Cargando…
Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice
The rise in popularity and demand for nonsurgical injectable aesthetic procedures is inherently accompanied by an increase in reported complications, particularly those related to infection. Aseptic technique is under the control of aesthetic practitioners and can be modified to minimize the potenti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.14416 |
_version_ | 1783654310318440448 |
---|---|
author | Murthy, Rachna Eccleston, David Mckeown, Darren Parikh, Apul Shotter, Sophie |
author_facet | Murthy, Rachna Eccleston, David Mckeown, Darren Parikh, Apul Shotter, Sophie |
author_sort | Murthy, Rachna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rise in popularity and demand for nonsurgical injectable aesthetic procedures is inherently accompanied by an increase in reported complications, particularly those related to infection. Aseptic technique is under the control of aesthetic practitioners and can be modified to minimize the potential for cross‐contamination and infection. This should be a key consideration during all clinical procedures, particularly those involving breach of the skin's natural defenses and the use of soft tissue filler. A consensus group of five UK expert aesthetic clinicians were convened to discuss current best practice for aseptic techniques in medical aesthetics. The aim of the consensus group was to recommend a step‐by‐step procedure to achieve optimal aseptic practice in private clinics, and define important considerations for reducing infection risk during the whole patient journey: pre‐, during‐ and postaesthetic procedure. Recommendations were based on current evidence and extensive clinical experience. Various procedure recommendations were made to achieve and maintain a high standard of asepsis and infection control. Guidance was divided into three phases for patients and health care professionals, covering preprocedure (including patient selection), during‐procedure, and postprocedure considerations. Although adherence to standard hospital guidance on handwashing and cleanliness measures is a cornerstone of controlling cross‐contamination, aesthetic clinics carry a high potential risk of infection—particularly as popular treatments with dermal fillers primarily involve the face. This expert consensus guidance recommends procedures to mitigate the potential risks of asepsis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7900975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79009752021-03-03 Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice Murthy, Rachna Eccleston, David Mckeown, Darren Parikh, Apul Shotter, Sophie Dermatol Ther Review Articles The rise in popularity and demand for nonsurgical injectable aesthetic procedures is inherently accompanied by an increase in reported complications, particularly those related to infection. Aseptic technique is under the control of aesthetic practitioners and can be modified to minimize the potential for cross‐contamination and infection. This should be a key consideration during all clinical procedures, particularly those involving breach of the skin's natural defenses and the use of soft tissue filler. A consensus group of five UK expert aesthetic clinicians were convened to discuss current best practice for aseptic techniques in medical aesthetics. The aim of the consensus group was to recommend a step‐by‐step procedure to achieve optimal aseptic practice in private clinics, and define important considerations for reducing infection risk during the whole patient journey: pre‐, during‐ and postaesthetic procedure. Recommendations were based on current evidence and extensive clinical experience. Various procedure recommendations were made to achieve and maintain a high standard of asepsis and infection control. Guidance was divided into three phases for patients and health care professionals, covering preprocedure (including patient selection), during‐procedure, and postprocedure considerations. Although adherence to standard hospital guidance on handwashing and cleanliness measures is a cornerstone of controlling cross‐contamination, aesthetic clinics carry a high potential risk of infection—particularly as popular treatments with dermal fillers primarily involve the face. This expert consensus guidance recommends procedures to mitigate the potential risks of asepsis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-11-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7900975/ /pubmed/33068030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.14416 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Dermatologic Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Murthy, Rachna Eccleston, David Mckeown, Darren Parikh, Apul Shotter, Sophie Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice |
title | Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice |
title_full | Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice |
title_short | Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice |
title_sort | improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7900975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.14416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murthyrachna improvingasepticinjectionstandardsinaestheticclinicalpractice AT ecclestondavid improvingasepticinjectionstandardsinaestheticclinicalpractice AT mckeowndarren improvingasepticinjectionstandardsinaestheticclinicalpractice AT parikhapul improvingasepticinjectionstandardsinaestheticclinicalpractice AT shottersophie improvingasepticinjectionstandardsinaestheticclinicalpractice |