Cargando…

The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported poor sensitivity and specificity of the Screen for the Identification of Cognitively Impaired Medically At-Risk Drivers, a modification of the DemTech (SIMARD-MD) to screen for drivers with cognitive impairment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crizzle, Alexander M., Mullen, Nadia, Mychael, Diane, Meger, Natasha, Toxopeus, Ryan, Gibbons, Carrie, Ostap, Simeon, Dubois, Sacha, Bédard, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Geriatrics Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680259
http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.444
_version_ 1783654905800556544
author Crizzle, Alexander M.
Mullen, Nadia
Mychael, Diane
Meger, Natasha
Toxopeus, Ryan
Gibbons, Carrie
Ostap, Simeon
Dubois, Sacha
Bédard, Michel
author_facet Crizzle, Alexander M.
Mullen, Nadia
Mychael, Diane
Meger, Natasha
Toxopeus, Ryan
Gibbons, Carrie
Ostap, Simeon
Dubois, Sacha
Bédard, Michel
author_sort Crizzle, Alexander M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have reported poor sensitivity and specificity of the Screen for the Identification of Cognitively Impaired Medically At-Risk Drivers, a modification of the DemTech (SIMARD-MD) to screen for drivers with cognitive impairment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the SIMARD-MD can accurately predict pass/fail on a road test in drivers with cognitive impairment (CI) and healthy drivers. METHODS: Data from drivers with CI were collected from two comprehensive driving assessment centres (n=86) and compared with healthy drivers (n=30). All participants completed demographic measures, clinical measures, and a road rest (pass/fail). Analyses consisted of correlations between the SIMARD-MD and the other clinical measures, and a receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the predictive ability of the SIMARD-MD. RESULTS: All healthy drivers passed the road test compared with 44.2% of the CI sample. On the SIMARD-MD, the CI sample scored significantly worse than healthy drivers (p < .001). The ROC curve showed the SIMARD-MD, regardless of any cut-point, misclassified a large number of CI individuals (AUC=.692; 95% CI = 0.578, 0.806). CONCLUSIONS: Given the high level of misclassification, the SIMARD-MD should not be used with either healthy drivers or those with cognitive impairment for making decisions about driving.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7904326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Canadian Geriatrics Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79043262021-03-05 The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive Crizzle, Alexander M. Mullen, Nadia Mychael, Diane Meger, Natasha Toxopeus, Ryan Gibbons, Carrie Ostap, Simeon Dubois, Sacha Bédard, Michel Can Geriatr J Original Research BACKGROUND: Studies have reported poor sensitivity and specificity of the Screen for the Identification of Cognitively Impaired Medically At-Risk Drivers, a modification of the DemTech (SIMARD-MD) to screen for drivers with cognitive impairment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the SIMARD-MD can accurately predict pass/fail on a road test in drivers with cognitive impairment (CI) and healthy drivers. METHODS: Data from drivers with CI were collected from two comprehensive driving assessment centres (n=86) and compared with healthy drivers (n=30). All participants completed demographic measures, clinical measures, and a road rest (pass/fail). Analyses consisted of correlations between the SIMARD-MD and the other clinical measures, and a receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the predictive ability of the SIMARD-MD. RESULTS: All healthy drivers passed the road test compared with 44.2% of the CI sample. On the SIMARD-MD, the CI sample scored significantly worse than healthy drivers (p < .001). The ROC curve showed the SIMARD-MD, regardless of any cut-point, misclassified a large number of CI individuals (AUC=.692; 95% CI = 0.578, 0.806). CONCLUSIONS: Given the high level of misclassification, the SIMARD-MD should not be used with either healthy drivers or those with cognitive impairment for making decisions about driving. Canadian Geriatrics Society 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7904326/ /pubmed/33680259 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.444 Text en © 2021 Author(s). Published by the Canadian Geriatrics Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Crizzle, Alexander M.
Mullen, Nadia
Mychael, Diane
Meger, Natasha
Toxopeus, Ryan
Gibbons, Carrie
Ostap, Simeon
Dubois, Sacha
Bédard, Michel
The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive
title The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive
title_full The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive
title_fullStr The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive
title_full_unstemmed The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive
title_short The SIMARD-MD is not an Effective Driver Screening Tool for Determining Fitness-To-Drive
title_sort simard-md is not an effective driver screening tool for determining fitness-to-drive
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680259
http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.24.444
work_keys_str_mv AT crizzlealexanderm thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT mullennadia thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT mychaeldiane thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT megernatasha thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT toxopeusryan thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT gibbonscarrie thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT ostapsimeon thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT duboissacha thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT bedardmichel thesimardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT crizzlealexanderm simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT mullennadia simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT mychaeldiane simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT megernatasha simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT toxopeusryan simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT gibbonscarrie simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT ostapsimeon simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT duboissacha simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive
AT bedardmichel simardmdisnotaneffectivedriverscreeningtoolfordeterminingfitnesstodrive