Cargando…
Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements
BACKGROUND: In 2017, the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) started developing a methodological framework for a guideline-based quality assurance (QA) scheme to improve cancer quality of care. During the first phase of the work, inconsistency emerged about the use of terminology for t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06148-2 |
_version_ | 1783654805162426368 |
---|---|
author | Parmelli, Elena Langendam, Miranda Piggott, Thomas Adolfsson, Jan Akl, Elie A. Armstrong, David Braithwaite, Jeffrey Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Follmann, Markus Leś, Zbigniew Meerpohl, Joerg J. Neamtiu, Luciana Qaseem, Amir Rossi, Paolo Giorgi Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika van der Wees, Philip J. Schünemann, Holger J. |
author_facet | Parmelli, Elena Langendam, Miranda Piggott, Thomas Adolfsson, Jan Akl, Elie A. Armstrong, David Braithwaite, Jeffrey Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Follmann, Markus Leś, Zbigniew Meerpohl, Joerg J. Neamtiu, Luciana Qaseem, Amir Rossi, Paolo Giorgi Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika van der Wees, Philip J. Schünemann, Holger J. |
author_sort | Parmelli, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2017, the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) started developing a methodological framework for a guideline-based quality assurance (QA) scheme to improve cancer quality of care. During the first phase of the work, inconsistency emerged about the use of terminology for the definition, the conceptual underpinnings and the way QA relates to health questions that are answered in guidelines. The objective of this final of three articles is to propose a conceptual framework for an integrated approach to guideline and QA development and clarify terms and definitions for key elements. This work will inform the upcoming European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (ECICC). METHODS: A multidisciplinary group of 23 experts from key organizations in the fields of guideline development, performance measurement and quality assurance participated in a mixed method approach including face-to-face dialogue and several rounds of virtual meetings. Informed by results of a systematic literature review that indicated absence of an existing framework and practical examples, we first identified the relations of key elements in guideline-based QA and then developed appropriate concepts and terminology to provide guidance. RESULTS: Our framework connects the three key concepts of quality indicators, performance measures and performance indicators integrated with guideline development. Quality indicators are constructs used as a guide to monitor, evaluate, and improve the quality of the structure, process and outcomes of healthcare services; performance measures are tools that quantify or describe measurable elements of practice performance; and performance indicators are quantifiable and measurable units or scores of practice, which should be guided by guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The inconsistency in the way key terms of QA are used and defined has confused the field. Our conceptual framework defines the role, meaning and interactions of the key elements for improving quality in healthcare. It directly builds on the questions asked in guidelines and answered through recommendations. These findings will be applied in the forthcoming ECICC and for the future updates of ECIBC. These are large-scale integrated projects aimed at improving healthcare quality across Europe through the development of guideline-based QA schemes; this will help in implementing and improving our approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7903784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79037842021-02-25 Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements Parmelli, Elena Langendam, Miranda Piggott, Thomas Adolfsson, Jan Akl, Elie A. Armstrong, David Braithwaite, Jeffrey Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Follmann, Markus Leś, Zbigniew Meerpohl, Joerg J. Neamtiu, Luciana Qaseem, Amir Rossi, Paolo Giorgi Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika van der Wees, Philip J. Schünemann, Holger J. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2017, the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) started developing a methodological framework for a guideline-based quality assurance (QA) scheme to improve cancer quality of care. During the first phase of the work, inconsistency emerged about the use of terminology for the definition, the conceptual underpinnings and the way QA relates to health questions that are answered in guidelines. The objective of this final of three articles is to propose a conceptual framework for an integrated approach to guideline and QA development and clarify terms and definitions for key elements. This work will inform the upcoming European Commission Initiative on Colorectal Cancer (ECICC). METHODS: A multidisciplinary group of 23 experts from key organizations in the fields of guideline development, performance measurement and quality assurance participated in a mixed method approach including face-to-face dialogue and several rounds of virtual meetings. Informed by results of a systematic literature review that indicated absence of an existing framework and practical examples, we first identified the relations of key elements in guideline-based QA and then developed appropriate concepts and terminology to provide guidance. RESULTS: Our framework connects the three key concepts of quality indicators, performance measures and performance indicators integrated with guideline development. Quality indicators are constructs used as a guide to monitor, evaluate, and improve the quality of the structure, process and outcomes of healthcare services; performance measures are tools that quantify or describe measurable elements of practice performance; and performance indicators are quantifiable and measurable units or scores of practice, which should be guided by guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The inconsistency in the way key terms of QA are used and defined has confused the field. Our conceptual framework defines the role, meaning and interactions of the key elements for improving quality in healthcare. It directly builds on the questions asked in guidelines and answered through recommendations. These findings will be applied in the forthcoming ECICC and for the future updates of ECIBC. These are large-scale integrated projects aimed at improving healthcare quality across Europe through the development of guideline-based QA schemes; this will help in implementing and improving our approach. BioMed Central 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7903784/ /pubmed/33627092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06148-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parmelli, Elena Langendam, Miranda Piggott, Thomas Adolfsson, Jan Akl, Elie A. Armstrong, David Braithwaite, Jeffrey Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Follmann, Markus Leś, Zbigniew Meerpohl, Joerg J. Neamtiu, Luciana Qaseem, Amir Rossi, Paolo Giorgi Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika van der Wees, Philip J. Schünemann, Holger J. Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements |
title | Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements |
title_full | Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements |
title_fullStr | Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements |
title_full_unstemmed | Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements |
title_short | Guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements |
title_sort | guideline-based quality assurance: a conceptual framework for the definition of key elements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06148-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parmellielena guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT langendammiranda guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT piggottthomas guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT adolfssonjan guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT akleliea guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT armstrongdavid guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT braithwaitejeffrey guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT brignardellopetersenromina guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT follmannmarkus guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT leszbigniew guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT meerpohljoergj guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT neamtiuluciana guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT qaseemamir guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT rossipaologiorgi guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT sazparkinsonzuleika guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT vanderweesphilipj guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements AT schunemannholgerj guidelinebasedqualityassuranceaconceptualframeworkforthedefinitionofkeyelements |