Cargando…

The Mitogenomes of Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum and Comparisons With Other Members of the Ophiostomatales

Fungi assigned to the Ophiostomatales are of economic concern as many are blue-stain fungi and some are plant pathogens. The mitogenomes of two blue-stain fungi, Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum, were sequenced and compared with currently available mitogenomes for other members of the Ophio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zubaer, Abdullah, Wai, Alvan, Patel, Nikita, Perillo, Jordan, Hausner, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33643245
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.618649
_version_ 1783654545226727424
author Zubaer, Abdullah
Wai, Alvan
Patel, Nikita
Perillo, Jordan
Hausner, Georg
author_facet Zubaer, Abdullah
Wai, Alvan
Patel, Nikita
Perillo, Jordan
Hausner, Georg
author_sort Zubaer, Abdullah
collection PubMed
description Fungi assigned to the Ophiostomatales are of economic concern as many are blue-stain fungi and some are plant pathogens. The mitogenomes of two blue-stain fungi, Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum, were sequenced and compared with currently available mitogenomes for other members of the Ophiostomatales. Species representing various genera within the Ophiostomatales have been examined for gene content, gene order, phylogenetic relationships, and the distribution of mobile elements. Gene synteny is conserved among the Ophiostomatales but some members were missing the atp9 gene. A genome wide intron landscape has been prepared to demonstrate the distribution of the mobile genetic elements (group I and II introns and homing endonucleases) and to provide insight into the evolutionary dynamics of introns among members of this group of fungi. Examples of complex introns or nested introns composed of two or three intron modules have been observed in some species. The size variation among the mitogenomes (from 23.7 kb to about 150 kb) is mostly due to the presence and absence of introns. Members of the genus Sporothrix sensu stricto appear to have the smallest mitogenomes due to loss of introns. The taxonomy of the Ophiostomatales has recently undergone considerable revisions; however, some lineages remain unresolved. The data showed that genera such as Raffaelea appear to be polyphyletic and the separation of Sporothrix sensu stricto from Ophiostoma is justified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7902536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79025362021-02-25 The Mitogenomes of Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum and Comparisons With Other Members of the Ophiostomatales Zubaer, Abdullah Wai, Alvan Patel, Nikita Perillo, Jordan Hausner, Georg Front Microbiol Microbiology Fungi assigned to the Ophiostomatales are of economic concern as many are blue-stain fungi and some are plant pathogens. The mitogenomes of two blue-stain fungi, Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum, were sequenced and compared with currently available mitogenomes for other members of the Ophiostomatales. Species representing various genera within the Ophiostomatales have been examined for gene content, gene order, phylogenetic relationships, and the distribution of mobile elements. Gene synteny is conserved among the Ophiostomatales but some members were missing the atp9 gene. A genome wide intron landscape has been prepared to demonstrate the distribution of the mobile genetic elements (group I and II introns and homing endonucleases) and to provide insight into the evolutionary dynamics of introns among members of this group of fungi. Examples of complex introns or nested introns composed of two or three intron modules have been observed in some species. The size variation among the mitogenomes (from 23.7 kb to about 150 kb) is mostly due to the presence and absence of introns. Members of the genus Sporothrix sensu stricto appear to have the smallest mitogenomes due to loss of introns. The taxonomy of the Ophiostomatales has recently undergone considerable revisions; however, some lineages remain unresolved. The data showed that genera such as Raffaelea appear to be polyphyletic and the separation of Sporothrix sensu stricto from Ophiostoma is justified. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7902536/ /pubmed/33643245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.618649 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zubaer, Wai, Patel, Perillo and Hausner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Zubaer, Abdullah
Wai, Alvan
Patel, Nikita
Perillo, Jordan
Hausner, Georg
The Mitogenomes of Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum and Comparisons With Other Members of the Ophiostomatales
title The Mitogenomes of Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum and Comparisons With Other Members of the Ophiostomatales
title_full The Mitogenomes of Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum and Comparisons With Other Members of the Ophiostomatales
title_fullStr The Mitogenomes of Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum and Comparisons With Other Members of the Ophiostomatales
title_full_unstemmed The Mitogenomes of Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum and Comparisons With Other Members of the Ophiostomatales
title_short The Mitogenomes of Ophiostoma minus and Ophiostoma piliferum and Comparisons With Other Members of the Ophiostomatales
title_sort mitogenomes of ophiostoma minus and ophiostoma piliferum and comparisons with other members of the ophiostomatales
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33643245
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.618649
work_keys_str_mv AT zubaerabdullah themitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT waialvan themitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT patelnikita themitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT perillojordan themitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT hausnergeorg themitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT zubaerabdullah mitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT waialvan mitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT patelnikita mitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT perillojordan mitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales
AT hausnergeorg mitogenomesofophiostomaminusandophiostomapiliferumandcomparisonswithothermembersoftheophiostomatales