Cargando…

When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory

Working memory (WM) enables temporary storage and manipulation of information,(1) supporting tasks that require bridging between perception and subsequent behavior. Its properties, such as its capacity, have been thoroughly investigated in highly controlled laboratory tasks.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Draschkow, Dejan, Kallmayer, Melvin, Nobre, Anna C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cell Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33278355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.013
_version_ 1783654627502194688
author Draschkow, Dejan
Kallmayer, Melvin
Nobre, Anna C.
author_facet Draschkow, Dejan
Kallmayer, Melvin
Nobre, Anna C.
author_sort Draschkow, Dejan
collection PubMed
description Working memory (WM) enables temporary storage and manipulation of information,(1) supporting tasks that require bridging between perception and subsequent behavior. Its properties, such as its capacity, have been thoroughly investigated in highly controlled laboratory tasks.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Much less is known about the utilization and properties of WM in natural behavior,9, 10, 11 when reliance on WM emerges as a natural consequence of interactions with the environment. We measured the trade-off between reliance on WM and gathering information externally during immersive behavior in an adapted object-copying task.(12) By manipulating the locomotive demands required for task completion, we could investigate whether and how WM utilization changed as gathering information from the environment became more effortful. Reliance on WM was lower than WM capacity measures in typical laboratory tasks. A clear trade-off also occurred. As sampling information from the environment required increasing locomotion and time investment, participants relied more on their WM representations. This reliance on WM increased in a shallow and linear fashion and was associated with longer encoding durations. Participants’ avoidance of WM usage showcases a fundamental dependence on external information during ecological behavior, even if the potentially storable information is well within the capacity of the cognitive system. These foundational findings highlight the importance of using immersive tasks to understand how cognitive processes unfold within natural behavior. Our novel VR approach effectively combines the ecological validity, experimental rigor, and sensitive measures required to investigate the interplay between memory and perception in immersive behavior. VIDEO ABSTRACT:
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7902904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cell Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79029042021-03-03 When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory Draschkow, Dejan Kallmayer, Melvin Nobre, Anna C. Curr Biol Report Working memory (WM) enables temporary storage and manipulation of information,(1) supporting tasks that require bridging between perception and subsequent behavior. Its properties, such as its capacity, have been thoroughly investigated in highly controlled laboratory tasks.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Much less is known about the utilization and properties of WM in natural behavior,9, 10, 11 when reliance on WM emerges as a natural consequence of interactions with the environment. We measured the trade-off between reliance on WM and gathering information externally during immersive behavior in an adapted object-copying task.(12) By manipulating the locomotive demands required for task completion, we could investigate whether and how WM utilization changed as gathering information from the environment became more effortful. Reliance on WM was lower than WM capacity measures in typical laboratory tasks. A clear trade-off also occurred. As sampling information from the environment required increasing locomotion and time investment, participants relied more on their WM representations. This reliance on WM increased in a shallow and linear fashion and was associated with longer encoding durations. Participants’ avoidance of WM usage showcases a fundamental dependence on external information during ecological behavior, even if the potentially storable information is well within the capacity of the cognitive system. These foundational findings highlight the importance of using immersive tasks to understand how cognitive processes unfold within natural behavior. Our novel VR approach effectively combines the ecological validity, experimental rigor, and sensitive measures required to investigate the interplay between memory and perception in immersive behavior. VIDEO ABSTRACT: Cell Press 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7902904/ /pubmed/33278355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.013 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Report
Draschkow, Dejan
Kallmayer, Melvin
Nobre, Anna C.
When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory
title When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory
title_full When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory
title_fullStr When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory
title_full_unstemmed When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory
title_short When Natural Behavior Engages Working Memory
title_sort when natural behavior engages working memory
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33278355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.013
work_keys_str_mv AT draschkowdejan whennaturalbehaviorengagesworkingmemory
AT kallmayermelvin whennaturalbehaviorengagesworkingmemory
AT nobreannac whennaturalbehaviorengagesworkingmemory