Cargando…
Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review
BACKGROUND: Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors with a favorable prognosis, but giant hepatic hemangiomas can cause abdominal symptoms and are indicated for treatment. Most cases are treated with surgery, but radiotherapy has also been used. However, to date, there have been no reports of proton b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.014 |
_version_ | 1783654649601982464 |
---|---|
author | Shimizu, Shosei Mizumoto, Masashi Okumura, Toshiyuki Li, Yinuo Baba, Keiichirou Murakami, Motohiro Ishida, Toshiki Nakamura, Masatoshi Hiroshima, Yuichi Iizumi, Takashi Saito, Takashi Numajiri, Haruko Nakai, Kei Hata, Masaharu Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_facet | Shimizu, Shosei Mizumoto, Masashi Okumura, Toshiyuki Li, Yinuo Baba, Keiichirou Murakami, Motohiro Ishida, Toshiki Nakamura, Masatoshi Hiroshima, Yuichi Iizumi, Takashi Saito, Takashi Numajiri, Haruko Nakai, Kei Hata, Masaharu Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_sort | Shimizu, Shosei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors with a favorable prognosis, but giant hepatic hemangiomas can cause abdominal symptoms and are indicated for treatment. Most cases are treated with surgery, but radiotherapy has also been used. However, to date, there have been no reports of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old woman had a tumor of 80 × 80 mm in the left medial lobe of the liver, which was diagnosed as a giant hemangioma based on the contrast pattern. Therapy was required for a giant hepatic hemangioma with symptoms, but the patient refused blood transfusion due to religious reasons, which made surgical resection difficult. Therefore, she was referred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. At her first visit, liver function was Child-Pugh A (5 points) and there was no elevation of tumor markers. Proton beam therapy of 28.6 Gy (RBE) given in 13 fractions was performed without interruption. The only observed acute radiation toxicity was Grade 1 dermatitis. One year after proton beam therapy, the hemangioma had significantly decreased, and a complete response has been maintained for 15 years based on ultrasound and MRI. CONCLUSION: This case is the first reported use of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. The outcome suggests that this treatment may be effective for a giant liver hemangioma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7902997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79029972021-03-03 Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review Shimizu, Shosei Mizumoto, Masashi Okumura, Toshiyuki Li, Yinuo Baba, Keiichirou Murakami, Motohiro Ishida, Toshiki Nakamura, Masatoshi Hiroshima, Yuichi Iizumi, Takashi Saito, Takashi Numajiri, Haruko Nakai, Kei Hata, Masaharu Sakurai, Hideyuki Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Case Report BACKGROUND: Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors with a favorable prognosis, but giant hepatic hemangiomas can cause abdominal symptoms and are indicated for treatment. Most cases are treated with surgery, but radiotherapy has also been used. However, to date, there have been no reports of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old woman had a tumor of 80 × 80 mm in the left medial lobe of the liver, which was diagnosed as a giant hemangioma based on the contrast pattern. Therapy was required for a giant hepatic hemangioma with symptoms, but the patient refused blood transfusion due to religious reasons, which made surgical resection difficult. Therefore, she was referred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. At her first visit, liver function was Child-Pugh A (5 points) and there was no elevation of tumor markers. Proton beam therapy of 28.6 Gy (RBE) given in 13 fractions was performed without interruption. The only observed acute radiation toxicity was Grade 1 dermatitis. One year after proton beam therapy, the hemangioma had significantly decreased, and a complete response has been maintained for 15 years based on ultrasound and MRI. CONCLUSION: This case is the first reported use of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. The outcome suggests that this treatment may be effective for a giant liver hemangioma. Elsevier 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7902997/ /pubmed/33665385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.014 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Shimizu, Shosei Mizumoto, Masashi Okumura, Toshiyuki Li, Yinuo Baba, Keiichirou Murakami, Motohiro Ishida, Toshiki Nakamura, Masatoshi Hiroshima, Yuichi Iizumi, Takashi Saito, Takashi Numajiri, Haruko Nakai, Kei Hata, Masaharu Sakurai, Hideyuki Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review |
title | Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review |
title_full | Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review |
title_fullStr | Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review |
title_short | Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review |
title_sort | proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: a case report and literature review |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7902997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimizushosei protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT mizumotomasashi protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT okumuratoshiyuki protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT liyinuo protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT babakeiichirou protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT murakamimotohiro protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT ishidatoshiki protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT nakamuramasatoshi protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT hiroshimayuichi protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT iizumitakashi protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT saitotakashi protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT numajiriharuko protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT nakaikei protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT hatamasaharu protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview AT sakuraihideyuki protonbeamtherapyforagianthepatichemangiomaacasereportandliteraturereview |