Cargando…

Disaster safety assessment of primary healthcare facilities: a cross-sectional study in Kurdistan province of Iran

BACKGROUND: Kurdistan province of Iran is among disaster prone areas of the country. The Primary Health Care facilities in Iran deliver health services at all levels nationwide. Resiliency and flexibility of such facilities is important when a disaster occurs. Thus, evaluating functional, structural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yari, Arezoo, Zarezadeh, Yadolah, Fatemi, Farin, Ardalan, Ali, Vahedi, Siamak, Yousefi-Khoshsabeghe, Homa, Boubakran, Mohsen Soufi, Bidarpoor, Farzam, Motlagh, Mohamad Esmaeil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00417-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Kurdistan province of Iran is among disaster prone areas of the country. The Primary Health Care facilities in Iran deliver health services at all levels nationwide. Resiliency and flexibility of such facilities is important when a disaster occurs. Thus, evaluating functional, structural, and non-structural aspects of safety of such facilities is essential. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the instrument used to evaluate four sections of functional, structural, non-structural, and total safety of 805 healthcare facilities in Kurdistan Province was the safety evaluation checklist of primary healthcare centers, provided by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Each section scored from 0 to 100 points, and each section of the safety was classified to three safety classes according to their total score: low (≤34.0), average (34.01–66.0) and high (> 66.0). RESULTS: The levels of functional, structural, non-structural and total safety were equal to 23.8, 20.2, 42.3 and 28.7, out of 100, respectively. Regarding the functional safety, rapid response team scored the highest, while financial affairs scored the lowest. Nevertheless, in structural and non-structural sections, the scores of different items were almost similar. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study revealed that safety score of primary healthcare facilities in general was unsatisfactory. Thus, promoting preparedness, resilience and continuity of service delivery of these facilities are essential to response to disasters and emergencies. The finding of this study could be beneficial for national and provincial decision-makers and policymakers in this regard. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00417-3.