Cargando…
Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Volunteers are increasingly promoted to improve health-related outcomes for community-dwelling elderly without synthesized evidence for effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effects of unpaid volunteer interventions on health-related outcomes for such seni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Canadian Geriatrics Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680263 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.434 |
_version_ | 1783654905318211584 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Ainsley Motagh, Shahrzad Sadeghirad, Behnam Begum, Housne Riva, John J. Gaber, Jessica Dolovich, Lisa |
author_facet | Moore, Ainsley Motagh, Shahrzad Sadeghirad, Behnam Begum, Housne Riva, John J. Gaber, Jessica Dolovich, Lisa |
author_sort | Moore, Ainsley |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Volunteers are increasingly promoted to improve health-related outcomes for community-dwelling elderly without synthesized evidence for effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effects of unpaid volunteer interventions on health-related outcomes for such seniors. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane (CENTRAL) were searched up to November 2018. We included English language, randomized trials. Two reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed evidence certainty (using GRADE). Meta-analysis used random-effects models. Univariate meta-regressions investigated the relationship between volunteer intervention effects and trial participant age, percentage females, and risk of bias. RESULTS: 28 included studies focussed on seniors with a variety of chronic conditions (e.g., dementia, diabetes) and health states (e.g., frail, palliative). Volunteers provided a range of roles (e.g., counsellors, educators and coaches). Low certainty evidence found that volunteers may improve both physical function (MD = 3.2 points on the 100-point SF-36 physical component score [PCS]; 95% CI: 1.09, 5.27) and physical activity levels (SMD = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.83). Adverse events were not increased. CONCLUSION: Volunteers may increase physical activity levels and subjective ratings of physical function for seniors without apparent harm. These findings support the WHO call to action on evidence-based policies to align health systems in support of older adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7904324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Canadian Geriatrics Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79043242021-03-05 Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Moore, Ainsley Motagh, Shahrzad Sadeghirad, Behnam Begum, Housne Riva, John J. Gaber, Jessica Dolovich, Lisa Can Geriatr J Systemic Reviews/Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Volunteers are increasingly promoted to improve health-related outcomes for community-dwelling elderly without synthesized evidence for effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effects of unpaid volunteer interventions on health-related outcomes for such seniors. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane (CENTRAL) were searched up to November 2018. We included English language, randomized trials. Two reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed evidence certainty (using GRADE). Meta-analysis used random-effects models. Univariate meta-regressions investigated the relationship between volunteer intervention effects and trial participant age, percentage females, and risk of bias. RESULTS: 28 included studies focussed on seniors with a variety of chronic conditions (e.g., dementia, diabetes) and health states (e.g., frail, palliative). Volunteers provided a range of roles (e.g., counsellors, educators and coaches). Low certainty evidence found that volunteers may improve both physical function (MD = 3.2 points on the 100-point SF-36 physical component score [PCS]; 95% CI: 1.09, 5.27) and physical activity levels (SMD = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.83). Adverse events were not increased. CONCLUSION: Volunteers may increase physical activity levels and subjective ratings of physical function for seniors without apparent harm. These findings support the WHO call to action on evidence-based policies to align health systems in support of older adults. Canadian Geriatrics Society 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7904324/ /pubmed/33680263 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.434 Text en © 2021 Author(s). Published by the Canadian Geriatrics Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systemic Reviews/Meta-Analysis Moore, Ainsley Motagh, Shahrzad Sadeghirad, Behnam Begum, Housne Riva, John J. Gaber, Jessica Dolovich, Lisa Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis |
title | Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Volunteer Impact on Health-Related Outcomes for Seniors: a Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | volunteer impact on health-related outcomes for seniors: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systemic Reviews/Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680263 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooreainsley volunteerimpactonhealthrelatedoutcomesforseniorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT motaghshahrzad volunteerimpactonhealthrelatedoutcomesforseniorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sadeghiradbehnam volunteerimpactonhealthrelatedoutcomesforseniorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT begumhousne volunteerimpactonhealthrelatedoutcomesforseniorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rivajohnj volunteerimpactonhealthrelatedoutcomesforseniorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gaberjessica volunteerimpactonhealthrelatedoutcomesforseniorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dolovichlisa volunteerimpactonhealthrelatedoutcomesforseniorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |