Cargando…

Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak

Objective  The aim of this study was to evaluate dentoskeletal changes in the treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herbst Cantilever Bite Jumper (CBJ) appliance, associated with multibracket appliances after the growth peak, at pretreatment. Materials and Methods  A sample of 37 individuals w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont, Janson, Guilherme, Tompson, Bryan, Alvares, José Carlos de Castro, Valarelli, Fabrício Pinelli, Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32869221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715789
_version_ 1783654493373595648
author Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
Janson, Guilherme
Tompson, Bryan
Alvares, José Carlos de Castro
Valarelli, Fabrício Pinelli
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
author_facet Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
Janson, Guilherme
Tompson, Bryan
Alvares, José Carlos de Castro
Valarelli, Fabrício Pinelli
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
author_sort Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
collection PubMed
description Objective  The aim of this study was to evaluate dentoskeletal changes in the treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herbst Cantilever Bite Jumper (CBJ) appliance, associated with multibracket appliances after the growth peak, at pretreatment. Materials and Methods  A sample of 37 individuals was divided into two groups: the experimental group comprised 16 patients treated consecutively for a mean period of 2.52 years with the Herbst CBJ appliance associated with multibracket appliances. A total of 21 subjects (10 males and 11 females) with Class II malocclusion and mean age at T1 of 16.08 years were followed for a mean period of 2.12 years composed the control group. Comparisons between the two groups were performed using initial and final lateral cephalograms. Comparisons between experimental and control groups at pretreatment and of the treatment changes were performed by Mann–Whitney or independent t -tests. Results  Experimental group exhibited a significantly greater labial inclination of the mandibular incisors in comparison to the control group. Additionally, significantly greater corrections in overbite, overjet, and molar relationship were observed in the experimental than in the control groups. Conclusion  The effects of the Herbst CBJ appliance, associated with fixed appliances after the growth peak in Class II malocclusion treatment are correction in molar relationship toward a Class I relationship, decrease of the overjet, decrease of the overbite, and mandibular incisors labial inclination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7902098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79020982021-03-01 Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont Janson, Guilherme Tompson, Bryan Alvares, José Carlos de Castro Valarelli, Fabrício Pinelli Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore Eur J Dent Objective  The aim of this study was to evaluate dentoskeletal changes in the treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herbst Cantilever Bite Jumper (CBJ) appliance, associated with multibracket appliances after the growth peak, at pretreatment. Materials and Methods  A sample of 37 individuals was divided into two groups: the experimental group comprised 16 patients treated consecutively for a mean period of 2.52 years with the Herbst CBJ appliance associated with multibracket appliances. A total of 21 subjects (10 males and 11 females) with Class II malocclusion and mean age at T1 of 16.08 years were followed for a mean period of 2.12 years composed the control group. Comparisons between the two groups were performed using initial and final lateral cephalograms. Comparisons between experimental and control groups at pretreatment and of the treatment changes were performed by Mann–Whitney or independent t -tests. Results  Experimental group exhibited a significantly greater labial inclination of the mandibular incisors in comparison to the control group. Additionally, significantly greater corrections in overbite, overjet, and molar relationship were observed in the experimental than in the control groups. Conclusion  The effects of the Herbst CBJ appliance, associated with fixed appliances after the growth peak in Class II malocclusion treatment are correction in molar relationship toward a Class I relationship, decrease of the overjet, decrease of the overbite, and mandibular incisors labial inclination. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-02 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7902098/ /pubmed/32869221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715789 Text en European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
Janson, Guilherme
Tompson, Bryan
Alvares, José Carlos de Castro
Valarelli, Fabrício Pinelli
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak
title Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak
title_full Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak
title_fullStr Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak
title_short Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak
title_sort treatment effects of the herbst appliance in class ii malocclusion patients after the growth peak
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32869221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715789
work_keys_str_mv AT cancadorodrigohermont treatmenteffectsoftheherbstapplianceinclassiimalocclusionpatientsafterthegrowthpeak
AT jansonguilherme treatmenteffectsoftheherbstapplianceinclassiimalocclusionpatientsafterthegrowthpeak
AT tompsonbryan treatmenteffectsoftheherbstapplianceinclassiimalocclusionpatientsafterthegrowthpeak
AT alvaresjosecarlosdecastro treatmenteffectsoftheherbstapplianceinclassiimalocclusionpatientsafterthegrowthpeak
AT valarellifabriciopinelli treatmenteffectsoftheherbstapplianceinclassiimalocclusionpatientsafterthegrowthpeak
AT freitaskarinamariasalvatore treatmenteffectsoftheherbstapplianceinclassiimalocclusionpatientsafterthegrowthpeak