth visits at an outpatient integrative medicine center in the Southeastern United States. METHOD: Patients and administrative staff took surveys comparing telehealth to in-person visits within four weeks of our clinic's transition to telehealth and three months later. Beginning four weeks after the clinic’s telehealth conversion in March 2020, patients who had a telehealth visit at the center completed a survey about their telehealth experience and another survey three months later. RESULTS: Patient quality judgements significantly favored telehealth at baseline, B = .77 [0.29 – 1.25], SE = .25, t(712) = 3.15, p = .002, and increased at three months, B = .27 [–0.03 – 0.57], SE = .15, t(712) = 1.76, p = .079. Telehealth technology usability and distance from the center predicted patient ratings of telehealth favorability. Providers favored in-person visits more than patients, B = –1.00 [–1.56 – –0.44], SE = .29, t(799) = –3.48, p < .001, though did not favor either in-person or telehealth more than the other. Patient discrete choice between telehealth and in-person visits was split at baseline (in-person: n = 86 [54%]; telehealth: n = 73 [46%]), but favored telehealth at three months (in-person: n = 17 [40%]; telehealth: n = 26 [60%]). Overall, discrete choice favored telehealth at follow-up across providers and patients, OR = 2.69 [.1.18 – 6.14], z = 2.36, p = .018. Major qualitative themes highlight telehealth as acceptable and convenient, with some challenges including technological issues. Some felt a loss of interpersonal connection during telehealth visits, while others felt the opposite. CONCLUSION: We report converging mixed-method data on the successful and sustained implementation of telehealth with associated policy and clinical implications during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7900841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79008412021-03-04 Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine Finn, Michael T. M. Brown, Hannah R. Friedman, Emily R. Kelly, A. Grace Hansen, Kathryn Glob Adv Health Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine is a key framework for the treatment of chronic medical conditions, particularly chronic pain conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid implementation of telehealth services. OBJECTIVE: We present outcomes of a complete and rapid transition to telehealth visits at an outpatient integrative medicine center in the Southeastern United States. METHOD: Patients and administrative staff took surveys comparing telehealth to in-person visits within four weeks of our clinic's transition to telehealth and three months later. Beginning four weeks after the clinic’s telehealth conversion in March 2020, patients who had a telehealth visit at the center completed a survey about their telehealth experience and another survey three months later. RESULTS: Patient quality judgements significantly favored telehealth at baseline, B = .77 [0.29 – 1.25], SE = .25, t(712) = 3.15, p = .002, and increased at three months, B = .27 [–0.03 – 0.57], SE = .15, t(712) = 1.76, p = .079. Telehealth technology usability and distance from the center predicted patient ratings of telehealth favorability. Providers favored in-person visits more than patients, B = –1.00 [–1.56 – –0.44], SE = .29, t(799) = –3.48, p < .001, though did not favor either in-person or telehealth more than the other. Patient discrete choice between telehealth and in-person visits was split at baseline (in-person: n = 86 [54%]; telehealth: n = 73 [46%]), but favored telehealth at three months (in-person: n = 17 [40%]; telehealth: n = 26 [60%]). Overall, discrete choice favored telehealth at follow-up across providers and patients, OR = 2.69 [.1.18 – 6.14], z = 2.36, p = .018. Major qualitative themes highlight telehealth as acceptable and convenient, with some challenges including technological issues. Some felt a loss of interpersonal connection during telehealth visits, while others felt the opposite. CONCLUSION: We report converging mixed-method data on the successful and sustained implementation of telehealth with associated policy and clinical implications during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. SAGE Publications 2021-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7900841/ /pubmed/33680574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121997361 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Finn, Michael T. M.
Brown, Hannah R.
Friedman, Emily R.
Kelly, A. Grace
Hansen, Kathryn
Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine
title Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine
title_full Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine
title_fullStr Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine
title_short Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine
title_sort preference for telehealth sustained over three months at an outpatient center for integrative medicine
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121997361
work_keys_str_mv AT finnmichaeltm preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine
AT brownhannahr preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine
AT friedmanemilyr preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine
AT kellyagrace preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine
AT hansenkathryn preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine