Cargando…

Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of SMOFlipid vs non SMOFlipid as TPN for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the widely recognised and leading treatments for end-stage liver disease. Nutrition impacts its success. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is usually prescribed for patients recommended prolonged fasting after LT. The supplement of SMOFlipid (soybean o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Mei-Yun, Kuo, Sheng-Chih, Chuang, Su-Fen, Yeh, Cheng-Hsi, Yin, Shih-Min, Li, Wei-Feng, Wang, Hung-Jen, Chen, Chao-Long, Wang, Chih-Chi, Lin, Chih-Che
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.042
_version_ 1783655096415944704
author Wu, Mei-Yun
Kuo, Sheng-Chih
Chuang, Su-Fen
Yeh, Cheng-Hsi
Yin, Shih-Min
Li, Wei-Feng
Wang, Hung-Jen
Chen, Chao-Long
Wang, Chih-Chi
Lin, Chih-Che
author_facet Wu, Mei-Yun
Kuo, Sheng-Chih
Chuang, Su-Fen
Yeh, Cheng-Hsi
Yin, Shih-Min
Li, Wei-Feng
Wang, Hung-Jen
Chen, Chao-Long
Wang, Chih-Chi
Lin, Chih-Che
author_sort Wu, Mei-Yun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the widely recognised and leading treatments for end-stage liver disease. Nutrition impacts its success. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is usually prescribed for patients recommended prolonged fasting after LT. The supplement of SMOFlipid (soybean oil, MCT oil, olive oil, and fish oil) is easily metabolised to produce energy, and it possesses anti-inflammatory effects; however, SMOFlipid emulsion use raises concerns regarding coagulopathy after LT. This study investigated the postoperative correlation between SMOFlipid and coagulation in LT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 54 recipients of living donor LT between January 2012 and June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with pretransplant platelet count <40,000/μL and >40,000/μL were assigned to the non-SMOFlipid (n = 23) group and the SMOFlipid (n = 31) group, respectively. RESULTS: The coagulation and nutrition profile of patients improved significantly after TPN support. No significant difference was observed in the coagulation profile between SMOFlipid and non-SMOFlipid groups. Although the SMOFlipid group exhibited a higher platelet count than the non-SMOFlipid group on day 7 (P < 0.001), no significant differences were observed in the platelet count on 14 and 30 days after TPN support between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: TPN using SMOFlipid after LT is a good strategy for improving nutritional status without increasing the risks of bleeding and coagulation in patients intolerant of early enteral nutrition. Moreover, SMOFlipid use may not cause coagulopathy up to 14 days after LT. Overall, SMOFlipid provides nutritional benefits without increasing the risk of bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7905355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79053552021-03-03 Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of SMOFlipid vs non SMOFlipid as TPN for liver transplantation Wu, Mei-Yun Kuo, Sheng-Chih Chuang, Su-Fen Yeh, Cheng-Hsi Yin, Shih-Min Li, Wei-Feng Wang, Hung-Jen Chen, Chao-Long Wang, Chih-Chi Lin, Chih-Che Ann Med Surg (Lond) Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the widely recognised and leading treatments for end-stage liver disease. Nutrition impacts its success. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is usually prescribed for patients recommended prolonged fasting after LT. The supplement of SMOFlipid (soybean oil, MCT oil, olive oil, and fish oil) is easily metabolised to produce energy, and it possesses anti-inflammatory effects; however, SMOFlipid emulsion use raises concerns regarding coagulopathy after LT. This study investigated the postoperative correlation between SMOFlipid and coagulation in LT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 54 recipients of living donor LT between January 2012 and June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with pretransplant platelet count <40,000/μL and >40,000/μL were assigned to the non-SMOFlipid (n = 23) group and the SMOFlipid (n = 31) group, respectively. RESULTS: The coagulation and nutrition profile of patients improved significantly after TPN support. No significant difference was observed in the coagulation profile between SMOFlipid and non-SMOFlipid groups. Although the SMOFlipid group exhibited a higher platelet count than the non-SMOFlipid group on day 7 (P < 0.001), no significant differences were observed in the platelet count on 14 and 30 days after TPN support between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: TPN using SMOFlipid after LT is a good strategy for improving nutritional status without increasing the risks of bleeding and coagulation in patients intolerant of early enteral nutrition. Moreover, SMOFlipid use may not cause coagulopathy up to 14 days after LT. Overall, SMOFlipid provides nutritional benefits without increasing the risk of bleeding. Elsevier 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7905355/ /pubmed/33664940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.042 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Cohort Study
Wu, Mei-Yun
Kuo, Sheng-Chih
Chuang, Su-Fen
Yeh, Cheng-Hsi
Yin, Shih-Min
Li, Wei-Feng
Wang, Hung-Jen
Chen, Chao-Long
Wang, Chih-Chi
Lin, Chih-Che
Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of SMOFlipid vs non SMOFlipid as TPN for liver transplantation
title Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of SMOFlipid vs non SMOFlipid as TPN for liver transplantation
title_full Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of SMOFlipid vs non SMOFlipid as TPN for liver transplantation
title_fullStr Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of SMOFlipid vs non SMOFlipid as TPN for liver transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of SMOFlipid vs non SMOFlipid as TPN for liver transplantation
title_short Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of SMOFlipid vs non SMOFlipid as TPN for liver transplantation
title_sort comparative study of the safety and efficacy of smoflipid vs non smoflipid as tpn for liver transplantation
topic Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.042
work_keys_str_mv AT wumeiyun comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT kuoshengchih comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT chuangsufen comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT yehchenghsi comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT yinshihmin comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT liweifeng comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT wanghungjen comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT chenchaolong comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT wangchihchi comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation
AT linchihche comparativestudyofthesafetyandefficacyofsmoflipidvsnonsmoflipidastpnforlivertransplantation