Cargando…
A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play crucial roles in DNA replication, recombination and repair, and serve as key players in the maintenance of genomic stability. While a number of SSBs bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) non-specifically, the others recognize and bind specific ssDNA sequen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab006 |
_version_ | 1783654519461117952 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Maoxuan Malik, Fareeha K Guo, Jun-tao |
author_facet | Lin, Maoxuan Malik, Fareeha K Guo, Jun-tao |
author_sort | Lin, Maoxuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play crucial roles in DNA replication, recombination and repair, and serve as key players in the maintenance of genomic stability. While a number of SSBs bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) non-specifically, the others recognize and bind specific ssDNA sequences. The mechanisms underlying this binding discrepancy, however, are largely unknown. Here, we present a comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions by annotating specific and non-specific SSBs and comparing structural features such as DNA-binding propensities and secondary structure types of residues in SSB–ssDNA interactions, protein–ssDNA hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions between specific and non-specific SSBs. Our results suggest that protein side chain-DNA base hydrogen bonds are the major contributors to protein–ssDNA binding specificity, while π–π interactions may mainly contribute to binding affinity. We also found the enrichment of aspartate in the specific SSBs, a key feature in specific protein–double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) interactions as reported in our previous study. In addition, no significant differences between specific and non-specific groups with respect of conformational changes upon ssDNA binding were found, suggesting that the flexibility of SSBs plays a lesser role than that of dsDNA-binding proteins in conferring binding specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7902235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79022352021-03-01 A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions Lin, Maoxuan Malik, Fareeha K Guo, Jun-tao NAR Genom Bioinform Standard Article Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play crucial roles in DNA replication, recombination and repair, and serve as key players in the maintenance of genomic stability. While a number of SSBs bind single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) non-specifically, the others recognize and bind specific ssDNA sequences. The mechanisms underlying this binding discrepancy, however, are largely unknown. Here, we present a comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions by annotating specific and non-specific SSBs and comparing structural features such as DNA-binding propensities and secondary structure types of residues in SSB–ssDNA interactions, protein–ssDNA hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions between specific and non-specific SSBs. Our results suggest that protein side chain-DNA base hydrogen bonds are the major contributors to protein–ssDNA binding specificity, while π–π interactions may mainly contribute to binding affinity. We also found the enrichment of aspartate in the specific SSBs, a key feature in specific protein–double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) interactions as reported in our previous study. In addition, no significant differences between specific and non-specific groups with respect of conformational changes upon ssDNA binding were found, suggesting that the flexibility of SSBs plays a lesser role than that of dsDNA-binding proteins in conferring binding specificity. Oxford University Press 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7902235/ /pubmed/33655206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab006 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Standard Article Lin, Maoxuan Malik, Fareeha K Guo, Jun-tao A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions |
title | A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions |
title_full | A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions |
title_short | A comparative study of protein–ssDNA interactions |
title_sort | comparative study of protein–ssdna interactions |
topic | Standard Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33655206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linmaoxuan acomparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions AT malikfareehak acomparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions AT guojuntao acomparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions AT linmaoxuan comparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions AT malikfareehak comparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions AT guojuntao comparativestudyofproteinssdnainteractions |