Cargando…

Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Risk indices such as the pancreas donor risk index (PDRI) and pre-procurement pancreas allocation suitability score (P-PASS) are utilised in solid pancreas transplantation however no review has compared all derived and validated indices in this field. We systematically reviewed all risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ling, Jonathan E. H., Coughlan, Timothy, Polkinghorne, Kevan R., Kanellis, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01655-2
_version_ 1783654330623066112
author Ling, Jonathan E. H.
Coughlan, Timothy
Polkinghorne, Kevan R.
Kanellis, John
author_facet Ling, Jonathan E. H.
Coughlan, Timothy
Polkinghorne, Kevan R.
Kanellis, John
author_sort Ling, Jonathan E. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk indices such as the pancreas donor risk index (PDRI) and pre-procurement pancreas allocation suitability score (P-PASS) are utilised in solid pancreas transplantation however no review has compared all derived and validated indices in this field. We systematically reviewed all risk indices in solid pancreas transplantation to compare their predictive ability for transplant outcomes. METHODS: Medline Plus, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies deriving and externally validating risk indices in solid pancreas transplantation for the outcomes of pancreas and patient survival and donor pancreas acceptance for transplantation. Results were analysed descriptively due to limited reporting of discrimination and calibration metrics required to assess model performance. RESULTS: From 25 included studies, discrimination and calibration metrics were only reported in 88% and 38% of derivation studies (n = 8) and in 25% and 25% of external validation studies (n = 12) respectively. 21 risk indices were derived with mild to moderate ability to predict risk (C-statistics 0.52–0.78). Donor age, donor body mass index (BMI) and donor gender were the commonest covariates within derived risk indices. Only PDRI and P-PASS were subsequently externally validated, with variable association with post-transplant outcomes. P-PASS was not associated with pancreas graft survival. CONCLUSION: Most of the risk indices derived for use in solid pancreas transplantation were not externally validated (90%). PDRI and P-PASS are the only risk indices externally validated for solid pancreas transplantation, and when validated without reclassification measures, are associated with 1-year pancreas graft survival and donor pancreas acceptance respectively. Future risk indices incorporating recipient and other covariates alongside donor risk factors may have improved predictive ability for solid pancreas transplant outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7901078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79010782021-02-23 Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review Ling, Jonathan E. H. Coughlan, Timothy Polkinghorne, Kevan R. Kanellis, John BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Risk indices such as the pancreas donor risk index (PDRI) and pre-procurement pancreas allocation suitability score (P-PASS) are utilised in solid pancreas transplantation however no review has compared all derived and validated indices in this field. We systematically reviewed all risk indices in solid pancreas transplantation to compare their predictive ability for transplant outcomes. METHODS: Medline Plus, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies deriving and externally validating risk indices in solid pancreas transplantation for the outcomes of pancreas and patient survival and donor pancreas acceptance for transplantation. Results were analysed descriptively due to limited reporting of discrimination and calibration metrics required to assess model performance. RESULTS: From 25 included studies, discrimination and calibration metrics were only reported in 88% and 38% of derivation studies (n = 8) and in 25% and 25% of external validation studies (n = 12) respectively. 21 risk indices were derived with mild to moderate ability to predict risk (C-statistics 0.52–0.78). Donor age, donor body mass index (BMI) and donor gender were the commonest covariates within derived risk indices. Only PDRI and P-PASS were subsequently externally validated, with variable association with post-transplant outcomes. P-PASS was not associated with pancreas graft survival. CONCLUSION: Most of the risk indices derived for use in solid pancreas transplantation were not externally validated (90%). PDRI and P-PASS are the only risk indices externally validated for solid pancreas transplantation, and when validated without reclassification measures, are associated with 1-year pancreas graft survival and donor pancreas acceptance respectively. Future risk indices incorporating recipient and other covariates alongside donor risk factors may have improved predictive ability for solid pancreas transplant outcomes. BioMed Central 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7901078/ /pubmed/33622257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01655-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ling, Jonathan E. H.
Coughlan, Timothy
Polkinghorne, Kevan R.
Kanellis, John
Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review
title Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review
title_full Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review
title_fullStr Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review
title_short Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review
title_sort risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01655-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lingjonathaneh riskindicespredictinggraftusegraftandpatientsurvivalinsolidpancreastransplantationasystematicreview
AT coughlantimothy riskindicespredictinggraftusegraftandpatientsurvivalinsolidpancreastransplantationasystematicreview
AT polkinghornekevanr riskindicespredictinggraftusegraftandpatientsurvivalinsolidpancreastransplantationasystematicreview
AT kanellisjohn riskindicespredictinggraftusegraftandpatientsurvivalinsolidpancreastransplantationasystematicreview