Cargando…
Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Dabigatran is a univalent low-molecular-weight direct thrombin inhibitor which was developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the safety of dabigatran remains controversial so far. In this study, we aimed to compare the risk of bleeding, fatal adverse events, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.626063 |
_version_ | 1783654471366082560 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Ya Yao, Zhihao Zhu, Linjie Tang, Yong Chen, Jie Wu, Jianming |
author_facet | Zhou, Ya Yao, Zhihao Zhu, Linjie Tang, Yong Chen, Jie Wu, Jianming |
author_sort | Zhou, Ya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Dabigatran is a univalent low-molecular-weight direct thrombin inhibitor which was developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the safety of dabigatran remains controversial so far. In this study, we aimed to compare the risk of bleeding, fatal adverse events, and the all-cause mortality of dabigatran with those of the control group by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Wanfang database, Clinical trial, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Chinese Scientific Journal database (VIP), and Chinese Biological Medicine database (CBM), for clinical trials on conventional treatments compared with dabigatran, published between January 2014 and July 2020. The reported outcomes, including the endpoints of primary safety, were systematically investigated. Results: Seven RCTs (n = 10,743) were included in the present systematic review. Compared to the control groups, dabigatran was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 1.21, p = 0.06), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.36, p = 0.41), fatal adverse reactions (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.17, p = 0.66), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.11, p = 0.45, I(2) = 0%), and significantly reduced risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42, p = 0.0007). However, dabigatran is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (RR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.13, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Dabigatran has a favorable safety profile in terms of major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and life-threatening events, among other safety outcomes. The present study suggested that dabigatran may be a suitable alternative to VKAs as an oral anticoagulant. However, more data are necessary to clarify the incidence of other adverse events and serious adverse reactions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7901998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79019982021-02-24 Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhou, Ya Yao, Zhihao Zhu, Linjie Tang, Yong Chen, Jie Wu, Jianming Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Dabigatran is a univalent low-molecular-weight direct thrombin inhibitor which was developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the safety of dabigatran remains controversial so far. In this study, we aimed to compare the risk of bleeding, fatal adverse events, and the all-cause mortality of dabigatran with those of the control group by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Wanfang database, Clinical trial, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Chinese Scientific Journal database (VIP), and Chinese Biological Medicine database (CBM), for clinical trials on conventional treatments compared with dabigatran, published between January 2014 and July 2020. The reported outcomes, including the endpoints of primary safety, were systematically investigated. Results: Seven RCTs (n = 10,743) were included in the present systematic review. Compared to the control groups, dabigatran was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 1.21, p = 0.06), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.36, p = 0.41), fatal adverse reactions (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.17, p = 0.66), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.11, p = 0.45, I(2) = 0%), and significantly reduced risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42, p = 0.0007). However, dabigatran is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (RR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.13, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Dabigatran has a favorable safety profile in terms of major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and life-threatening events, among other safety outcomes. The present study suggested that dabigatran may be a suitable alternative to VKAs as an oral anticoagulant. However, more data are necessary to clarify the incidence of other adverse events and serious adverse reactions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7901998/ /pubmed/33633574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.626063 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Yao, Zhu, Tang, Chen and Wu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Zhou, Ya Yao, Zhihao Zhu, Linjie Tang, Yong Chen, Jie Wu, Jianming Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | safety of dabigatran as an anticoagulant: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.626063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouya safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yaozhihao safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhulinjie safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tangyong safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjie safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wujianming safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |