Cargando…

Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Dabigatran is a univalent low-molecular-weight direct thrombin inhibitor which was developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the safety of dabigatran remains controversial so far. In this study, we aimed to compare the risk of bleeding, fatal adverse events, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ya, Yao, Zhihao, Zhu, Linjie, Tang, Yong, Chen, Jie, Wu, Jianming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.626063
_version_ 1783654471366082560
author Zhou, Ya
Yao, Zhihao
Zhu, Linjie
Tang, Yong
Chen, Jie
Wu, Jianming
author_facet Zhou, Ya
Yao, Zhihao
Zhu, Linjie
Tang, Yong
Chen, Jie
Wu, Jianming
author_sort Zhou, Ya
collection PubMed
description Background: Dabigatran is a univalent low-molecular-weight direct thrombin inhibitor which was developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the safety of dabigatran remains controversial so far. In this study, we aimed to compare the risk of bleeding, fatal adverse events, and the all-cause mortality of dabigatran with those of the control group by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Wanfang database, Clinical trial, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Chinese Scientific Journal database (VIP), and Chinese Biological Medicine database (CBM), for clinical trials on conventional treatments compared with dabigatran, published between January 2014 and July 2020. The reported outcomes, including the endpoints of primary safety, were systematically investigated. Results: Seven RCTs (n = 10,743) were included in the present systematic review. Compared to the control groups, dabigatran was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 1.21, p = 0.06), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.36, p = 0.41), fatal adverse reactions (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.17, p = 0.66), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.11, p = 0.45, I(2) = 0%), and significantly reduced risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42, p = 0.0007). However, dabigatran is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (RR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.13, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Dabigatran has a favorable safety profile in terms of major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and life-threatening events, among other safety outcomes. The present study suggested that dabigatran may be a suitable alternative to VKAs as an oral anticoagulant. However, more data are necessary to clarify the incidence of other adverse events and serious adverse reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7901998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79019982021-02-24 Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhou, Ya Yao, Zhihao Zhu, Linjie Tang, Yong Chen, Jie Wu, Jianming Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Dabigatran is a univalent low-molecular-weight direct thrombin inhibitor which was developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the safety of dabigatran remains controversial so far. In this study, we aimed to compare the risk of bleeding, fatal adverse events, and the all-cause mortality of dabigatran with those of the control group by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Wanfang database, Clinical trial, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Chinese Scientific Journal database (VIP), and Chinese Biological Medicine database (CBM), for clinical trials on conventional treatments compared with dabigatran, published between January 2014 and July 2020. The reported outcomes, including the endpoints of primary safety, were systematically investigated. Results: Seven RCTs (n = 10,743) were included in the present systematic review. Compared to the control groups, dabigatran was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 1.21, p = 0.06), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.36, p = 0.41), fatal adverse reactions (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.17, p = 0.66), all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.11, p = 0.45, I(2) = 0%), and significantly reduced risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42, p = 0.0007). However, dabigatran is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (RR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.13, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Dabigatran has a favorable safety profile in terms of major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and life-threatening events, among other safety outcomes. The present study suggested that dabigatran may be a suitable alternative to VKAs as an oral anticoagulant. However, more data are necessary to clarify the incidence of other adverse events and serious adverse reactions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7901998/ /pubmed/33633574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.626063 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Yao, Zhu, Tang, Chen and Wu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Zhou, Ya
Yao, Zhihao
Zhu, Linjie
Tang, Yong
Chen, Jie
Wu, Jianming
Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Safety of Dabigatran as an Anticoagulant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort safety of dabigatran as an anticoagulant: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.626063
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouya safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yaozhihao safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhulinjie safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tangyong safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjie safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wujianming safetyofdabigatranasananticoagulantasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis