Cargando…
A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for over...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84054-7 |
_version_ | 1783655006168154112 |
---|---|
author | Izumi, Kouji Shima, Takashi Shigehara, Kazuyoshi Sawada, Kiyoshi Naito, Renato Kato, Yuki Ofude, Mitsuo Kano, Hiroshi Iwamoto, Hiroaki Yaegashi, Hiroshi Nakashima, Kazufumi Iijima, Masashi Kawaguchi, Shohei Nohara, Takahiro Kadono, Yoshifumi Mizokami, Atsushi |
author_facet | Izumi, Kouji Shima, Takashi Shigehara, Kazuyoshi Sawada, Kiyoshi Naito, Renato Kato, Yuki Ofude, Mitsuo Kano, Hiroshi Iwamoto, Hiroaki Yaegashi, Hiroshi Nakashima, Kazufumi Iijima, Masashi Kawaguchi, Shohei Nohara, Takahiro Kadono, Yoshifumi Mizokami, Atsushi |
author_sort | Izumi, Kouji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for overall survival that we previously developed, is effective in a large cohort. Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter diagnostic/prognostic study was conducted. Patients with MUO were divided into three risk groups based on the score calculated using four prognostic factors (PLaCT: Primary site, Laterality, serum Creatinine level, and Treatment for primary site) at the first visit, and prospective follow-up was performed. Overall survival and ureteral stent failure-free survival of each risk group were compared. In total, 300 patients with 21 different primary sites were enrolled. The numbers of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 105, 106, and 89, respectively. Median survival times of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 406, 221, and 77 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 217 patients with ureteral stenting, median ureteral stent failure-free survival times of good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 385, 183, and 57 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Limitations include the limited ethnicity and the extended duration of study enrollment. The novel PLaCT risk classification score could divide MUO patients into three risk groups with distinct survival times and ureteral stent patencies. This score will aid in establishing prognosis and treatment strategy for all physicians engaged in cancer treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7904864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79048642021-02-25 A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study Izumi, Kouji Shima, Takashi Shigehara, Kazuyoshi Sawada, Kiyoshi Naito, Renato Kato, Yuki Ofude, Mitsuo Kano, Hiroshi Iwamoto, Hiroaki Yaegashi, Hiroshi Nakashima, Kazufumi Iijima, Masashi Kawaguchi, Shohei Nohara, Takahiro Kadono, Yoshifumi Mizokami, Atsushi Sci Rep Article Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for overall survival that we previously developed, is effective in a large cohort. Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter diagnostic/prognostic study was conducted. Patients with MUO were divided into three risk groups based on the score calculated using four prognostic factors (PLaCT: Primary site, Laterality, serum Creatinine level, and Treatment for primary site) at the first visit, and prospective follow-up was performed. Overall survival and ureteral stent failure-free survival of each risk group were compared. In total, 300 patients with 21 different primary sites were enrolled. The numbers of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 105, 106, and 89, respectively. Median survival times of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 406, 221, and 77 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 217 patients with ureteral stenting, median ureteral stent failure-free survival times of good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 385, 183, and 57 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Limitations include the limited ethnicity and the extended duration of study enrollment. The novel PLaCT risk classification score could divide MUO patients into three risk groups with distinct survival times and ureteral stent patencies. This score will aid in establishing prognosis and treatment strategy for all physicians engaged in cancer treatment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7904864/ /pubmed/33627826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84054-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Izumi, Kouji Shima, Takashi Shigehara, Kazuyoshi Sawada, Kiyoshi Naito, Renato Kato, Yuki Ofude, Mitsuo Kano, Hiroshi Iwamoto, Hiroaki Yaegashi, Hiroshi Nakashima, Kazufumi Iijima, Masashi Kawaguchi, Shohei Nohara, Takahiro Kadono, Yoshifumi Mizokami, Atsushi A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study |
title | A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study |
title_full | A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study |
title_fullStr | A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study |
title_short | A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study |
title_sort | novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84054-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT izumikouji anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT shimatakashi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT shigeharakazuyoshi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT sawadakiyoshi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT naitorenato anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT katoyuki anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT ofudemitsuo anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT kanohiroshi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT iwamotohiroaki anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT yaegashihiroshi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT nakashimakazufumi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT iijimamasashi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT kawaguchishohei anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT noharatakahiro anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT kadonoyoshifumi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT mizokamiatsushi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT izumikouji novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT shimatakashi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT shigeharakazuyoshi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT sawadakiyoshi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT naitorenato novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT katoyuki novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT ofudemitsuo novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT kanohiroshi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT iwamotohiroaki novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT yaegashihiroshi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT nakashimakazufumi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT iijimamasashi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT kawaguchishohei novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT noharatakahiro novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT kadonoyoshifumi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy AT mizokamiatsushi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy |