Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation and Radiotherapy Treatment for Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: Cervical cancer is the second most common type of cancer and cause of death from cancer in Indonesia. In 2013, cervical cancer was the most prevalent cancer in Indonesia, with a rate of 0.8 per 1000 women. Based on the National Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Medical Services in Indonesia, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puspitasari, Irma M, Legianawati, Dewi, Sinuraya, Rano K, Suwantika, Auliya A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33642882
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S289781
_version_ 1783654682141392896
author Puspitasari, Irma M
Legianawati, Dewi
Sinuraya, Rano K
Suwantika, Auliya A
author_facet Puspitasari, Irma M
Legianawati, Dewi
Sinuraya, Rano K
Suwantika, Auliya A
author_sort Puspitasari, Irma M
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cervical cancer is the second most common type of cancer and cause of death from cancer in Indonesia. In 2013, cervical cancer was the most prevalent cancer in Indonesia, with a rate of 0.8 per 1000 women. Based on the National Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Medical Services in Indonesia, the recommended therapy for stages IIB-IIIB cervical cancer is chemoradiation or radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of chemoradiation and radiotherapy for treating stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer in a national referral hospital in Indonesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study from a healthcare perspective using retrospective patient data was conducted. The included patients had stage IIB-IIIB registered cervical cancer, were in the hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, received chemoradiation or radiotherapy, were ≥18 years old, and had complete clinical data and detailed cost of therapy data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated, and a sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: The average treatment cost per patient was $2944 and $3231 for radiotherapy and chemoradiation, respectively. Despite the fact that the treatment effectiveness of chemoradiation (69.1%) was considered to be higher than that of radiotherapy (63.2%), chemoradiation had more potential side effects than radiotherapy. In a comparison with radiotherapy, the ICER of chemoradiation was $48.6 per complete response rate. Additionally, the cost of radiotherapy was the most influential parameter impacting the ICER. CONCLUSION: Chemoradiation was considered to be more costly than radiotherapy. Additionally, the effectiveness of chemoradiation was higher than that of radiotherapy. A cost utility analysis (CUA) is required for further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7903166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79031662021-02-25 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation and Radiotherapy Treatment for Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients Puspitasari, Irma M Legianawati, Dewi Sinuraya, Rano K Suwantika, Auliya A Int J Womens Health Original Research PURPOSE: Cervical cancer is the second most common type of cancer and cause of death from cancer in Indonesia. In 2013, cervical cancer was the most prevalent cancer in Indonesia, with a rate of 0.8 per 1000 women. Based on the National Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Medical Services in Indonesia, the recommended therapy for stages IIB-IIIB cervical cancer is chemoradiation or radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of chemoradiation and radiotherapy for treating stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer in a national referral hospital in Indonesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study from a healthcare perspective using retrospective patient data was conducted. The included patients had stage IIB-IIIB registered cervical cancer, were in the hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017, received chemoradiation or radiotherapy, were ≥18 years old, and had complete clinical data and detailed cost of therapy data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated, and a sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: The average treatment cost per patient was $2944 and $3231 for radiotherapy and chemoradiation, respectively. Despite the fact that the treatment effectiveness of chemoradiation (69.1%) was considered to be higher than that of radiotherapy (63.2%), chemoradiation had more potential side effects than radiotherapy. In a comparison with radiotherapy, the ICER of chemoradiation was $48.6 per complete response rate. Additionally, the cost of radiotherapy was the most influential parameter impacting the ICER. CONCLUSION: Chemoradiation was considered to be more costly than radiotherapy. Additionally, the effectiveness of chemoradiation was higher than that of radiotherapy. A cost utility analysis (CUA) is required for further investigation. Dove 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7903166/ /pubmed/33642882 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S289781 Text en © 2021 Puspitasari et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Puspitasari, Irma M
Legianawati, Dewi
Sinuraya, Rano K
Suwantika, Auliya A
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation and Radiotherapy Treatment for Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation and Radiotherapy Treatment for Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation and Radiotherapy Treatment for Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation and Radiotherapy Treatment for Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation and Radiotherapy Treatment for Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation and Radiotherapy Treatment for Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer Patients
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of chemoradiation and radiotherapy treatment for stage iib and iiib cervical cancer patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33642882
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S289781
work_keys_str_mv AT puspitasariirmam costeffectivenessanalysisofchemoradiationandradiotherapytreatmentforstageiibandiiibcervicalcancerpatients
AT legianawatidewi costeffectivenessanalysisofchemoradiationandradiotherapytreatmentforstageiibandiiibcervicalcancerpatients
AT sinurayaranok costeffectivenessanalysisofchemoradiationandradiotherapytreatmentforstageiibandiiibcervicalcancerpatients
AT suwantikaauliyaa costeffectivenessanalysisofchemoradiationandradiotherapytreatmentforstageiibandiiibcervicalcancerpatients