Cargando…

A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions

Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play crucial roles in DNA replication, recombination and repair, and serve as key players in the maintenance of genomic stability. While a number of SSBs bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) non-specifically, the others recognize and bind specific ssDNA sequen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Maoxuan, Malik, Fareeha K, Guo, Jun-tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab006
_version_ 1783654519461117952
author Lin, Maoxuan
Malik, Fareeha K
Guo, Jun-tao
author_facet Lin, Maoxuan
Malik, Fareeha K
Guo, Jun-tao
author_sort Lin, Maoxuan
collection PubMed
description Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play crucial roles in DNA replication, recombination and repair, and serve as key players in the maintenance of genomic stability. While a number of SSBs bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) non-specifically, the others recognize and bind specific ssDNA sequences. The mechanisms underlying this binding discrepancy, however, are largely unknown. Here, we present a comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions by annotating specific and non-specific SSBs and comparing structural features such as DNA-binding propensities and secondary structure types of residues in SSB–ssDNA interactions, protein–ssDNA hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions between specific and non-specific SSBs. Our results suggest that protein side chain-DNA base hydrogen bonds are the major contributors to protein–ssDNA binding specificity, while π–π interactions may mainly contribute to binding affinity. We also found the enrichment of aspartate in the specific SSBs, a key feature in specific protein–double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) interactions as reported in our previous study. In addition, no significant differences between specific and non-specific groups with respect of conformational changes upon ssDNA binding were found, suggesting that the flexibility of SSBs plays a lesser role than that of dsDNA-binding proteins in conferring binding specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7902235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79022352021-03-01 A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions Lin, Maoxuan Malik, Fareeha K Guo, Jun-tao NAR Genom Bioinform Standard Article Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play crucial roles in DNA replication, recombination and repair, and serve as key players in the maintenance of genomic stability. While a number of SSBs bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) non-specifically, the others recognize and bind specific ssDNA sequences. The mechanisms underlying this binding discrepancy, however, are largely unknown. Here, we present a comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions by annotating specific and non-specific SSBs and comparing structural features such as DNA-binding propensities and secondary structure types of residues in SSB–ssDNA interactions, protein–ssDNA hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions between specific and non-specific SSBs. Our results suggest that protein side chain-DNA base hydrogen bonds are the major contributors to protein–ssDNA binding specificity, while π–π interactions may mainly contribute to binding affinity. We also found the enrichment of aspartate in the specific SSBs, a key feature in specific protein–double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) interactions as reported in our previous study. In addition, no significant differences between specific and non-specific groups with respect of conformational changes upon ssDNA binding were found, suggesting that the flexibility of SSBs plays a lesser role than that of dsDNA-binding proteins in conferring binding specificity. Oxford University Press 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7902235/ /pubmed/33655206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab006 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Standard Article
Lin, Maoxuan
Malik, Fareeha K
Guo, Jun-tao
A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions
title A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions
title_full A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions
title_fullStr A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions
title_short A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions
title_sort comparative study of protein–ssdna interactions
topic Standard Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab006
work_keys_str_mv AT linmaoxuan acomparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions
AT malikfareehak acomparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions
AT guojuntao acomparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions
AT linmaoxuan comparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions
AT malikfareehak comparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions
AT guojuntao comparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions