Cargando…

The Nature and Origins of Sub‐Neptune Size Planets

Planets intermediate in size between the Earth and Neptune, and orbiting closer to their host stars than Mercury does the Sun, are the most common type of planet revealed by exoplanet surveys over the last quarter century. Results from NASA's Kepler mission have revealed a bimodality in the rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bean, Jacob L., Raymond, Sean N., Owen, James E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006639
_version_ 1783654307706437632
author Bean, Jacob L.
Raymond, Sean N.
Owen, James E.
author_facet Bean, Jacob L.
Raymond, Sean N.
Owen, James E.
author_sort Bean, Jacob L.
collection PubMed
description Planets intermediate in size between the Earth and Neptune, and orbiting closer to their host stars than Mercury does the Sun, are the most common type of planet revealed by exoplanet surveys over the last quarter century. Results from NASA's Kepler mission have revealed a bimodality in the radius distribution of these objects, with a relative underabundance of planets between 1.5 and 2.0 [Formula: see text]. This bimodality suggests that sub‐Neptunes are mostly rocky planets that were born with primary atmospheres a few percent by mass accreted from the protoplanetary nebula. Planets above the radius gap were able to retain their atmospheres (“gas‐rich super‐Earths”), while planets below the radius gap lost their atmospheres and are stripped cores (“true super‐Earths”). The mechanism that drives atmospheric loss for these planets remains an outstanding question, with photoevaporation and core‐powered mass loss being the prime candidates. As with the mass‐loss mechanism, there are two contenders for the origins of the solids in sub‐Neptune planets: the migration model involves the growth and migration of embryos from beyond the ice line, while the drift model involves inward‐drifting pebbles that coagulate to form planets close‐in. Atmospheric studies have the potential to break degeneracies in interior structure models and place additional constraints on the origins of these planets. However, most atmospheric characterization efforts have been confounded by aerosols. Observations with upcoming facilities are expected to finally reveal the atmospheric compositions of these worlds, which are arguably the first fundamentally new type of planetary object identified from the study of exoplanets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7900964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79009642021-03-03 The Nature and Origins of Sub‐Neptune Size Planets Bean, Jacob L. Raymond, Sean N. Owen, James E. J Geophys Res Planets Review Article Planets intermediate in size between the Earth and Neptune, and orbiting closer to their host stars than Mercury does the Sun, are the most common type of planet revealed by exoplanet surveys over the last quarter century. Results from NASA's Kepler mission have revealed a bimodality in the radius distribution of these objects, with a relative underabundance of planets between 1.5 and 2.0 [Formula: see text]. This bimodality suggests that sub‐Neptunes are mostly rocky planets that were born with primary atmospheres a few percent by mass accreted from the protoplanetary nebula. Planets above the radius gap were able to retain their atmospheres (“gas‐rich super‐Earths”), while planets below the radius gap lost their atmospheres and are stripped cores (“true super‐Earths”). The mechanism that drives atmospheric loss for these planets remains an outstanding question, with photoevaporation and core‐powered mass loss being the prime candidates. As with the mass‐loss mechanism, there are two contenders for the origins of the solids in sub‐Neptune planets: the migration model involves the growth and migration of embryos from beyond the ice line, while the drift model involves inward‐drifting pebbles that coagulate to form planets close‐in. Atmospheric studies have the potential to break degeneracies in interior structure models and place additional constraints on the origins of these planets. However, most atmospheric characterization efforts have been confounded by aerosols. Observations with upcoming facilities are expected to finally reveal the atmospheric compositions of these worlds, which are arguably the first fundamentally new type of planetary object identified from the study of exoplanets. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-06 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7900964/ /pubmed/33680689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006639 Text en © 2020. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Bean, Jacob L.
Raymond, Sean N.
Owen, James E.
The Nature and Origins of Sub‐Neptune Size Planets
title The Nature and Origins of Sub‐Neptune Size Planets
title_full The Nature and Origins of Sub‐Neptune Size Planets
title_fullStr The Nature and Origins of Sub‐Neptune Size Planets
title_full_unstemmed The Nature and Origins of Sub‐Neptune Size Planets
title_short The Nature and Origins of Sub‐Neptune Size Planets
title_sort nature and origins of sub‐neptune size planets
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006639
work_keys_str_mv AT beanjacobl thenatureandoriginsofsubneptunesizeplanets
AT raymondseann thenatureandoriginsofsubneptunesizeplanets
AT owenjamese thenatureandoriginsofsubneptunesizeplanets
AT beanjacobl natureandoriginsofsubneptunesizeplanets
AT raymondseann natureandoriginsofsubneptunesizeplanets
AT owenjamese natureandoriginsofsubneptunesizeplanets