Cargando…
Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine
BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine is a key framework for the treatment of chronic medical conditions, particularly chronic pain conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid implementation of telehealth services. OBJECTIVE: We present outcomes of a complete and rapid transition to telehealth visit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121997361 |
_version_ | 1783654290572705792 |
---|---|
author | Finn, Michael T. M. Brown, Hannah R. Friedman, Emily R. Kelly, A. Grace Hansen, Kathryn |
author_facet | Finn, Michael T. M. Brown, Hannah R. Friedman, Emily R. Kelly, A. Grace Hansen, Kathryn |
author_sort | Finn, Michael T. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine is a key framework for the treatment of chronic medical conditions, particularly chronic pain conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid implementation of telehealth services. OBJECTIVE: We present outcomes of a complete and rapid transition to telehealth visits at an outpatient integrative medicine center in the Southeastern United States. METHOD: Patients and administrative staff took surveys comparing telehealth to in-person visits within four weeks of our clinic's transition to telehealth and three months later. Beginning four weeks after the clinic’s telehealth conversion in March 2020, patients who had a telehealth visit at the center completed a survey about their telehealth experience and another survey three months later. RESULTS: Patient quality judgements significantly favored telehealth at baseline, B = .77 [0.29 – 1.25], SE = .25, t(712) = 3.15, p = .002, and increased at three months, B = .27 [–0.03 – 0.57], SE = .15, t(712) = 1.76, p = .079. Telehealth technology usability and distance from the center predicted patient ratings of telehealth favorability. Providers favored in-person visits more than patients, B = –1.00 [–1.56 – –0.44], SE = .29, t(799) = –3.48, p < .001, though did not favor either in-person or telehealth more than the other. Patient discrete choice between telehealth and in-person visits was split at baseline (in-person: n = 86 [54%]; telehealth: n = 73 [46%]), but favored telehealth at three months (in-person: n = 17 [40%]; telehealth: n = 26 [60%]). Overall, discrete choice favored telehealth at follow-up across providers and patients, OR = 2.69 [.1.18 – 6.14], z = 2.36, p = .018. Major qualitative themes highlight telehealth as acceptable and convenient, with some challenges including technological issues. Some felt a loss of interpersonal connection during telehealth visits, while others felt the opposite. CONCLUSION: We report converging mixed-method data on the successful and sustained implementation of telehealth with associated policy and clinical implications during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7900841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79008412021-03-04 Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine Finn, Michael T. M. Brown, Hannah R. Friedman, Emily R. Kelly, A. Grace Hansen, Kathryn Glob Adv Health Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine is a key framework for the treatment of chronic medical conditions, particularly chronic pain conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid implementation of telehealth services. OBJECTIVE: We present outcomes of a complete and rapid transition to telehealth visits at an outpatient integrative medicine center in the Southeastern United States. METHOD: Patients and administrative staff took surveys comparing telehealth to in-person visits within four weeks of our clinic's transition to telehealth and three months later. Beginning four weeks after the clinic’s telehealth conversion in March 2020, patients who had a telehealth visit at the center completed a survey about their telehealth experience and another survey three months later. RESULTS: Patient quality judgements significantly favored telehealth at baseline, B = .77 [0.29 – 1.25], SE = .25, t(712) = 3.15, p = .002, and increased at three months, B = .27 [–0.03 – 0.57], SE = .15, t(712) = 1.76, p = .079. Telehealth technology usability and distance from the center predicted patient ratings of telehealth favorability. Providers favored in-person visits more than patients, B = –1.00 [–1.56 – –0.44], SE = .29, t(799) = –3.48, p < .001, though did not favor either in-person or telehealth more than the other. Patient discrete choice between telehealth and in-person visits was split at baseline (in-person: n = 86 [54%]; telehealth: n = 73 [46%]), but favored telehealth at three months (in-person: n = 17 [40%]; telehealth: n = 26 [60%]). Overall, discrete choice favored telehealth at follow-up across providers and patients, OR = 2.69 [.1.18 – 6.14], z = 2.36, p = .018. Major qualitative themes highlight telehealth as acceptable and convenient, with some challenges including technological issues. Some felt a loss of interpersonal connection during telehealth visits, while others felt the opposite. CONCLUSION: We report converging mixed-method data on the successful and sustained implementation of telehealth with associated policy and clinical implications during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. SAGE Publications 2021-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7900841/ /pubmed/33680574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121997361 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Finn, Michael T. M. Brown, Hannah R. Friedman, Emily R. Kelly, A. Grace Hansen, Kathryn Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine |
title | Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an
Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine |
title_full | Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an
Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine |
title_fullStr | Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an
Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an
Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine |
title_short | Preference for Telehealth Sustained Over Three Months at an
Outpatient Center for Integrative Medicine |
title_sort | preference for telehealth sustained over three months at an
outpatient center for integrative medicine |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121997361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finnmichaeltm preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine AT brownhannahr preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine AT friedmanemilyr preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine AT kellyagrace preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine AT hansenkathryn preferencefortelehealthsustainedoverthreemonthsatanoutpatientcenterforintegrativemedicine |