Cargando…

Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study

INTRODUCTION: Limited literature exists regarding the positional relationship between the pedicled-rectus abdominis myocutaneous (p-RAMC) flap and residual pelvic organs post posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE). PRESENTATION OF CASE: Four patients underwent PPE and reconstruction with a p-RAMC flap....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitano, Daiki, Osaki, Takeo, Sakakibara, Shunsuke, Nomura, Tadashi, Hashikawa, Kazunobu, Terashi, Hiroto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.02.015
_version_ 1783654714073677824
author Kitano, Daiki
Osaki, Takeo
Sakakibara, Shunsuke
Nomura, Tadashi
Hashikawa, Kazunobu
Terashi, Hiroto
author_facet Kitano, Daiki
Osaki, Takeo
Sakakibara, Shunsuke
Nomura, Tadashi
Hashikawa, Kazunobu
Terashi, Hiroto
author_sort Kitano, Daiki
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Limited literature exists regarding the positional relationship between the pedicled-rectus abdominis myocutaneous (p-RAMC) flap and residual pelvic organs post posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE). PRESENTATION OF CASE: Four patients underwent PPE and reconstruction with a p-RAMC flap. After harvesting the p-RAMC flap with the deep inferior epigastric artery and veins as the vascular pedicle, the intra-pelvic shortest pathway of the flap was created. We dissected the subcutaneous tissues of the flap donor site toward the perineal defect along the inner wall of the pelvis. The pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle was preserved. A three-dimensional model was constructed using an image processing software. The vascular pedicle ran almost linearly along the inner wall of the pelvis. The muscle belly was placed on the pelvic floor through the posterior wall of the urinary bladder which filled the dead space of the resected area. All flaps survived without significant complications. DISCUSSION: Assigning the cranial side of the flap to the perineum and caudal side to the pelvic floor could reduce postoperative intrapelvic complications. By preserving the pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle, a shock absorber of the pedicle of the flap was created, preventing over-traction of the flap while passing through the intrapelvic pathway. CONCLUSION: A p-RAMC flap via intra-pelvic shortest pathway is an ideal reconstructive method for large skin defect in perineal area after PPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7903330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79033302021-03-03 Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study Kitano, Daiki Osaki, Takeo Sakakibara, Shunsuke Nomura, Tadashi Hashikawa, Kazunobu Terashi, Hiroto Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series INTRODUCTION: Limited literature exists regarding the positional relationship between the pedicled-rectus abdominis myocutaneous (p-RAMC) flap and residual pelvic organs post posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE). PRESENTATION OF CASE: Four patients underwent PPE and reconstruction with a p-RAMC flap. After harvesting the p-RAMC flap with the deep inferior epigastric artery and veins as the vascular pedicle, the intra-pelvic shortest pathway of the flap was created. We dissected the subcutaneous tissues of the flap donor site toward the perineal defect along the inner wall of the pelvis. The pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle was preserved. A three-dimensional model was constructed using an image processing software. The vascular pedicle ran almost linearly along the inner wall of the pelvis. The muscle belly was placed on the pelvic floor through the posterior wall of the urinary bladder which filled the dead space of the resected area. All flaps survived without significant complications. DISCUSSION: Assigning the cranial side of the flap to the perineum and caudal side to the pelvic floor could reduce postoperative intrapelvic complications. By preserving the pubic origin of the rectus abdominis muscle, a shock absorber of the pedicle of the flap was created, preventing over-traction of the flap while passing through the intrapelvic pathway. CONCLUSION: A p-RAMC flap via intra-pelvic shortest pathway is an ideal reconstructive method for large skin defect in perineal area after PPE. Elsevier 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7903330/ /pubmed/33609946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.02.015 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Kitano, Daiki
Osaki, Takeo
Sakakibara, Shunsuke
Nomura, Tadashi
Hashikawa, Kazunobu
Terashi, Hiroto
Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study
title Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study
title_full Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study
title_fullStr Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study
title_full_unstemmed Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study
title_short Perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –A 3D model study
title_sort perineal reconstruction with pedicled rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after posterior pelvic exenteration –a 3d model study
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.02.015
work_keys_str_mv AT kitanodaiki perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy
AT osakitakeo perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy
AT sakakibarashunsuke perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy
AT nomuratadashi perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy
AT hashikawakazunobu perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy
AT terashihiroto perinealreconstructionwithpedicledrectusabdominismyocutaneousflapafterposteriorpelvicexenterationa3dmodelstudy