Cargando…
The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping
Improving photosynthesis is considered a promising way to increase crop yield to feed a growing population. Realizing this goal requires non-destructive techniques to quantify photosynthetic variation among crop cultivars. Despite existing remote sensing-based approaches, it remains a question wheth...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa537 |
_version_ | 1783654871461789696 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Peng Meacham-Hensold, Katherine Siebers, Matthew H Bernacchi, Carl J |
author_facet | Fu, Peng Meacham-Hensold, Katherine Siebers, Matthew H Bernacchi, Carl J |
author_sort | Fu, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Improving photosynthesis is considered a promising way to increase crop yield to feed a growing population. Realizing this goal requires non-destructive techniques to quantify photosynthetic variation among crop cultivars. Despite existing remote sensing-based approaches, it remains a question whether solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) can facilitate screening crop cultivars of improved photosynthetic capacity in plant breeding trials. Here we tested a hypothesis that SIF yield rather than SIF had a better relationship with the maximum electron transport rate (J(max)). Time-synchronized hyperspectral images and irradiance spectra of sunlight under clear-sky conditions were combined to estimate SIF and SIF yield, which were then correlated with ground-truth V(cmax) and J(max). With observations binned over time (i.e. group 1: 6, 7, and 12 July 2017; group 2: 31 July and 18 August 2017; and group 3: 24 and 25 July 2018), SIF yield showed a stronger negative relationship, compared with SIF, with photosynthetic variables. Using SIF yield for J(max) (V(cmax)) predictions, the regression analysis exhibited an R(2) of 0.62 (0.71) and root mean square error (RMSE) of 11.88 (46.86) μmol m(–2) s(–1) for group 1, an R(2) of 0.85 (0.72) and RMSE of 13.51 (49.32) μmol m(–2) s(–1) for group 2, and an R(2) of 0.92 (0.87) and RMSE of 15.23 (30.29) μmol m(–2) s(–1) for group 3. The combined use of hyperspectral images and irradiance measurements provides an alternative yet promising approach to characterization of photosynthetic parameters at plot level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7904154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79041542021-03-02 The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping Fu, Peng Meacham-Hensold, Katherine Siebers, Matthew H Bernacchi, Carl J J Exp Bot Research Papers Improving photosynthesis is considered a promising way to increase crop yield to feed a growing population. Realizing this goal requires non-destructive techniques to quantify photosynthetic variation among crop cultivars. Despite existing remote sensing-based approaches, it remains a question whether solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) can facilitate screening crop cultivars of improved photosynthetic capacity in plant breeding trials. Here we tested a hypothesis that SIF yield rather than SIF had a better relationship with the maximum electron transport rate (J(max)). Time-synchronized hyperspectral images and irradiance spectra of sunlight under clear-sky conditions were combined to estimate SIF and SIF yield, which were then correlated with ground-truth V(cmax) and J(max). With observations binned over time (i.e. group 1: 6, 7, and 12 July 2017; group 2: 31 July and 18 August 2017; and group 3: 24 and 25 July 2018), SIF yield showed a stronger negative relationship, compared with SIF, with photosynthetic variables. Using SIF yield for J(max) (V(cmax)) predictions, the regression analysis exhibited an R(2) of 0.62 (0.71) and root mean square error (RMSE) of 11.88 (46.86) μmol m(–2) s(–1) for group 1, an R(2) of 0.85 (0.72) and RMSE of 13.51 (49.32) μmol m(–2) s(–1) for group 2, and an R(2) of 0.92 (0.87) and RMSE of 15.23 (30.29) μmol m(–2) s(–1) for group 3. The combined use of hyperspectral images and irradiance measurements provides an alternative yet promising approach to characterization of photosynthetic parameters at plot level. Oxford University Press 2020-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7904154/ /pubmed/33340310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa537 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Fu, Peng Meacham-Hensold, Katherine Siebers, Matthew H Bernacchi, Carl J The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping |
title | The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping |
title_full | The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping |
title_fullStr | The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping |
title_short | The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping |
title_sort | inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33340310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa537 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fupeng theinverserelationshipbetweensolarinducedfluorescenceyieldandphotosyntheticcapacitybenefitsforfieldphenotyping AT meachamhensoldkatherine theinverserelationshipbetweensolarinducedfluorescenceyieldandphotosyntheticcapacitybenefitsforfieldphenotyping AT siebersmatthewh theinverserelationshipbetweensolarinducedfluorescenceyieldandphotosyntheticcapacitybenefitsforfieldphenotyping AT bernacchicarlj theinverserelationshipbetweensolarinducedfluorescenceyieldandphotosyntheticcapacitybenefitsforfieldphenotyping AT fupeng inverserelationshipbetweensolarinducedfluorescenceyieldandphotosyntheticcapacitybenefitsforfieldphenotyping AT meachamhensoldkatherine inverserelationshipbetweensolarinducedfluorescenceyieldandphotosyntheticcapacitybenefitsforfieldphenotyping AT siebersmatthewh inverserelationshipbetweensolarinducedfluorescenceyieldandphotosyntheticcapacitybenefitsforfieldphenotyping AT bernacchicarlj inverserelationshipbetweensolarinducedfluorescenceyieldandphotosyntheticcapacitybenefitsforfieldphenotyping |