Cargando…

Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower

Paralympic rowers with functional impairments of the legs and trunk rely on appropriate seat configurations for performance. We compared performance, physiology, and biomechanics of an elite Paralympic rower competing in the PR1 class during ergometer rowing in a seat with three different seat and b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Severin, Anna Cecilia, Danielsen, Jørgen, Falck Erichsen, Jørgen, Wold Eikevåg, Sindre, Steinert, Martin, Ettema, Gertjan, Baumgart, Julia Kathrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.625656
_version_ 1783655008967852032
author Severin, Anna Cecilia
Danielsen, Jørgen
Falck Erichsen, Jørgen
Wold Eikevåg, Sindre
Steinert, Martin
Ettema, Gertjan
Baumgart, Julia Kathrin
author_facet Severin, Anna Cecilia
Danielsen, Jørgen
Falck Erichsen, Jørgen
Wold Eikevåg, Sindre
Steinert, Martin
Ettema, Gertjan
Baumgart, Julia Kathrin
author_sort Severin, Anna Cecilia
collection PubMed
description Paralympic rowers with functional impairments of the legs and trunk rely on appropriate seat configurations for performance. We compared performance, physiology, and biomechanics of an elite Paralympic rower competing in the PR1 class during ergometer rowing in a seat with three different seat and backrest inclination configurations. Unlike able-bodied rowers, PR1 rowers are required to use a seat with a backrest. For this study, we examined the following seat/backrest configurations: conA: 7.5°/25°, conB: 0°/25°, and conC: 0°/5° (usually used by the participant). All data was collected on a single day, i.e., in each configuration, one 4-min submaximal (100 W) and one maximal (all-out) stage was performed. The rowing ergometer provided the average power and (virtual) distance of each stage, while motion capture provided kinematic data, a load cell measured the force exerted on the ergometer chain, and an ergospirometer measured oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]). Where appropriate, a Friedman's test with post-hoc comparisons performed with Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests identified differences between the configurations. Despite similar distances covered during the submaximal intensity (conA: 793, conB: 793, conC: 787 m), the peak force was lower in conC (conA: 509, conB: 458, conC: 312 N) while the stroke rate (conA: 27 conB: 31, conC: 49 strokes·min(−1)) and [Formula: see text] (conA: 34.4, conB: 35.4, conC: 39.6 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) were higher. During the maximal stage, the virtual distances were 7–9% longer in conA and conB, with higher peak forces (conA: 934 m, 408 N, conB: 918 m, 418 N, conC: 856 m, 331 N), and lower stroke rates (conA: 51, conB: 54, conC: 56 strokes·min(−1)), though there was no difference in [Formula: see text] (~47 ml(−1)·kg(−1)·min(−1)). At both intensities, trunk range of motion was significantly larger in configurations conA and conB. Although fatigue may have accumulated during the test day, this study showed that a more inclined seat and backrest during ergometer rowing improved the performance of a successful Paralympic PR1 rower. The considerable increase in ergometer rowing performance in one of the top Paralympic rowers in the world is astonishing and highlights the importance of designing equipment that can be adjusted to match the individual needs of Paralympic athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7904876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79048762021-02-26 Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower Severin, Anna Cecilia Danielsen, Jørgen Falck Erichsen, Jørgen Wold Eikevåg, Sindre Steinert, Martin Ettema, Gertjan Baumgart, Julia Kathrin Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living Paralympic rowers with functional impairments of the legs and trunk rely on appropriate seat configurations for performance. We compared performance, physiology, and biomechanics of an elite Paralympic rower competing in the PR1 class during ergometer rowing in a seat with three different seat and backrest inclination configurations. Unlike able-bodied rowers, PR1 rowers are required to use a seat with a backrest. For this study, we examined the following seat/backrest configurations: conA: 7.5°/25°, conB: 0°/25°, and conC: 0°/5° (usually used by the participant). All data was collected on a single day, i.e., in each configuration, one 4-min submaximal (100 W) and one maximal (all-out) stage was performed. The rowing ergometer provided the average power and (virtual) distance of each stage, while motion capture provided kinematic data, a load cell measured the force exerted on the ergometer chain, and an ergospirometer measured oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]). Where appropriate, a Friedman's test with post-hoc comparisons performed with Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests identified differences between the configurations. Despite similar distances covered during the submaximal intensity (conA: 793, conB: 793, conC: 787 m), the peak force was lower in conC (conA: 509, conB: 458, conC: 312 N) while the stroke rate (conA: 27 conB: 31, conC: 49 strokes·min(−1)) and [Formula: see text] (conA: 34.4, conB: 35.4, conC: 39.6 mL·kg(−1)·min(−1)) were higher. During the maximal stage, the virtual distances were 7–9% longer in conA and conB, with higher peak forces (conA: 934 m, 408 N, conB: 918 m, 418 N, conC: 856 m, 331 N), and lower stroke rates (conA: 51, conB: 54, conC: 56 strokes·min(−1)), though there was no difference in [Formula: see text] (~47 ml(−1)·kg(−1)·min(−1)). At both intensities, trunk range of motion was significantly larger in configurations conA and conB. Although fatigue may have accumulated during the test day, this study showed that a more inclined seat and backrest during ergometer rowing improved the performance of a successful Paralympic PR1 rower. The considerable increase in ergometer rowing performance in one of the top Paralympic rowers in the world is astonishing and highlights the importance of designing equipment that can be adjusted to match the individual needs of Paralympic athletes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7904876/ /pubmed/33644753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.625656 Text en Copyright © 2021 Severin, Danielsen, Falck Erichsen, Wold Eikevåg, Steinert, Ettema and Baumgart. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Severin, Anna Cecilia
Danielsen, Jørgen
Falck Erichsen, Jørgen
Wold Eikevåg, Sindre
Steinert, Martin
Ettema, Gertjan
Baumgart, Julia Kathrin
Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower
title Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower
title_full Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower
title_fullStr Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower
title_full_unstemmed Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower
title_short Case Report: Adjusting Seat and Backrest Angle Improves Performance in an Elite Paralympic Rower
title_sort case report: adjusting seat and backrest angle improves performance in an elite paralympic rower
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7904876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.625656
work_keys_str_mv AT severinannacecilia casereportadjustingseatandbackrestangleimprovesperformanceinaneliteparalympicrower
AT danielsenjørgen casereportadjustingseatandbackrestangleimprovesperformanceinaneliteparalympicrower
AT falckerichsenjørgen casereportadjustingseatandbackrestangleimprovesperformanceinaneliteparalympicrower
AT woldeikevagsindre casereportadjustingseatandbackrestangleimprovesperformanceinaneliteparalympicrower
AT steinertmartin casereportadjustingseatandbackrestangleimprovesperformanceinaneliteparalympicrower
AT ettemagertjan casereportadjustingseatandbackrestangleimprovesperformanceinaneliteparalympicrower
AT baumgartjuliakathrin casereportadjustingseatandbackrestangleimprovesperformanceinaneliteparalympicrower