Cargando…

Sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma

BACKGROUND: In the clinical setting, workflows for analyzing individual genomics data should be both comprehensive and convenient for clinical interpretation. In an effort for comprehensiveness and practicality, we attempted to create a clinical individual whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis workf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ülgen, Ege, Can, Özge, Bilguvar, Kaya, Akyerli Boylu, Cemaliye, Kılıçturgay Yüksel, Şirin, Erşen Danyeli, Ayça, Sezerman, O. Uğur, Yakıcıer, M. Cengiz, Pamir, M. Necmettin, Özduman, Koray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-00904-3
_version_ 1783654801088708608
author Ülgen, Ege
Can, Özge
Bilguvar, Kaya
Akyerli Boylu, Cemaliye
Kılıçturgay Yüksel, Şirin
Erşen Danyeli, Ayça
Sezerman, O. Uğur
Yakıcıer, M. Cengiz
Pamir, M. Necmettin
Özduman, Koray
author_facet Ülgen, Ege
Can, Özge
Bilguvar, Kaya
Akyerli Boylu, Cemaliye
Kılıçturgay Yüksel, Şirin
Erşen Danyeli, Ayça
Sezerman, O. Uğur
Yakıcıer, M. Cengiz
Pamir, M. Necmettin
Özduman, Koray
author_sort Ülgen, Ege
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the clinical setting, workflows for analyzing individual genomics data should be both comprehensive and convenient for clinical interpretation. In an effort for comprehensiveness and practicality, we attempted to create a clinical individual whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis workflow, allowing identification of genomic alterations and presentation of neurooncologically-relevant findings. METHODS: The analysis workflow detects germline and somatic variants and presents: (1) germline variants, (2) somatic short variants, (3) tumor mutational burden (TMB), (4) microsatellite instability (MSI), (5) somatic copy number alterations (SCNA), (6) SCNA burden, (7) loss of heterozygosity, (8) genes with double-hit, (9) mutational signatures, and (10) pathway enrichment analyses. Using the workflow, 58 WES analyses from matched blood and tumor samples of 52 patients were analyzed: 47 primary and 11 recurrent diffuse gliomas. RESULTS: The median mean read depths were 199.88 for tumor and 110.955 for normal samples. For germline variants, a median of 22 (14–33) variants per patient was reported. There was a median of 6 (0–590) reported somatic short variants per tumor. A median of 19 (0–94) broad SCNAs and a median of 6 (0–12) gene-level SCNAs were reported per tumor. The gene with the most frequent somatic short variants was TP53 (41.38%). The most frequent chromosome-/arm-level SCNA events were chr7 amplification, chr22q loss, and chr10 loss. TMB in primary gliomas were significantly lower than in recurrent tumors (p = 0.002). MSI incidence was low (6.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that WES can be practically and efficiently utilized for clinical analysis of individual brain tumors. The results display that NOTATES produces clinically relevant results in a concise but exhaustive manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7903763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79037632021-03-01 Sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma Ülgen, Ege Can, Özge Bilguvar, Kaya Akyerli Boylu, Cemaliye Kılıçturgay Yüksel, Şirin Erşen Danyeli, Ayça Sezerman, O. Uğur Yakıcıer, M. Cengiz Pamir, M. Necmettin Özduman, Koray BMC Med Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: In the clinical setting, workflows for analyzing individual genomics data should be both comprehensive and convenient for clinical interpretation. In an effort for comprehensiveness and practicality, we attempted to create a clinical individual whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis workflow, allowing identification of genomic alterations and presentation of neurooncologically-relevant findings. METHODS: The analysis workflow detects germline and somatic variants and presents: (1) germline variants, (2) somatic short variants, (3) tumor mutational burden (TMB), (4) microsatellite instability (MSI), (5) somatic copy number alterations (SCNA), (6) SCNA burden, (7) loss of heterozygosity, (8) genes with double-hit, (9) mutational signatures, and (10) pathway enrichment analyses. Using the workflow, 58 WES analyses from matched blood and tumor samples of 52 patients were analyzed: 47 primary and 11 recurrent diffuse gliomas. RESULTS: The median mean read depths were 199.88 for tumor and 110.955 for normal samples. For germline variants, a median of 22 (14–33) variants per patient was reported. There was a median of 6 (0–590) reported somatic short variants per tumor. A median of 19 (0–94) broad SCNAs and a median of 6 (0–12) gene-level SCNAs were reported per tumor. The gene with the most frequent somatic short variants was TP53 (41.38%). The most frequent chromosome-/arm-level SCNA events were chr7 amplification, chr22q loss, and chr10 loss. TMB in primary gliomas were significantly lower than in recurrent tumors (p = 0.002). MSI incidence was low (6.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that WES can be practically and efficiently utilized for clinical analysis of individual brain tumors. The results display that NOTATES produces clinically relevant results in a concise but exhaustive manner. BioMed Central 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7903763/ /pubmed/33622343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-00904-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ülgen, Ege
Can, Özge
Bilguvar, Kaya
Akyerli Boylu, Cemaliye
Kılıçturgay Yüksel, Şirin
Erşen Danyeli, Ayça
Sezerman, O. Uğur
Yakıcıer, M. Cengiz
Pamir, M. Necmettin
Özduman, Koray
Sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma
title Sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma
title_full Sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma
title_fullStr Sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma
title_full_unstemmed Sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma
title_short Sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma
title_sort sequential filtering for clinically relevant variants as a method for clinical interpretation of whole exome sequencing findings in glioma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-021-00904-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ulgenege sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT canozge sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT bilguvarkaya sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT akyerliboylucemaliye sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT kılıcturgayyukselsirin sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT ersendanyeliayca sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT sezermanougur sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT yakıcıermcengiz sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT pamirmnecmettin sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma
AT ozdumankoray sequentialfilteringforclinicallyrelevantvariantsasamethodforclinicalinterpretationofwholeexomesequencingfindingsinglioma