Cargando…
Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation
BACKGROUND: External fixation is the primary treatment option in children for femoral shaft fractures, such as open femoral or multiple fractures. One complication is refracture, which is the biggest limitation of fixation devices. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with refr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33625585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00569-9 |
_version_ | 1783655032333271040 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Meizhen Su, Yuxi |
author_facet | Guo, Meizhen Su, Yuxi |
author_sort | Guo, Meizhen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: External fixation is the primary treatment option in children for femoral shaft fractures, such as open femoral or multiple fractures. One complication is refracture, which is the biggest limitation of fixation devices. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with refracture after the removal of external fixation devices and decrease the frequency of refracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 165 patients treated at our hospital for fresh femoral shaft fractures with external fixation between May 2009 and February 2018 were included in this study. Patients with pathological fractures, fractures of the femoral neck, fractures that were fixed using plates or elastic stable intramedullary nailing, and old fractures, as well as those who underwent postoperative femoral surgery were excluded. Potential risk factors included: patient age, gender, and weight, fracture sides, open or closed fracture, fracture sites, reduction methods, operation time, perioperative bleeding, number and diameter of the screws, and immobilization time. These factors were identified by univariate and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Femoral shaft refracture developed in 24 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that refracture was not statistically significantly associated with any of the above factors, except AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF) classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio (L2, length of femur fixed by the two screws farthest from the fracture line; L3, the total length from the greater trochanter to the distal end of femur; P < 0.001 and P = 0.0141, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were also independent risk factors for femoral refracture. CONCLUSIONS: Femoral shaft refracture is relatively common in children treated with external fixation. Because of the limited number of cases in this study, we cautiously concluded that the PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were independent risk factors for femoral shaft refracture in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7905006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79050062021-03-09 Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation Guo, Meizhen Su, Yuxi J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: External fixation is the primary treatment option in children for femoral shaft fractures, such as open femoral or multiple fractures. One complication is refracture, which is the biggest limitation of fixation devices. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with refracture after the removal of external fixation devices and decrease the frequency of refracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 165 patients treated at our hospital for fresh femoral shaft fractures with external fixation between May 2009 and February 2018 were included in this study. Patients with pathological fractures, fractures of the femoral neck, fractures that were fixed using plates or elastic stable intramedullary nailing, and old fractures, as well as those who underwent postoperative femoral surgery were excluded. Potential risk factors included: patient age, gender, and weight, fracture sides, open or closed fracture, fracture sites, reduction methods, operation time, perioperative bleeding, number and diameter of the screws, and immobilization time. These factors were identified by univariate and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Femoral shaft refracture developed in 24 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that refracture was not statistically significantly associated with any of the above factors, except AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF) classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio (L2, length of femur fixed by the two screws farthest from the fracture line; L3, the total length from the greater trochanter to the distal end of femur; P < 0.001 and P = 0.0141, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were also independent risk factors for femoral refracture. CONCLUSIONS: Femoral shaft refracture is relatively common in children treated with external fixation. Because of the limited number of cases in this study, we cautiously concluded that the PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were independent risk factors for femoral shaft refracture in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Springer International Publishing 2021-02-24 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7905006/ /pubmed/33625585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00569-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Guo, Meizhen Su, Yuxi Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation |
title | Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation |
title_full | Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation |
title_fullStr | Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation |
title_short | Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation |
title_sort | risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33625585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00569-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guomeizhen riskfactorsforrefractureofthefemoralshaftinchildrenafterremovalofexternalfixation AT suyuxi riskfactorsforrefractureofthefemoralshaftinchildrenafterremovalofexternalfixation |