Cargando…

Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Brain oscillations, e.g. measured by electro- or magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG), are causally linked to brain functions that are fundamental for perception, cognition and learning. Recent advances in neurotechnology provide means to non-invasively target these oscillations using frequency-tuned am...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haslacher, David, Nasr, Khaled, Robinson, Stephen E., Braun, Christoph, Soekadar, Surjo R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33412281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117571
_version_ 1783654680972230656
author Haslacher, David
Nasr, Khaled
Robinson, Stephen E.
Braun, Christoph
Soekadar, Surjo R.
author_facet Haslacher, David
Nasr, Khaled
Robinson, Stephen E.
Braun, Christoph
Soekadar, Surjo R.
author_sort Haslacher, David
collection PubMed
description Brain oscillations, e.g. measured by electro- or magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG), are causally linked to brain functions that are fundamental for perception, cognition and learning. Recent advances in neurotechnology provide means to non-invasively target these oscillations using frequency-tuned amplitude-modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-tACS). However, online adaptation of stimulation parameters to ongoing brain oscillations remains an unsolved problem due to stimulation artifacts that impede such adaptation, particularly at the target frequency. Here, we introduce a real-time compatible artifact rejection algorithm (Stimulation Artifact Source Separation, SASS) that overcomes this limitation. SASS is a spatial filter (linear projection) removing EEG signal components that are maximally different in the presence versus absence of stimulation. This enables the reliable removal of stimulation-specific signal components, while leaving physiological signal components unaffected. For validation of SASS, we evoked brain activity with known phase and amplitude using 10 Hz visual flickers across 7 healthy human volunteers. 64-channel EEG was recorded during and in absence of 10 Hz AM-tACS targeting the visual cortex. Phase differences between AM-tACS and the visual stimuli were randomized, so that steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were phase-locked to the visual stimuli but not to the AM-tACS signal. For validation, distributions of single-trial amplitude and phase of EEG signals recorded during and in absence of AM-tACS were compared for each participant. When no artifact rejection method was applied, AM-tACS stimulation artifacts impeded assessment of single-trial SSVEP amplitude and phase. Using SASS, amplitude and phase of single trials recorded during and in absence of AM-tACS were comparable. These results indicate that SASS can be used to establish adaptive (closed-loop) AM-tACS, a potentially powerful tool to target various brain functions, and to investigate how AM-tACS interacts with electric brain oscillations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7903161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79031612021-03-03 Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) Haslacher, David Nasr, Khaled Robinson, Stephen E. Braun, Christoph Soekadar, Surjo R. Neuroimage Article Brain oscillations, e.g. measured by electro- or magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG), are causally linked to brain functions that are fundamental for perception, cognition and learning. Recent advances in neurotechnology provide means to non-invasively target these oscillations using frequency-tuned amplitude-modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-tACS). However, online adaptation of stimulation parameters to ongoing brain oscillations remains an unsolved problem due to stimulation artifacts that impede such adaptation, particularly at the target frequency. Here, we introduce a real-time compatible artifact rejection algorithm (Stimulation Artifact Source Separation, SASS) that overcomes this limitation. SASS is a spatial filter (linear projection) removing EEG signal components that are maximally different in the presence versus absence of stimulation. This enables the reliable removal of stimulation-specific signal components, while leaving physiological signal components unaffected. For validation of SASS, we evoked brain activity with known phase and amplitude using 10 Hz visual flickers across 7 healthy human volunteers. 64-channel EEG was recorded during and in absence of 10 Hz AM-tACS targeting the visual cortex. Phase differences between AM-tACS and the visual stimuli were randomized, so that steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were phase-locked to the visual stimuli but not to the AM-tACS signal. For validation, distributions of single-trial amplitude and phase of EEG signals recorded during and in absence of AM-tACS were compared for each participant. When no artifact rejection method was applied, AM-tACS stimulation artifacts impeded assessment of single-trial SSVEP amplitude and phase. Using SASS, amplitude and phase of single trials recorded during and in absence of AM-tACS were comparable. These results indicate that SASS can be used to establish adaptive (closed-loop) AM-tACS, a potentially powerful tool to target various brain functions, and to investigate how AM-tACS interacts with electric brain oscillations. Academic Press 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7903161/ /pubmed/33412281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117571 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Haslacher, David
Nasr, Khaled
Robinson, Stephen E.
Braun, Christoph
Soekadar, Surjo R.
Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
title Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
title_full Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
title_fullStr Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
title_full_unstemmed Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
title_short Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
title_sort stimulation artifact source separation (sass) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tacs)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33412281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117571
work_keys_str_mv AT haslacherdavid stimulationartifactsourceseparationsassforassessingelectricbrainoscillationsduringtranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationtacs
AT nasrkhaled stimulationartifactsourceseparationsassforassessingelectricbrainoscillationsduringtranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationtacs
AT robinsonstephene stimulationartifactsourceseparationsassforassessingelectricbrainoscillationsduringtranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationtacs
AT braunchristoph stimulationartifactsourceseparationsassforassessingelectricbrainoscillationsduringtranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationtacs
AT soekadarsurjor stimulationartifactsourceseparationsassforassessingelectricbrainoscillationsduringtranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationtacs