Cargando…

Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting

BACKGROUND: Using non-pharmacological interventions is a current approach in dementia care to manage responsive behaviors, to maintain functional capacity, and to reduce emotional stress. Novel technologies such as social robot interventions might be useful to engage people with dementia in activiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirt, Julian, Ballhausen, Nicola, Hering, Alexandra, Kliegel, Matthias, Beer, Thomas, Meyer, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200347
_version_ 1783654638374879232
author Hirt, Julian
Ballhausen, Nicola
Hering, Alexandra
Kliegel, Matthias
Beer, Thomas
Meyer, Gabriele
author_facet Hirt, Julian
Ballhausen, Nicola
Hering, Alexandra
Kliegel, Matthias
Beer, Thomas
Meyer, Gabriele
author_sort Hirt, Julian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Using non-pharmacological interventions is a current approach in dementia care to manage responsive behaviors, to maintain functional capacity, and to reduce emotional stress. Novel technologies such as social robot interventions might be useful to engage people with dementia in activities and interactions as well as to improve their cognitive, emotional, and physical status. OBJECTIVE: Assessing the effects and the quality of reporting of social robot interventions for people with dementia. METHODS: In our systematic review, we included quasi-experimental and experimental studies published in English, French, or German, irrespective of publication year. Searching CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection was supplemented by citation tracking and free web searching. To assess the methodological quality of included studies, we used tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To assess the reporting of the interventions, we applied CReDECI 2 and TIDieR. RESULTS: We identified sixteen studies published between 2012 and 2018, including two to 415 participants with mostly non-defined type of dementia. Eight studies had an experimental design. The predominant robot types were pet robots (i.e., PARO). Most studies addressed behavioral, emotion-related, and functional outcomes with beneficial, non-beneficial, and mixed results. Predominantly, cognitive outcomes were not improved. Overall, studies were of moderate methodological quality. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneous populations, intervention characteristics, and measured outcomes make it difficult to generalize the results with regard to clinical practice. The impact of social robot interventions on behavioral, emotion-related, and functional outcomes should therefore be assessed considering the severity of dementia and intervention characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7902949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79029492021-03-09 Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting Hirt, Julian Ballhausen, Nicola Hering, Alexandra Kliegel, Matthias Beer, Thomas Meyer, Gabriele J Alzheimers Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Using non-pharmacological interventions is a current approach in dementia care to manage responsive behaviors, to maintain functional capacity, and to reduce emotional stress. Novel technologies such as social robot interventions might be useful to engage people with dementia in activities and interactions as well as to improve their cognitive, emotional, and physical status. OBJECTIVE: Assessing the effects and the quality of reporting of social robot interventions for people with dementia. METHODS: In our systematic review, we included quasi-experimental and experimental studies published in English, French, or German, irrespective of publication year. Searching CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection was supplemented by citation tracking and free web searching. To assess the methodological quality of included studies, we used tools provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To assess the reporting of the interventions, we applied CReDECI 2 and TIDieR. RESULTS: We identified sixteen studies published between 2012 and 2018, including two to 415 participants with mostly non-defined type of dementia. Eight studies had an experimental design. The predominant robot types were pet robots (i.e., PARO). Most studies addressed behavioral, emotion-related, and functional outcomes with beneficial, non-beneficial, and mixed results. Predominantly, cognitive outcomes were not improved. Overall, studies were of moderate methodological quality. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneous populations, intervention characteristics, and measured outcomes make it difficult to generalize the results with regard to clinical practice. The impact of social robot interventions on behavioral, emotion-related, and functional outcomes should therefore be assessed considering the severity of dementia and intervention characteristics. IOS Press 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7902949/ /pubmed/33361589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200347 Text en © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hirt, Julian
Ballhausen, Nicola
Hering, Alexandra
Kliegel, Matthias
Beer, Thomas
Meyer, Gabriele
Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting
title Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting
title_full Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting
title_fullStr Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting
title_full_unstemmed Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting
title_short Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting
title_sort social robot interventions for people with dementia: a systematic review on effects and quality of reporting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200347
work_keys_str_mv AT hirtjulian socialrobotinterventionsforpeoplewithdementiaasystematicreviewoneffectsandqualityofreporting
AT ballhausennicola socialrobotinterventionsforpeoplewithdementiaasystematicreviewoneffectsandqualityofreporting
AT heringalexandra socialrobotinterventionsforpeoplewithdementiaasystematicreviewoneffectsandqualityofreporting
AT kliegelmatthias socialrobotinterventionsforpeoplewithdementiaasystematicreviewoneffectsandqualityofreporting
AT beerthomas socialrobotinterventionsforpeoplewithdementiaasystematicreviewoneffectsandqualityofreporting
AT meyergabriele socialrobotinterventionsforpeoplewithdementiaasystematicreviewoneffectsandqualityofreporting