Cargando…
SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection
In a post-pandemic scenario, indoor air monitoring may be required seeking to safeguard public health, and therefore well-defined methods, protocols, and equipment play an important role. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, this manuscript presents a literature review on indoor air sampling methods t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13001-w |
_version_ | 1783655063471783936 |
---|---|
author | Borges, João Tito Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo Maniero, Milena Guedes Guimarães, José Roberto |
author_facet | Borges, João Tito Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo Maniero, Milena Guedes Guimarães, José Roberto |
author_sort | Borges, João Tito |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a post-pandemic scenario, indoor air monitoring may be required seeking to safeguard public health, and therefore well-defined methods, protocols, and equipment play an important role. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, this manuscript presents a literature review on indoor air sampling methods to detect viruses, especially SARS-CoV-2. The review was conducted using the following online databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, and PubMed, and the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” to combine the following keywords: air sampler, coronavirus, COVID-19, indoor, and SARS-CoV-2. This review included 25 published papers reporting sampling and detection methods for SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments. Most of the papers focused on sampling and analysis of viruses in aerosols present in contaminated areas and potential transmission to adjacent areas. Negative results were found in 10 studies, while 15 papers showed positive results in at least one sample. Overall, papers report several sampling devices and methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection, using different approaches for distance, height from the floor, flow rates, and sampled air volumes. Regarding the efficacy of each mechanism as measured by the percentage of investigations with positive samples, the literature review indicates that solid impactors are more effective than liquid impactors, or filters, and the combination of various methods may be recommended. As a final remark, determining the sampling method is not a trivial task, as the samplers and the environment influence the presence and viability of viruses in the samples, and thus a case-by-case assessment is required for the selection of sampling systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7905194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79051942021-02-25 SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection Borges, João Tito Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo Maniero, Milena Guedes Guimarães, José Roberto Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Environmental Factors and the Epidemics of COVID-19 In a post-pandemic scenario, indoor air monitoring may be required seeking to safeguard public health, and therefore well-defined methods, protocols, and equipment play an important role. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, this manuscript presents a literature review on indoor air sampling methods to detect viruses, especially SARS-CoV-2. The review was conducted using the following online databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, and PubMed, and the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” to combine the following keywords: air sampler, coronavirus, COVID-19, indoor, and SARS-CoV-2. This review included 25 published papers reporting sampling and detection methods for SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments. Most of the papers focused on sampling and analysis of viruses in aerosols present in contaminated areas and potential transmission to adjacent areas. Negative results were found in 10 studies, while 15 papers showed positive results in at least one sample. Overall, papers report several sampling devices and methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection, using different approaches for distance, height from the floor, flow rates, and sampled air volumes. Regarding the efficacy of each mechanism as measured by the percentage of investigations with positive samples, the literature review indicates that solid impactors are more effective than liquid impactors, or filters, and the combination of various methods may be recommended. As a final remark, determining the sampling method is not a trivial task, as the samplers and the environment influence the presence and viability of viruses in the samples, and thus a case-by-case assessment is required for the selection of sampling systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7905194/ /pubmed/33630259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13001-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Environmental Factors and the Epidemics of COVID-19 Borges, João Tito Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo Maniero, Milena Guedes Guimarães, José Roberto SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection |
title | SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection |
title_full | SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection |
title_fullStr | SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection |
title_full_unstemmed | SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection |
title_short | SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection |
title_sort | sars-cov-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection |
topic | Environmental Factors and the Epidemics of COVID-19 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13001-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borgesjoaotito sarscov2asystematicreviewofindoorairsamplingforvirusdetection AT nakadalianeyurikondo sarscov2asystematicreviewofindoorairsamplingforvirusdetection AT manieromilenaguedes sarscov2asystematicreviewofindoorairsamplingforvirusdetection AT guimaraesjoseroberto sarscov2asystematicreviewofindoorairsamplingforvirusdetection |