Cargando…
Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study
INTRODUCTION: Limited literature exists regarding the positional relationship between the pedicled-rectus abdominis myocutaneous (p-RAMC) flap and residual pelvic organs post posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE). PRESENTATION OF CASE: Four patients underwent PPE and reconstruction with a p-RAMC flap....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.02.015 |
_version_ | 1783654714073677824 |
---|---|
author | Kitano, Daiki Osaki, Takeo Sakakibara, Shunsuke Nomura, Tadashi Hashikawa, Kazunobu Terashi, Hiroto |
author_facet | Kitano, Daiki Osaki, Takeo Sakakibara, Shunsuke Nomura, Tadashi Hashikawa, Kazunobu Terashi, Hiroto |
author_sort | Kitano, Daiki |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Limited literature exists regarding the positional relationship between the pedicled-rectus abdominis myocutaneous (p-RAMC) flap and residual pelvic organs post posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE). PRESENTATION OF CASE: Four patients underwent PPE and reconstruction with a p-RAMC flap. After harvesting the p-RAMC flap with the deep inferior epigastric artery and veins as the vascular pedicle, the intra-pelvic shortest pathway of the flap was created. We dissected the subcutaneous tissues of the flap donor site toward the perineal defect along the inner wall of the pelvis. The pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle was preserved. A three-dimensional model was constructed using an image processing software. The vascular pedicle ran almost linearly along the inner wall of the pelvis. The muscle belly was placed on the pelvic floor through the posterior wall of the urinary bladder which filled the dead space of the resected area. All flaps survived without significant complications. DISCUSSION: Assigning the cranial side of the flap to the perineum and caudal side to the pelvic floor could reduce postoperative intrapelvic complications. By preserving the pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle, a shock absorber of the pedicle of the flap was created, preventing over-traction of the flap while passing through the intrapelvic pathway. CONCLUSION: A p-RAMC flap via intra-pelvic shortest pathway is an ideal reconstructive method for large skin defect in perineal area after PPE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7903330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79033302021-03-03 Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study Kitano, Daiki Osaki, Takeo Sakakibara, Shunsuke Nomura, Tadashi Hashikawa, Kazunobu Terashi, Hiroto Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series INTRODUCTION: Limited literature exists regarding the positional relationship between the pedicled-rectus abdominis myocutaneous (p-RAMC) flap and residual pelvic organs post posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE). PRESENTATION OF CASE: Four patients underwent PPE and reconstruction with a p-RAMC flap. After harvesting the p-RAMC flap with the deep inferior epigastric artery and veins as the vascular pedicle, the intra-pelvic shortest pathway of the flap was created. We dissected the subcutaneous tissues of the flap donor site toward the perineal defect along the inner wall of the pelvis. The pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle was preserved. A three-dimensional model was constructed using an image processing software. The vascular pedicle ran almost linearly along the inner wall of the pelvis. The muscle belly was placed on the pelvic floor through the posterior wall of the urinary bladder which filled the dead space of the resected area. All flaps survived without significant complications. DISCUSSION: Assigning the cranial side of the flap to the perineum and caudal side to the pelvic floor could reduce postoperative intrapelvic complications. By preserving the pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle, a shock absorber of the pedicle of the flap was created, preventing over-traction of the flap while passing through the intrapelvic pathway. CONCLUSION: A p-RAMC flap via intra-pelvic shortest pathway is an ideal reconstructive method for large skin defect in perineal area after PPE. Elsevier 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7903330/ /pubmed/33609946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.02.015 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Series Kitano, Daiki Osaki, Takeo Sakakibara, Shunsuke Nomura, Tadashi Hashikawa, Kazunobu Terashi, Hiroto Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study |
title | Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study |
title_full | Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study |
title_fullStr | Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study |
title_full_unstemmed | Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study |
title_short | Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study |
title_sort | perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –a 3d model study |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.02.015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitanodaiki perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy AT osakitakeo perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy AT sakakibarashunsuke perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy AT nomuratadashi perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy AT hashikawakazunobu perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy AT terashihiroto perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy |