Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection

In a post-pandemic scenario, indoor air monitoring may be required seeking to safeguard public health, and therefore well-defined methods, protocols, and equipment play an important role. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, this manuscript presents a literature review on indoor air sampling methods t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borges, João Tito, Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo, Maniero, Milena Guedes, Guimarães, José Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13001-w
_version_ 1783655063471783936
author Borges, João Tito
Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo
Maniero, Milena Guedes
Guimarães, José Roberto
author_facet Borges, João Tito
Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo
Maniero, Milena Guedes
Guimarães, José Roberto
author_sort Borges, João Tito
collection PubMed
description In a post-pandemic scenario, indoor air monitoring may be required seeking to safeguard public health, and therefore well-defined methods, protocols, and equipment play an important role. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, this manuscript presents a literature review on indoor air sampling methods to detect viruses, especially SARS-CoV-2. The review was conducted using the following online databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, and PubMed, and the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” to combine the following keywords: air sampler, coronavirus, COVID-19, indoor, and SARS-CoV-2. This review included 25 published papers reporting sampling and detection methods for SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments. Most of the papers focused on sampling and analysis of viruses in aerosols present in contaminated areas and potential transmission to adjacent areas. Negative results were found in 10 studies, while 15 papers showed positive results in at least one sample. Overall, papers report several sampling devices and methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection, using different approaches for distance, height from the floor, flow rates, and sampled air volumes. Regarding the efficacy of each mechanism as measured by the percentage of investigations with positive samples, the literature review indicates that solid impactors are more effective than liquid impactors, or filters, and the combination of various methods may be recommended. As a final remark, determining the sampling method is not a trivial task, as the samplers and the environment influence the presence and viability of viruses in the samples, and thus a case-by-case assessment is required for the selection of sampling systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7905194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79051942021-02-25 SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection Borges, João Tito Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo Maniero, Milena Guedes Guimarães, José Roberto Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Environmental Factors and the Epidemics of COVID-19 In a post-pandemic scenario, indoor air monitoring may be required seeking to safeguard public health, and therefore well-defined methods, protocols, and equipment play an important role. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, this manuscript presents a literature review on indoor air sampling methods to detect viruses, especially SARS-CoV-2. The review was conducted using the following online databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, and PubMed, and the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” to combine the following keywords: air sampler, coronavirus, COVID-19, indoor, and SARS-CoV-2. This review included 25 published papers reporting sampling and detection methods for SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments. Most of the papers focused on sampling and analysis of viruses in aerosols present in contaminated areas and potential transmission to adjacent areas. Negative results were found in 10 studies, while 15 papers showed positive results in at least one sample. Overall, papers report several sampling devices and methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection, using different approaches for distance, height from the floor, flow rates, and sampled air volumes. Regarding the efficacy of each mechanism as measured by the percentage of investigations with positive samples, the literature review indicates that solid impactors are more effective than liquid impactors, or filters, and the combination of various methods may be recommended. As a final remark, determining the sampling method is not a trivial task, as the samplers and the environment influence the presence and viability of viruses in the samples, and thus a case-by-case assessment is required for the selection of sampling systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-02-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7905194/ /pubmed/33630259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13001-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Environmental Factors and the Epidemics of COVID-19
Borges, João Tito
Nakada, Liane Yuri Kondo
Maniero, Milena Guedes
Guimarães, José Roberto
SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection
title SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection
title_full SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection
title_short SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection
title_sort sars-cov-2: a systematic review of indoor air sampling for virus detection
topic Environmental Factors and the Epidemics of COVID-19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13001-w
work_keys_str_mv AT borgesjoaotito sarscov2asystematicreviewofindoorairsamplingforvirusdetection
AT nakadalianeyurikondo sarscov2asystematicreviewofindoorairsamplingforvirusdetection
AT manieromilenaguedes sarscov2asystematicreviewofindoorairsamplingforvirusdetection
AT guimaraesjoseroberto sarscov2asystematicreviewofindoorairsamplingforvirusdetection