Cargando…
PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design
BACKGROUND: Selecting the most suitable questionnaire(s) in comfort research for product design is always a challenge, even for experienced researchers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research is to create a list of Preferred Comfort Questionnaires (PCQ) for product design to help researchers in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33337404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-208002 |
_version_ | 1783654642905776128 |
---|---|
author | Anjani, Shabila Kühne, Manon Naddeo, Alessandro Frohriep, Susanne Mansfield, Neil Song, Yu Vink, Peter |
author_facet | Anjani, Shabila Kühne, Manon Naddeo, Alessandro Frohriep, Susanne Mansfield, Neil Song, Yu Vink, Peter |
author_sort | Anjani, Shabila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Selecting the most suitable questionnaire(s) in comfort research for product design is always a challenge, even for experienced researchers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research is to create a list of Preferred Comfort Questionnaires (PCQ) for product design to help researchers in the selection of questionnaires for comfort research. METHODS: Fifteen questionnaires that are often used in comfort research for product design were selected as candidate questionnaires. During the Second International Comfort Congress (ICC 2019), 55 researchers and practitioners working in the field of comfort joined together in a workshop to rate these questionnaires individually as well as rank them in groups based on their experience. The criteria of rating and ranking included easiness to answer, easiness for data interpretation, time needed to complete, the need for prior training, as well as mapping the applicable design phases and field of application. RESULTS: The elicited responses related to each questionnaire were analyzed. For comfort research in five proposed application fields and four design phases, the preferred questionnaires were highlighted and categorized into four categories: preferred questionnaire, suitable for less prior training, suitable for fast completion and generally applicable, which led to a list of PCQ for product design. CONCLUSION: We expect that the PCQ list can be used as a useful instrument to help researchers in selecting questionnaires for comfort research in product design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7902968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79029682021-03-09 PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design Anjani, Shabila Kühne, Manon Naddeo, Alessandro Frohriep, Susanne Mansfield, Neil Song, Yu Vink, Peter Work Research Article BACKGROUND: Selecting the most suitable questionnaire(s) in comfort research for product design is always a challenge, even for experienced researchers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research is to create a list of Preferred Comfort Questionnaires (PCQ) for product design to help researchers in the selection of questionnaires for comfort research. METHODS: Fifteen questionnaires that are often used in comfort research for product design were selected as candidate questionnaires. During the Second International Comfort Congress (ICC 2019), 55 researchers and practitioners working in the field of comfort joined together in a workshop to rate these questionnaires individually as well as rank them in groups based on their experience. The criteria of rating and ranking included easiness to answer, easiness for data interpretation, time needed to complete, the need for prior training, as well as mapping the applicable design phases and field of application. RESULTS: The elicited responses related to each questionnaire were analyzed. For comfort research in five proposed application fields and four design phases, the preferred questionnaires were highlighted and categorized into four categories: preferred questionnaire, suitable for less prior training, suitable for fast completion and generally applicable, which led to a list of PCQ for product design. CONCLUSION: We expect that the PCQ list can be used as a useful instrument to help researchers in selecting questionnaires for comfort research in product design. IOS Press 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7902968/ /pubmed/33337404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-208002 Text en © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Anjani, Shabila Kühne, Manon Naddeo, Alessandro Frohriep, Susanne Mansfield, Neil Song, Yu Vink, Peter PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design |
title | PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design |
title_full | PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design |
title_fullStr | PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design |
title_full_unstemmed | PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design |
title_short | PCQ: Preferred Comfort Questionnaires for product design |
title_sort | pcq: preferred comfort questionnaires for product design |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33337404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-208002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anjanishabila pcqpreferredcomfortquestionnairesforproductdesign AT kuhnemanon pcqpreferredcomfortquestionnairesforproductdesign AT naddeoalessandro pcqpreferredcomfortquestionnairesforproductdesign AT frohriepsusanne pcqpreferredcomfortquestionnairesforproductdesign AT mansfieldneil pcqpreferredcomfortquestionnairesforproductdesign AT songyu pcqpreferredcomfortquestionnairesforproductdesign AT vinkpeter pcqpreferredcomfortquestionnairesforproductdesign |