Cargando…

Differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection

In 2003, Höckel described the laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER), which may be an effective surgical technique for patients with laterally recurrent cervical cancer (Höckel, 2003). Super-radical hysterectomy, which was introduced by Ryukichi Mibayashi in 1941, is the traditional surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanao, Hiroyuki, Kurita, Tomoko, Tanaka, Yuji, Fusegi, Atsushi, Aoki, Yoichi, Nomura, Hidetaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100728
_version_ 1783654636447596544
author Kanao, Hiroyuki
Kurita, Tomoko
Tanaka, Yuji
Fusegi, Atsushi
Aoki, Yoichi
Nomura, Hidetaka
author_facet Kanao, Hiroyuki
Kurita, Tomoko
Tanaka, Yuji
Fusegi, Atsushi
Aoki, Yoichi
Nomura, Hidetaka
author_sort Kanao, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description In 2003, Höckel described the laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER), which may be an effective surgical technique for patients with laterally recurrent cervical cancer (Höckel, 2003). Super-radical hysterectomy, which was introduced by Ryukichi Mibayashi in 1941, is the traditional surgical approach for cervical cancer patients (Kim et al., 2017). These two procedures are similar and belong to the same group (type D) in the Querleu-Morrow classification (Querleu et al., 2017). Until now, no surgical video clearly demonstrated their differences, because technical complexities and concern for procedural safety are still being debated. The present video demonstrated total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for laterally recurrent, previously irradiated cervical cancer that involved both the bladder and rectum. In this case, the recurrent tumor infiltrated the parametrium, reached the left pelvic sidewall, and invaded the left piriform muscle, sacrospinous ligament, and spine segment S2. To completely clear the tumor, we used TPE with super-radical hysterectomy on the right side and LEER on the left. We performed this procedure laparoscopically because improved visualization allows for meticulous dissection and a higher possibility of achieving R0. Surgery time was 9 h 45 min including the time for creation of the ileal conduit and colostomy, and blood loss was 230 ml with no blood transfusion needed. Pathological R0 resection was achieved without any intraoperative and postoperative complications. Compared to super-radical hysterectomy, LEER ensured additional surgical margins. Without any adjuvant treatment, there has been no sign of recurrence during the 12 months that have passed since the surgery. Laparoscopic TPE with super-radical hysterectomy and LEER for laterally recurrent, previously irradiated cervical cancer is a technically feasible and safe surgical option. LEER can ensure more surgical margins than super-radical hysterectomy, and it may be a treatment of choice for more advanced lateral recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7902941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79029412021-03-03 Differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection Kanao, Hiroyuki Kurita, Tomoko Tanaka, Yuji Fusegi, Atsushi Aoki, Yoichi Nomura, Hidetaka Gynecol Oncol Rep Surgical Film In 2003, Höckel described the laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER), which may be an effective surgical technique for patients with laterally recurrent cervical cancer (Höckel, 2003). Super-radical hysterectomy, which was introduced by Ryukichi Mibayashi in 1941, is the traditional surgical approach for cervical cancer patients (Kim et al., 2017). These two procedures are similar and belong to the same group (type D) in the Querleu-Morrow classification (Querleu et al., 2017). Until now, no surgical video clearly demonstrated their differences, because technical complexities and concern for procedural safety are still being debated. The present video demonstrated total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for laterally recurrent, previously irradiated cervical cancer that involved both the bladder and rectum. In this case, the recurrent tumor infiltrated the parametrium, reached the left pelvic sidewall, and invaded the left piriform muscle, sacrospinous ligament, and spine segment S2. To completely clear the tumor, we used TPE with super-radical hysterectomy on the right side and LEER on the left. We performed this procedure laparoscopically because improved visualization allows for meticulous dissection and a higher possibility of achieving R0. Surgery time was 9 h 45 min including the time for creation of the ileal conduit and colostomy, and blood loss was 230 ml with no blood transfusion needed. Pathological R0 resection was achieved without any intraoperative and postoperative complications. Compared to super-radical hysterectomy, LEER ensured additional surgical margins. Without any adjuvant treatment, there has been no sign of recurrence during the 12 months that have passed since the surgery. Laparoscopic TPE with super-radical hysterectomy and LEER for laterally recurrent, previously irradiated cervical cancer is a technically feasible and safe surgical option. LEER can ensure more surgical margins than super-radical hysterectomy, and it may be a treatment of choice for more advanced lateral recurrence. Elsevier 2021-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7902941/ /pubmed/33665294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100728 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Surgical Film
Kanao, Hiroyuki
Kurita, Tomoko
Tanaka, Yuji
Fusegi, Atsushi
Aoki, Yoichi
Nomura, Hidetaka
Differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection
title Differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection
title_full Differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection
title_fullStr Differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection
title_full_unstemmed Differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection
title_short Differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection
title_sort differences between laparoscopic super-radical hysterectomy and laterally extended endopelvic resection
topic Surgical Film
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100728
work_keys_str_mv AT kanaohiroyuki differencesbetweenlaparoscopicsuperradicalhysterectomyandlaterallyextendedendopelvicresection
AT kuritatomoko differencesbetweenlaparoscopicsuperradicalhysterectomyandlaterallyextendedendopelvicresection
AT tanakayuji differencesbetweenlaparoscopicsuperradicalhysterectomyandlaterallyextendedendopelvicresection
AT fusegiatsushi differencesbetweenlaparoscopicsuperradicalhysterectomyandlaterallyextendedendopelvicresection
AT aokiyoichi differencesbetweenlaparoscopicsuperradicalhysterectomyandlaterallyextendedendopelvicresection
AT nomurahidetaka differencesbetweenlaparoscopicsuperradicalhysterectomyandlaterallyextendedendopelvicresection