Cargando…

Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe profound hearing loss could benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). However, the neural mechanism of such benefit is still unclear. Therefore, we analyzed the electroencephalogram (EEG) and behavioral indicators of auditory function remodeling in patients with CI. B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Songjian, Lin, Meng, Sun, Liwei, Chen, Xueqing, Fu, Xinxing, Yan, LiLi, Li, Chunlin, Zhang, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633529
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.624484
_version_ 1783654449644830720
author Wang, Songjian
Lin, Meng
Sun, Liwei
Chen, Xueqing
Fu, Xinxing
Yan, LiLi
Li, Chunlin
Zhang, Xu
author_facet Wang, Songjian
Lin, Meng
Sun, Liwei
Chen, Xueqing
Fu, Xinxing
Yan, LiLi
Li, Chunlin
Zhang, Xu
author_sort Wang, Songjian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with severe profound hearing loss could benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). However, the neural mechanism of such benefit is still unclear. Therefore, we analyzed the electroencephalogram (EEG) and behavioral indicators of auditory function remodeling in patients with CI. Both indicators were sampled at multiple time points after implantation (1, 90, and 180 days). METHODS: First, the speech perception ability was evaluated with the recording of a list of Chinese words and sentences in 15 healthy controls (HC group) and 10 patients with CI (CI group). EEG data were collected using an oddball paradigm. Then, the characteristics of event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negative (MMN) were compared between the CI group and the HC group. In addition, we analyzed the phase lag indices (PLI) in the CI group and the HC group and calculated the difference in functional connectivity between the two groups at different stages after implantation. RESULTS: The behavioral indicator, speech recognition ability, in CI patients improved as the implantation time increased. The MMN analysis showed that CI patients could recognize the difference between standard and deviation stimuli just like the HCs 90 days after cochlear implantation. Comparing the latencies of N1/P2/MMN between the CI group and the HC group, we found that the latency of N1/P2 in CI patients was longer, while the latency of MMN in CI users was shorter. In addition, PLI-based whole-brain functional connectivity (PLI-FC) showed that the difference between the CI group and the HC group mainly exists in electrode pairs between the bilateral auditory area and the frontal area. Furthermore, all those differences gradually decreased with the increase in implantation time. CONCLUSION: The N1 amplitude, N1/P2/MMN latency, and PLI-FC in the alpha band may reflect the process of auditory function remodeling and could be an objective index for the assessment of speech perception ability and the effect of cochlear implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7901906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79019062021-02-24 Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study Wang, Songjian Lin, Meng Sun, Liwei Chen, Xueqing Fu, Xinxing Yan, LiLi Li, Chunlin Zhang, Xu Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Patients with severe profound hearing loss could benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). However, the neural mechanism of such benefit is still unclear. Therefore, we analyzed the electroencephalogram (EEG) and behavioral indicators of auditory function remodeling in patients with CI. Both indicators were sampled at multiple time points after implantation (1, 90, and 180 days). METHODS: First, the speech perception ability was evaluated with the recording of a list of Chinese words and sentences in 15 healthy controls (HC group) and 10 patients with CI (CI group). EEG data were collected using an oddball paradigm. Then, the characteristics of event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negative (MMN) were compared between the CI group and the HC group. In addition, we analyzed the phase lag indices (PLI) in the CI group and the HC group and calculated the difference in functional connectivity between the two groups at different stages after implantation. RESULTS: The behavioral indicator, speech recognition ability, in CI patients improved as the implantation time increased. The MMN analysis showed that CI patients could recognize the difference between standard and deviation stimuli just like the HCs 90 days after cochlear implantation. Comparing the latencies of N1/P2/MMN between the CI group and the HC group, we found that the latency of N1/P2 in CI patients was longer, while the latency of MMN in CI users was shorter. In addition, PLI-based whole-brain functional connectivity (PLI-FC) showed that the difference between the CI group and the HC group mainly exists in electrode pairs between the bilateral auditory area and the frontal area. Furthermore, all those differences gradually decreased with the increase in implantation time. CONCLUSION: The N1 amplitude, N1/P2/MMN latency, and PLI-FC in the alpha band may reflect the process of auditory function remodeling and could be an objective index for the assessment of speech perception ability and the effect of cochlear implantation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7901906/ /pubmed/33633529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.624484 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Lin, Sun, Chen, Fu, Yan, Li and Zhang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Wang, Songjian
Lin, Meng
Sun, Liwei
Chen, Xueqing
Fu, Xinxing
Yan, LiLi
Li, Chunlin
Zhang, Xu
Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study
title Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study
title_full Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study
title_short Neural Mechanisms of Hearing Recovery for Cochlear-Implanted Patients: An Electroencephalogram Follow-Up Study
title_sort neural mechanisms of hearing recovery for cochlear-implanted patients: an electroencephalogram follow-up study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633529
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.624484
work_keys_str_mv AT wangsongjian neuralmechanismsofhearingrecoveryforcochlearimplantedpatientsanelectroencephalogramfollowupstudy
AT linmeng neuralmechanismsofhearingrecoveryforcochlearimplantedpatientsanelectroencephalogramfollowupstudy
AT sunliwei neuralmechanismsofhearingrecoveryforcochlearimplantedpatientsanelectroencephalogramfollowupstudy
AT chenxueqing neuralmechanismsofhearingrecoveryforcochlearimplantedpatientsanelectroencephalogramfollowupstudy
AT fuxinxing neuralmechanismsofhearingrecoveryforcochlearimplantedpatientsanelectroencephalogramfollowupstudy
AT yanlili neuralmechanismsofhearingrecoveryforcochlearimplantedpatientsanelectroencephalogramfollowupstudy
AT lichunlin neuralmechanismsofhearingrecoveryforcochlearimplantedpatientsanelectroencephalogramfollowupstudy
AT zhangxu neuralmechanismsofhearingrecoveryforcochlearimplantedpatientsanelectroencephalogramfollowupstudy