Cargando…

A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study

Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izumi, Kouji, Shima, Takashi, Shigehara, Kazuyoshi, Sawada, Kiyoshi, Naito, Renato, Kato, Yuki, Ofude, Mitsuo, Kano, Hiroshi, Iwamoto, Hiroaki, Yaegashi, Hiroshi, Nakashima, Kazufumi, Iijima, Masashi, Kawaguchi, Shohei, Nohara, Takahiro, Kadono, Yoshifumi, Mizokami, Atsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84054-7
_version_ 1783655006168154112
author Izumi, Kouji
Shima, Takashi
Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
Sawada, Kiyoshi
Naito, Renato
Kato, Yuki
Ofude, Mitsuo
Kano, Hiroshi
Iwamoto, Hiroaki
Yaegashi, Hiroshi
Nakashima, Kazufumi
Iijima, Masashi
Kawaguchi, Shohei
Nohara, Takahiro
Kadono, Yoshifumi
Mizokami, Atsushi
author_facet Izumi, Kouji
Shima, Takashi
Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
Sawada, Kiyoshi
Naito, Renato
Kato, Yuki
Ofude, Mitsuo
Kano, Hiroshi
Iwamoto, Hiroaki
Yaegashi, Hiroshi
Nakashima, Kazufumi
Iijima, Masashi
Kawaguchi, Shohei
Nohara, Takahiro
Kadono, Yoshifumi
Mizokami, Atsushi
author_sort Izumi, Kouji
collection PubMed
description Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for overall survival that we previously developed, is effective in a large cohort. Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter diagnostic/prognostic study was conducted. Patients with MUO were divided into three risk groups based on the score calculated using four prognostic factors (PLaCT: Primary site, Laterality, serum Creatinine level, and Treatment for primary site) at the first visit, and prospective follow-up was performed. Overall survival and ureteral stent failure-free survival of each risk group were compared. In total, 300 patients with 21 different primary sites were enrolled. The numbers of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 105, 106, and 89, respectively. Median survival times of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 406, 221, and 77 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 217 patients with ureteral stenting, median ureteral stent failure-free survival times of good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 385, 183, and 57 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Limitations include the limited ethnicity and the extended duration of study enrollment. The novel PLaCT risk classification score could divide MUO patients into three risk groups with distinct survival times and ureteral stent patencies. This score will aid in establishing prognosis and treatment strategy for all physicians engaged in cancer treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7904864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79048642021-02-25 A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study Izumi, Kouji Shima, Takashi Shigehara, Kazuyoshi Sawada, Kiyoshi Naito, Renato Kato, Yuki Ofude, Mitsuo Kano, Hiroshi Iwamoto, Hiroaki Yaegashi, Hiroshi Nakashima, Kazufumi Iijima, Masashi Kawaguchi, Shohei Nohara, Takahiro Kadono, Yoshifumi Mizokami, Atsushi Sci Rep Article Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for overall survival that we previously developed, is effective in a large cohort. Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter diagnostic/prognostic study was conducted. Patients with MUO were divided into three risk groups based on the score calculated using four prognostic factors (PLaCT: Primary site, Laterality, serum Creatinine level, and Treatment for primary site) at the first visit, and prospective follow-up was performed. Overall survival and ureteral stent failure-free survival of each risk group were compared. In total, 300 patients with 21 different primary sites were enrolled. The numbers of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 105, 106, and 89, respectively. Median survival times of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 406, 221, and 77 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 217 patients with ureteral stenting, median ureteral stent failure-free survival times of good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 385, 183, and 57 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Limitations include the limited ethnicity and the extended duration of study enrollment. The novel PLaCT risk classification score could divide MUO patients into three risk groups with distinct survival times and ureteral stent patencies. This score will aid in establishing prognosis and treatment strategy for all physicians engaged in cancer treatment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7904864/ /pubmed/33627826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84054-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Izumi, Kouji
Shima, Takashi
Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
Sawada, Kiyoshi
Naito, Renato
Kato, Yuki
Ofude, Mitsuo
Kano, Hiroshi
Iwamoto, Hiroaki
Yaegashi, Hiroshi
Nakashima, Kazufumi
Iijima, Masashi
Kawaguchi, Shohei
Nohara, Takahiro
Kadono, Yoshifumi
Mizokami, Atsushi
A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_full A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_fullStr A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_full_unstemmed A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_short A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_sort novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84054-7
work_keys_str_mv AT izumikouji anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT shimatakashi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT shigeharakazuyoshi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT sawadakiyoshi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT naitorenato anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT katoyuki anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT ofudemitsuo anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kanohiroshi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT iwamotohiroaki anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT yaegashihiroshi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT nakashimakazufumi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT iijimamasashi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kawaguchishohei anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT noharatakahiro anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kadonoyoshifumi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT mizokamiatsushi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT izumikouji novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT shimatakashi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT shigeharakazuyoshi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT sawadakiyoshi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT naitorenato novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT katoyuki novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT ofudemitsuo novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kanohiroshi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT iwamotohiroaki novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT yaegashihiroshi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT nakashimakazufumi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT iijimamasashi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kawaguchishohei novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT noharatakahiro novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kadonoyoshifumi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT mizokamiatsushi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy